Keita Nakagawa, Shusaku Kanai, S. Kitakaze, Hitoshi Okamura
{"title":"Discriminant accuracy of standing balance tests for level of gait dependency in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Keita Nakagawa, Shusaku Kanai, S. Kitakaze, Hitoshi Okamura","doi":"10.1159/000538541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nWhen determining the level of gait independence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), detailed functional assessment is difficult in some patients. Previous literature has suggested simple standing balance tests for patients with AD due to their ease of implementation in clinical practice and relevance to gait. However, their usefulness for discriminating the level of gait independence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the discrimination accuracy of a simple standing balance test in the level of gait independence among hospitalized patients with AD.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis cross-sectional study was a post-hoc analysis of a study conducted on 63 inpatients with AD in a single hospital. Participants were divided into three groups according to their level of gait independence: independent, modified independent (independent walking with walking aids), and dependent groups (supervision). Gait independence was determined using the Functional Independence Measure. Four standing balance tests were used-closed-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and one-leg standings-and the discrimination accuracy of each test was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOne-leg standing was best at discriminating between the independent and modified independent groups (positive predictive value=80.0%, negative predictive value=94.1%). Tandem standing was best at discriminating between the modified independent and dependent groups (positive predictive value=74.1%, negative predictive value=93.3%).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nA simple standing balance test may assist in determining level of gait independence in patients with AD when it is difficult to perform a mobility assessment.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"738 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
When determining the level of gait independence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), detailed functional assessment is difficult in some patients. Previous literature has suggested simple standing balance tests for patients with AD due to their ease of implementation in clinical practice and relevance to gait. However, their usefulness for discriminating the level of gait independence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the discrimination accuracy of a simple standing balance test in the level of gait independence among hospitalized patients with AD.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was a post-hoc analysis of a study conducted on 63 inpatients with AD in a single hospital. Participants were divided into three groups according to their level of gait independence: independent, modified independent (independent walking with walking aids), and dependent groups (supervision). Gait independence was determined using the Functional Independence Measure. Four standing balance tests were used-closed-leg, semi-tandem, tandem, and one-leg standings-and the discrimination accuracy of each test was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS
One-leg standing was best at discriminating between the independent and modified independent groups (positive predictive value=80.0%, negative predictive value=94.1%). Tandem standing was best at discriminating between the modified independent and dependent groups (positive predictive value=74.1%, negative predictive value=93.3%).
CONCLUSION
A simple standing balance test may assist in determining level of gait independence in patients with AD when it is difficult to perform a mobility assessment.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications.
The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.