The choice of serum-free light chain analysis method could potentially have clinical consequences for myeloma patients

EJHaem Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1002/jha2.886
Ljupco Veskovski, Ingvar Jakobsson, Per-Ola Andersson, Therese Gustafsson, Annelie Sedigh, Dorota Knut-Bojanowska, Markus Hansson, Cecilie Hveding Blimark, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist
{"title":"The choice of serum-free light chain analysis method could potentially have clinical consequences for myeloma patients","authors":"Ljupco Veskovski,&nbsp;Ingvar Jakobsson,&nbsp;Per-Ola Andersson,&nbsp;Therese Gustafsson,&nbsp;Annelie Sedigh,&nbsp;Dorota Knut-Bojanowska,&nbsp;Markus Hansson,&nbsp;Cecilie Hveding Blimark,&nbsp;Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist","doi":"10.1002/jha2.886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease, that at times poses diagnostic and monitoring challenges. Over the last decades laboratory methods have been expanded with serum free light chain (FLC) analysis. Alerted by two index cases with clinical impact due to failure of the FLC analysis to indicate a disease progression, we aimed to identify any clinical consequences due to known differences between FLC analysis methods. We applied two FLC analysis methods (Freelite Binding Site [FBS] and N-Latex Siemens [NLS]) on all patients with MM and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance diagnosed/followed up at Södra Älvsborg Hematology Unit, from April to December 2022. From a total of 123 patients with malignant plasma cell disorder, we identified five cases (4.1%) where solely the FBS method, as opposed to NLS, urine and serum electrophoresis, could support diagnosis or detect progression. The consequences of this discrepancy included not only change of diagnosis or delayed therapy but also change of treatment. Our findings indicate that a stronger awareness of the potential weaknesses of different FLC methods is needed, which calls for a closer collaboration between clinical chemists and hematologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.886","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease, that at times poses diagnostic and monitoring challenges. Over the last decades laboratory methods have been expanded with serum free light chain (FLC) analysis. Alerted by two index cases with clinical impact due to failure of the FLC analysis to indicate a disease progression, we aimed to identify any clinical consequences due to known differences between FLC analysis methods. We applied two FLC analysis methods (Freelite Binding Site [FBS] and N-Latex Siemens [NLS]) on all patients with MM and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance diagnosed/followed up at Södra Älvsborg Hematology Unit, from April to December 2022. From a total of 123 patients with malignant plasma cell disorder, we identified five cases (4.1%) where solely the FBS method, as opposed to NLS, urine and serum electrophoresis, could support diagnosis or detect progression. The consequences of this discrepancy included not only change of diagnosis or delayed therapy but also change of treatment. Our findings indicate that a stronger awareness of the potential weaknesses of different FLC methods is needed, which calls for a closer collaboration between clinical chemists and hematologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无血清轻链分析方法的选择可能会对骨髓瘤患者产生临床影响
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种有时会给诊断和监测带来挑战的疾病。过去几十年来,实验室方法已扩展到血清游离轻链(FLC)分析。由于 FLC 分析未能显示疾病的进展,有两个病例对临床产生了影响,因此我们希望找出 FLC 分析方法之间的已知差异对临床产生的任何影响。我们对 2022 年 4 月至 12 月期间在 Södra Älvsborg 血液科诊断/随访的所有 MM 和意义不确定的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者采用了两种 FLC 分析方法(Freelite Binding Site [FBS] 和 N-Latex Siemens [NLS])。在总共123例恶性浆细胞病患者中,我们发现有5例患者(4.1%)仅通过FBS方法,而非NLS、尿液和血清电泳来支持诊断或检测病情进展。这种差异造成的后果不仅包括改变诊断或延迟治疗,还包括改变治疗方法。我们的研究结果表明,需要加强对不同 FLC 方法潜在弱点的认识,这就需要临床化学家和血液病学家之间更密切的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Optimisation of the Danish national haemoglobinopathy screening programme – A prospective intervention study A phase 1 trial of venetoclax in combination with liposomal vincristine in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell or T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results from the ECOG‐ACRIN EA9152 protocol Unveiling the nephrotoxic profile of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world experience in Africa IDH2 mutation accelerates TPO-induced myelofibrosis with enhanced S100a8/a9 and NFκB signaling in vivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1