I still don't get it: Easy versus difficult grammar in intermediate German

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1111/tger.12272
Scott Windham, Kristin Lange
{"title":"I still don't get it: Easy versus difficult grammar in intermediate German","authors":"Scott Windham,&nbsp;Kristin Lange","doi":"10.1111/tger.12272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the relative ease or difficulty of grammar commonly taught in intermediate (second-year) German at the university level. Previous studies have investigated the ease or difficulty of specific grammar structures, factors that make it difficult to learn L2 grammar, and teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of difficult grammar. The aim of the present study was to provide an overview of a year's worth of grammar instruction to guide decisions about grammar sequencing, instructional approaches, and instructional time. Grammar was grouped into units consisting of a pre-test, an instructional sequence, and a post-test. Test data were gathered from 498 grammar pre- and post-tests over a 3-year period. The authors hypothesized that certain grammar topics (e.g., vowel-changing present-tense verbs; the perfect) would be relatively easy, while others (e.g., noun and pronoun case; pluperfect) would be relatively difficult. These hypotheses were only partially confirmed. Results showed the pluperfect, comparative and superlative, and preterite were relatively easily learned, whereas fixed prepositions, pronouns, relative clauses, dative verbs, and the passive were much more difficult to learn. The results suggest that instructors focus on easy and essential grammar, introduce difficult grammar without formal assessment, and use test data to sequence topics within and across course levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"57 1","pages":"103-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tger.12272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the relative ease or difficulty of grammar commonly taught in intermediate (second-year) German at the university level. Previous studies have investigated the ease or difficulty of specific grammar structures, factors that make it difficult to learn L2 grammar, and teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of difficult grammar. The aim of the present study was to provide an overview of a year's worth of grammar instruction to guide decisions about grammar sequencing, instructional approaches, and instructional time. Grammar was grouped into units consisting of a pre-test, an instructional sequence, and a post-test. Test data were gathered from 498 grammar pre- and post-tests over a 3-year period. The authors hypothesized that certain grammar topics (e.g., vowel-changing present-tense verbs; the perfect) would be relatively easy, while others (e.g., noun and pronoun case; pluperfect) would be relatively difficult. These hypotheses were only partially confirmed. Results showed the pluperfect, comparative and superlative, and preterite were relatively easily learned, whereas fixed prepositions, pronouns, relative clauses, dative verbs, and the passive were much more difficult to learn. The results suggest that instructors focus on easy and essential grammar, introduce difficult grammar without formal assessment, and use test data to sequence topics within and across course levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我还是不明白:中级德语语法的易与难
本研究调查了大学德语中级(二年级)课程中常用语法的相对难易程度。以往的研究调查了特定语法结构的难易程度、导致学习 L2 语法困难的因素以及教师和学习者对困难语法的看法。本研究的目的是概述一年的语法教学情况,以便为语法排序、教学方法和教学时间的决策提供指导。语法教学被分为若干单元,包括前测、教学顺序和后测。测试数据来自 3 年内的 498 次语法前测和后测。作者假设,某些语法题目(如元音变化的现在时动词;完成时)相对容易,而其他题目(如名词和代词的情况;复数)相对较难。这些假设只得到了部分证实。结果表明,完成时、比较级和最高级以及过去时相对容易学习,而固定介词、代词、相对从句、助动词和被动则难学得多。结果表明,教师应将重点放在简单和基本的语法上,在不进行正式评估的情况下介绍较难的语法,并利用测试数据在课程级别内和课程级别间对主题进行排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Praxis articles and Forum on recruitment and retention Back in business! Professional German(s) at Rhodes College Uncertainty is in the Form: A functional, meaning-based approach to teaching ambiguity as author choice in Kafka's “Vor dem Gesetz” A collaboration between a high school and a college German program: Retention and articulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1