Influence of High-Pressure Processing and Microbial Transglutaminase on the Properties of Pea Protein Isolates

Macromol Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.3390/macromol4020011
Rui P. Queirós, Nicole Moreira, C. Pinto, Liliana G. Fidalgo, Jorge M. A. Saraiva, J. A. Lopes-da-Silva
{"title":"Influence of High-Pressure Processing and Microbial Transglutaminase on the Properties of Pea Protein Isolates","authors":"Rui P. Queirós, Nicole Moreira, C. Pinto, Liliana G. Fidalgo, Jorge M. A. Saraiva, J. A. Lopes-da-Silva","doi":"10.3390/macromol4020011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effects of high-pressure processing (HPP; 600 MPa/15 min) and microbial transglutaminase-catalyzed (MTG; 30 U·g of protein−1) crosslinking on the concentration of dissolved proteins (SOL), free sulfhydryl groups (SH), surface hydrophobicity (H0), and viscosity of pea protein isolates (PPI) at different concentrations (1–13%; w/v). The SOL increased by increasing protein concentration (max. 29%). MTG slightly affected SOL. HPP decreased SOL with increasing protein concentration, and the combination MTG + HPP resulted in a lower SOL than HPP alone. The concentration of SH in untreated PPI increased with increasing protein concentration, reaching a maximum of 8.3 μmol·mg prot−1. MTG increased SH at higher protein concentrations. HPP lowered SH, but its concentration increased by increasing protein concentration. HPP + MTG offset the effect of MTG, yielding lower SH. MTG did not affect H0 at 1% concentration but increased it for concentrations from 3–5%, and there was a decrease with 7–9%. HPP increased H0 up to 37% for intermediate protein concentrations but did not affect it at higher concentrations. MTG + HPP decreased H0 at all protein concentrations. The viscosity of the dispersions increased with protein concentration. HPP increased the viscosity of the dispersions for concentrations above 7%, while MTG only caused changes above 9%. Combined MTG + HPP resulted in viscosity increase. The results underscore the opportunity for innovative development of high-protein products with improved properties or textures for industrial application.","PeriodicalId":510296,"journal":{"name":"Macromol","volume":"77 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4020011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of high-pressure processing (HPP; 600 MPa/15 min) and microbial transglutaminase-catalyzed (MTG; 30 U·g of protein−1) crosslinking on the concentration of dissolved proteins (SOL), free sulfhydryl groups (SH), surface hydrophobicity (H0), and viscosity of pea protein isolates (PPI) at different concentrations (1–13%; w/v). The SOL increased by increasing protein concentration (max. 29%). MTG slightly affected SOL. HPP decreased SOL with increasing protein concentration, and the combination MTG + HPP resulted in a lower SOL than HPP alone. The concentration of SH in untreated PPI increased with increasing protein concentration, reaching a maximum of 8.3 μmol·mg prot−1. MTG increased SH at higher protein concentrations. HPP lowered SH, but its concentration increased by increasing protein concentration. HPP + MTG offset the effect of MTG, yielding lower SH. MTG did not affect H0 at 1% concentration but increased it for concentrations from 3–5%, and there was a decrease with 7–9%. HPP increased H0 up to 37% for intermediate protein concentrations but did not affect it at higher concentrations. MTG + HPP decreased H0 at all protein concentrations. The viscosity of the dispersions increased with protein concentration. HPP increased the viscosity of the dispersions for concentrations above 7%, while MTG only caused changes above 9%. Combined MTG + HPP resulted in viscosity increase. The results underscore the opportunity for innovative development of high-protein products with improved properties or textures for industrial application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高压加工和微生物转谷氨酰胺酶对豌豆蛋白分离物特性的影响
本研究探讨了高压加工(HPP;600 MPa/15 min)和微生物转谷氨酰胺酶催化(MTG;30 U-g 蛋白质-1)交联对不同浓度(1-13%;w/v)豌豆蛋白分离物(PPI)的溶解蛋白浓度(SOL)、游离巯基(SH)、表面疏水性(H0)和粘度的影响。蛋白质浓度越高,SOL 越大(最大值为 29%)。MTG 对 SOL 稍有影响。HPP 会随着蛋白质浓度的增加而降低 SOL,MTG + HPP 组合比单独使用 HPP 的 SOL 更低。未经处理的 PPI 中的 SH 浓度随着蛋白质浓度的增加而增加,最高达到 8.3 μmol-mg prot-1。在蛋白质浓度较高时,MTG 会增加 SH。HPP 会降低 SH,但其浓度会随着蛋白质浓度的增加而增加。HPP + MTG 抵消了 MTG 的影响,使 SH 降低。MTG 在浓度为 1%时不影响 H0,但在浓度为 3-5% 时会增加,而在浓度为 7-9% 时会减少。在中等蛋白质浓度下,HPP 可使 H0 增加 37%,但在较高浓度下则不受影响。在所有蛋白质浓度下,MTG + HPP 都会降低 H0。分散液的粘度随蛋白质浓度的增加而增加。当浓度超过 7% 时,HPP 会增加分散液的粘度,而 MTG 只在浓度超过 9% 时才会引起变化。MTG + HPP 的组合会导致粘度增加。这些结果表明,有机会创新开发出性能或质地更好的高蛋白产品,供工业应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Annealed Bambara Starch as a Stabilizer in Ice Cream Production New Trends in Composite Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment Pulmonary Drug Delivery through Responsive Materials Peach Gum Polysaccharide as an Additive for Thermoplastic Starch to Produce Water-Soluble Films Fabrication and Characterization of Collagen–Magnetic Particle Composite Microbeads for Targeted Cell Adhesion and Proliferation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1