Discriminant accuracy of standing balance tests for level of gait dependency in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer's disease.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1159/000538541
Keita Nakagawa, Shusaku Kanai, S. Kitakaze, Hitoshi Okamura
{"title":"Discriminant accuracy of standing balance tests for level of gait dependency in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Keita Nakagawa, Shusaku Kanai, S. Kitakaze, Hitoshi Okamura","doi":"10.1159/000538541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nWhen determining the level of gait independence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), detailed functional assessment is difficult in some patients. Previous literature has suggested simple standing balance tests for patients with AD due to their ease of implementation in clinical practice and relevance to gait. However, their usefulness for discriminating the level of gait independence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the discrimination accuracy of a simple standing balance test in the level of gait independence among hospitalized patients with AD.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis cross-sectional study was a post-hoc analysis of a study conducted on 63 inpatients with AD in a single hospital. Participants were divided into three groups according to their level of gait independence: independent, modified independent (independent walking with walking aids), and dependent groups (supervision). Gait independence was determined using the Functional Independence Measure. Four standing balance tests were used-closed-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and one-leg standings-and the discrimination accuracy of each test was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOne-leg standing was best at discriminating between the independent and modified independent groups (positive predictive value=80.0%, negative predictive value=94.1%). Tandem standing was best at discriminating between the modified independent and dependent groups (positive predictive value=74.1%, negative predictive value=93.3%).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nA simple standing balance test may assist in determining level of gait independence in patients with AD when it is difficult to perform a mobility assessment.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION When determining the level of gait independence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), detailed functional assessment is difficult in some patients. Previous literature has suggested simple standing balance tests for patients with AD due to their ease of implementation in clinical practice and relevance to gait. However, their usefulness for discriminating the level of gait independence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the discrimination accuracy of a simple standing balance test in the level of gait independence among hospitalized patients with AD. METHODS This cross-sectional study was a post-hoc analysis of a study conducted on 63 inpatients with AD in a single hospital. Participants were divided into three groups according to their level of gait independence: independent, modified independent (independent walking with walking aids), and dependent groups (supervision). Gait independence was determined using the Functional Independence Measure. Four standing balance tests were used-closed-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and one-leg standings-and the discrimination accuracy of each test was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS One-leg standing was best at discriminating between the independent and modified independent groups (positive predictive value=80.0%, negative predictive value=94.1%). Tandem standing was best at discriminating between the modified independent and dependent groups (positive predictive value=74.1%, negative predictive value=93.3%). CONCLUSION A simple standing balance test may assist in determining level of gait independence in patients with AD when it is difficult to perform a mobility assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
站立平衡测试对住院阿尔茨海默病患者步态依赖程度的判别准确性。
简介:在确定阿尔茨海默病患者(AD)的步态独立性水平时,很难对某些患者进行详细的功能评估。以往的文献建议对阿尔茨海默病患者进行简单的站立平衡测试,因为这些测试易于在临床实践中实施,而且与步态相关。然而,这些测试对于鉴别步态独立性水平的作用仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨简单站立平衡测试对住院AD患者步态独立性水平的判别准确性。方法本横断面研究是对一家医院63名住院AD患者进行的一项研究的事后分析。根据步态独立程度将参与者分为三组:独立组、改良独立组(借助助行器独立行走)和依赖组(受监护)。步态独立性采用功能独立性测量法确定。使用了四种站立平衡测试--闭腿站立、半串联站立、串联站立和单腿站立,并通过接收器操作特征分析计算了每种测试的判别准确性。结果 单腿站立最能区分独立组和改良独立组(阳性预测值=80.0%,阴性预测值=94.1%)。结论 在难以进行行动能力评估的情况下,简单的站立平衡测试有助于确定AD患者的步态独立性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
期刊最新文献
Toolkit to Examine Lifelike Language (TELL) v.2.0: Optimizing speech biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Current Advances in Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Older Adults: A systematic Review. Risperidone for the Treatment of Dementia-Related Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Differential Item Functioning and Clinical Utility of the Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1