Is Time-Restricted Eating (Eating 12–8pm) More Effective for Weight Loss and Glycaemic Control than Calorie Restriction?

Alyson Hill
{"title":"Is Time-Restricted Eating (Eating 12–8pm) More Effective for Weight Loss and Glycaemic Control than Calorie Restriction?","authors":"Alyson Hill","doi":"10.1159/000538298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This 6-month randomized clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness and safety of time-restricted eating (TRE) compared to daily calorie restriction (CR) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. The study involved 75 participants and measured changes in body weight, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and metabolic risk factors. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 different groups: (1) TRE (eating from 12 to 8pm, without calorie counting), (2) CR (25% energy restriction daily), (3) control. Results showed that the TRE group experienced statistically significant weight loss and reductions in HbA1c levels compared to the control group. However, the CR group did not show significant weight loss. No serious adverse events were reported. The study suggests that TRE could be an effective strategy for weight loss and glycaemic control in individuals with T2D, but further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":355068,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":"220 S714","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This 6-month randomized clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness and safety of time-restricted eating (TRE) compared to daily calorie restriction (CR) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. The study involved 75 participants and measured changes in body weight, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and metabolic risk factors. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 different groups: (1) TRE (eating from 12 to 8pm, without calorie counting), (2) CR (25% energy restriction daily), (3) control. Results showed that the TRE group experienced statistically significant weight loss and reductions in HbA1c levels compared to the control group. However, the CR group did not show significant weight loss. No serious adverse events were reported. The study suggests that TRE could be an effective strategy for weight loss and glycaemic control in individuals with T2D, but further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限时进食(中午 12 点至晚上 8 点进食)比限制热量摄入对减肥和血糖控制更有效吗?
这项为期 6 个月的随机临床试验评估了限时进食(TRE)与每日热量限制(CR)相比,对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)和肥胖症患者的有效性和安全性。这项研究有 75 名参与者参加,测量了体重、血红蛋白 A1c (HbA1c) 水平和代谢风险因素的变化。参与者被随机分为 3 个不同的组别:(1)TRE 组(从中午 12 点到晚上 8 点进食,不计算卡路里);(2)CR 组(每天限制 25% 的能量);(3)对照组。结果表明,与对照组相比,TRE 组的体重减轻和 HbA1c 水平降低具有显著的统计学意义。然而,CR 组的体重没有明显减轻。没有严重不良事件的报告。这项研究表明,TRE 可以作为一种有效的策略,帮助患有 T2D 的患者减轻体重和控制血糖,但还需要进行样本量更大、随访时间更长的进一步研究,以证实这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Nutrition Strategies: A Focus on Vulnerable Populations Showcasing Sustainability Within Dietetics Education – Opportunities and Challenges Nourishing Neurons: Exploring the Role of Plant-Based Diets in Parkinson’s Disease Prevention Is Time-Restricted Eating (Eating 12–8pm) More Effective for Weight Loss and Glycaemic Control than Calorie Restriction? How Can Distance Learning Help with the Future of Dietetics Education?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1