LISA Eligibility and LISA Success in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 3 Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1159/000537904
Ruth Klein, Laura Fastnacht, Angela Kribs, Benjamin Kuehne, K. Mehler
{"title":"LISA Eligibility and LISA Success in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Ruth Klein, Laura Fastnacht, Angela Kribs, Benjamin Kuehne, K. Mehler","doi":"10.1159/000537904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nLess invasive surfactant application (LISA) is associated with improved short-term outcomes in preterm infants. Data on LISA eligibility and success for infants <28 weeks of gestation are lacking.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPreterm infants <28 weeks of gestation who were born and actively treated in our tertiary care center in 2018 were included in the retrospective study. We assessed baseline characteristics, delivery room (DR) management, LISA success and complications, and short-term outcome.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn total, 57 infants received LISA in the DR. LISA eligibility was 73% at 22 weeks, 88% at 23 weeks, and >90% at gestational ages >24 weeks. LISA was successful in 63% of infants. LISA failure was associated with increased risk for high-grade IVH (OR 17.88), death (OR 10.94), and a reduced chance for survival without complications (OR 8.75).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur report justifies LISA as a mode for surfactant application in preterm infants. It contributes to the call for studies to define risk factors for LISA failure.","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Less invasive surfactant application (LISA) is associated with improved short-term outcomes in preterm infants. Data on LISA eligibility and success for infants <28 weeks of gestation are lacking. METHODS Preterm infants <28 weeks of gestation who were born and actively treated in our tertiary care center in 2018 were included in the retrospective study. We assessed baseline characteristics, delivery room (DR) management, LISA success and complications, and short-term outcome. RESULTS In total, 57 infants received LISA in the DR. LISA eligibility was 73% at 22 weeks, 88% at 23 weeks, and >90% at gestational ages >24 weeks. LISA was successful in 63% of infants. LISA failure was associated with increased risk for high-grade IVH (OR 17.88), death (OR 10.94), and a reduced chance for survival without complications (OR 8.75). CONCLUSION Our report justifies LISA as a mode for surfactant application in preterm infants. It contributes to the call for studies to define risk factors for LISA failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极早产儿的 LISA 资格和 LISA 成功率:单中心经验
引言 无创表面活化剂应用(LISA)可改善早产儿的短期预后。有关 90% 胎龄大于 24 周的早产儿接受 LISA 的资格和成功率的数据。63%的婴儿 LISA 成功。LISA 失败与高级别 IVH 风险增加(OR 17.88)、死亡(OR 10.94)和无并发症存活机会减少(OR 8.75)有关。我们的报告证明了 LISA 作为早产儿表面活性物质应用模式的合理性,并呼吁开展研究以确定 LISA 失败的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of heritable and environmental contributions to the development of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very preterm infants: Results from a multicenter twins cohort study. Three-year Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Laser Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Methodological Considerations in the Comparison of INSURE and LISA in Very Preterm Infants. Oxygenation Index and Oxygen Saturation Index in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Do Management Guidelines Make a Difference? Congenital Erythropoietic Porphyria in a Neonate: Utility of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing - A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1