A Bibliometric Review of Service Learning Research, 1950–2022

Philip Hallinger, D. K. Narong
{"title":"A Bibliometric Review of Service Learning Research, 1950–2022","authors":"Philip Hallinger, D. K. Narong","doi":"10.1177/10538259241245137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Service learning has been studied and applied in diverse educational settings for the past seven decades. While several research reviews have explored service learning from varied perspectives, none have employed bibliometric methods to investigate its evolution as a “knowledge base.” Purpose: This review documents the evolving landscape and analyzes the intellectual structure of research on service learning. Methodology/Approach: The review analyzed 5,815 Scopus-indexed documents on service learning using descriptive statistics and science mapping. Findings: The review found that service learning constitutes a mature, rapidly expanding interdisciplinary field, with over 75% of the documents published since 2010. Despite its global scope, the literature remains concentrated in Western, economically developed nations. The intellectual structure of the literature encompasses four interconnected schools of thought: Service Learning Designs and Effects, Theory and Research, Implementation, and Engineering Education. Implications: The review highlights the importance of cross-pollination of theoretical perspectives and empirical findings in service learning research and practice. Subsequent research should prioritize the exploration of service learning in developing countries, the evaluation of diverse theoretical perspectives in studies of service learning designs and effects, and the use of mixed research methods in exploration of cultural, social, and political influences on service learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":506453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experiential Education","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experiential Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259241245137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Service learning has been studied and applied in diverse educational settings for the past seven decades. While several research reviews have explored service learning from varied perspectives, none have employed bibliometric methods to investigate its evolution as a “knowledge base.” Purpose: This review documents the evolving landscape and analyzes the intellectual structure of research on service learning. Methodology/Approach: The review analyzed 5,815 Scopus-indexed documents on service learning using descriptive statistics and science mapping. Findings: The review found that service learning constitutes a mature, rapidly expanding interdisciplinary field, with over 75% of the documents published since 2010. Despite its global scope, the literature remains concentrated in Western, economically developed nations. The intellectual structure of the literature encompasses four interconnected schools of thought: Service Learning Designs and Effects, Theory and Research, Implementation, and Engineering Education. Implications: The review highlights the importance of cross-pollination of theoretical perspectives and empirical findings in service learning research and practice. Subsequent research should prioritize the exploration of service learning in developing countries, the evaluation of diverse theoretical perspectives in studies of service learning designs and effects, and the use of mixed research methods in exploration of cultural, social, and political influences on service learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1950-2022 年服务学习研究文献计量学回顾
背景:在过去的七十年里,服务学习一直在不同的教育环境中得到研究和应用。虽然有多篇研究综述从不同角度探讨了服务学习,但没有一篇采用文献计量学方法来研究其作为 "知识库 "的演变。目的:本综述记录了服务学习研究的演变情况,并分析了服务学习研究的知识结构。方法/途径:本综述使用描述性统计和科学图谱分析了 5,815 篇 Scopus 索引的服务学习文献。研究结果:综述发现,服务学习是一个成熟、快速发展的跨学科领域,超过 75% 的文献是 2010 年以后发表的。尽管其范围遍及全球,但文献仍集中在西方经济发达国家。文献的知识结构包括四个相互关联的学派:服务学习的设计与效果、理论与研究、实施和工程教育。影响:综述强调了服务学习研究与实践中理论观点与实证研究成果相互渗透的重要性。后续研究应优先探索发展中国家的服务学习,评估服务学习设计与效果研究中的不同理论视角,以及使用混合研究方法探索文化、社会和政治对服务学习成果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Outdoor Learning Across the Curriculum: Theory and Guidelines for Practice An Earth-Centered Experiential Psycho-Educational Counseling Group for Native American College Students A Bibliometric Review of Service Learning Research, 1950–2022 “My Favourite Self:” A Retrospective Analysis of an Outdoor Orientation Program Investigating How Immersion Semester High Schools Promote Meaningful Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1