Firm-size wage-gaps and hierarchy: Evidence from Canada

IF 0.7 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Labour-England Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1111/labr.12269
Ibrahim Bousmah
{"title":"Firm-size wage-gaps and hierarchy: Evidence from Canada","authors":"Ibrahim Bousmah","doi":"10.1111/labr.12269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I investigate the role of hierarchy in explaining wage differential between Canadian large and small firms. I use the confidential-use files of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) from 2016 to 2022 and exploit the mini-panels form to control for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity. The results show that the Canadian employer size wage effects for managers are approximately twice those for non-managers which is consistent with the results of prior studies for other countries. Managers who move from a small to a large firm have earnings increase of 20%, twice the estimated size-wage differential of non-managers (11%). The results also demonstrate that low-skill workers moving from a small to a large firm have earnings increase of 5.3% which is significantly lower than high-skill workers (14.1%). Those results support the role of the hierarchy in explaining an important part of the size-wage effect for Canadian workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45843,"journal":{"name":"Labour-England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/labr.12269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I investigate the role of hierarchy in explaining wage differential between Canadian large and small firms. I use the confidential-use files of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) from 2016 to 2022 and exploit the mini-panels form to control for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity. The results show that the Canadian employer size wage effects for managers are approximately twice those for non-managers which is consistent with the results of prior studies for other countries. Managers who move from a small to a large firm have earnings increase of 20%, twice the estimated size-wage differential of non-managers (11%). The results also demonstrate that low-skill workers moving from a small to a large firm have earnings increase of 5.3% which is significantly lower than high-skill workers (14.1%). Those results support the role of the hierarchy in explaining an important part of the size-wage effect for Canadian workers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司规模工资差距与等级制度:加拿大的证据
我研究了等级制度在解释加拿大大型企业和小型企业之间工资差异中的作用。我使用了 2016 年至 2022 年劳动力调查(LFS)的保密使用档案,并利用小型面板形式控制了时间不变的非观测异质性。结果显示,加拿大雇主规模对经理人的工资影响大约是非经理人的两倍,这与之前对其他国家的研究结果一致。从小型企业转入大型企业的管理人员的收入增长了 20%,是非管理人员规模-工资差异估计值(11%)的两倍。研究结果还表明,低技能工人从小型企业转入大型企业后,收入增长 5.3%,明显低于高技能工人(14.1%)。这些结果支持了等级制度在解释加拿大工人的规模-工资效应中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour-England
Labour-England INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: LABOUR provides a forum for analysis and debate on issues concerning labour economics and industrial relations. The Journal publishes high quality contributions which combine economic theory and statistical methodology in order to analyse behaviour, institutions and policies relevant to the labour market.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Discrimination toward the visually impaired and quota policies in the labor market The impact of a multifaceted program on fragile individuals. Evidence from an RCT in Italy Issue Information Fiscal financing with labour markets frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1