Toxic Leadership and Followers’ Work Motivation: An Angolan Study

IF 0.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Universitas Psychologica Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.11144/javeriana.upsy22.tlfm
Ana Maria Rocha, N. D. dos Santos, Leonor Pais
{"title":"Toxic Leadership and Followers’ Work Motivation: An Angolan Study","authors":"Ana Maria Rocha, N. D. dos Santos, Leonor Pais","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.upsy22.tlfm","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Toxic leadership has detrimental effects on subordinates and has been associated with several negative outcomes in organizations. This research aims to study the effects of toxic leadership dimensions (abusive supervision, authoritarianism, narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability) on followers’ work motivation by using Self-Determination Theory to approach work motivation. Angola faces significant social development challenges that are dependent upon the quality of leadership. Two hundred and nineteen people, aged 30 and 65 years, participated in this research from Angolan organizations in different industry sectors. The Toxic Leadership Scale and Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale were used. Correlation and regression analyses were performed. The narcissism dimension of toxic leadership and the identified regulation of work motivation had the highest scores. Leaders’ narcissism was positively correlated with external material and introjected motivation; self-promotion with introjected and intrinsic motivation. All dimensions of toxic leadership were positively correlated with amotivation. Finally, abusive supervision negatively predicts introjected regulation, and narcissism predicts positively material regulation of work motivation. These relationships were interpreted as the effect of toxic leadership dimensions on work motivation dimensions. Leadership development programs should focus on preventing toxic leadership in order to positively impact the followers’ autonomous regulation.","PeriodicalId":47141,"journal":{"name":"Universitas Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy22.tlfm","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxic leadership has detrimental effects on subordinates and has been associated with several negative outcomes in organizations. This research aims to study the effects of toxic leadership dimensions (abusive supervision, authoritarianism, narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability) on followers’ work motivation by using Self-Determination Theory to approach work motivation. Angola faces significant social development challenges that are dependent upon the quality of leadership. Two hundred and nineteen people, aged 30 and 65 years, participated in this research from Angolan organizations in different industry sectors. The Toxic Leadership Scale and Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale were used. Correlation and regression analyses were performed. The narcissism dimension of toxic leadership and the identified regulation of work motivation had the highest scores. Leaders’ narcissism was positively correlated with external material and introjected motivation; self-promotion with introjected and intrinsic motivation. All dimensions of toxic leadership were positively correlated with amotivation. Finally, abusive supervision negatively predicts introjected regulation, and narcissism predicts positively material regulation of work motivation. These relationships were interpreted as the effect of toxic leadership dimensions on work motivation dimensions. Leadership development programs should focus on preventing toxic leadership in order to positively impact the followers’ autonomous regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有毒领导与追随者的工作动力:安哥拉研究
有毒领导会对下属产生有害影响,并与组织中的一些负面结果相关联。本研究旨在通过使用自我决定理论(Self-Determination Theory)来研究有毒领导力(滥用监督、专制、自恋、自我晋升和不可预测性)对追随者工作动机的影响。安哥拉面临着社会发展的重大挑战,而这些挑战取决于领导力的质量。参与本研究的 219 人来自安哥拉不同行业的组织,年龄在 30 岁至 65 岁之间。研究采用了 "有毒领导力量表 "和 "多维工作动机量表"。进行了相关分析和回归分析。有毒领导的自恋维度和工作动机的识别调节得分最高。领导者的自恋与外部物质激励和内驱力呈正相关;自我推销与内驱力和内在激励呈正相关。有毒领导力的所有维度都与非激励正相关。最后,滥用性监督对工作动机的内驱调节呈负向预测,自恋对工作动机的物质调节呈正向预测。这些关系被解释为有毒领导力维度对工作动机维度的影响。领导力发展项目应注重预防有毒领导力,从而对追随者的自主调节产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas Psychologica
Universitas Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Universitas Psychologica es una revista científica trimestral con un amplio espectro temático y teórico. Es una publicación de carácter general y plural en la medida en que incluye trabajos originales, en inglés o español, de los diversos enfoques de la psicología y de sus distintos campos de aplicación. Cada año un número especial es dedicado a un tópico específico de distintas áreas de la psicología (número monográfico). El propósito de Universitas es convertirse en un fuente importante de consulta a nivel mundial y en un referente permanente de visibilidad e intercambio.
期刊最新文献
Vías de atención a pacientes con un primer episodio de psicosis: Un estudio multicéntrico y multiétnico Toxic Leadership and Followers’ Work Motivation: An Angolan Study Apego y vejez, una nueva perspectiva para la comprensión del bienestar y la regulación emocional en los mayores. Sesenta años de una Facultad expresados en veinte años de una revista: Sección Especial Monográfica Universitas Psychologica Veinte años tejiendo un libro infinito: Universitas Psychologica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1