The effect of forced even pacing and an opponent on end-spurt behaviour in freestyle pool swimming

Joshua E. Neuloh, Andreas Venhorst, Sabrina Skorski, Tim Meyer
{"title":"The effect of forced even pacing and an opponent on end-spurt behaviour in freestyle pool swimming","authors":"Joshua E. Neuloh,&nbsp;Andreas Venhorst,&nbsp;Sabrina Skorski,&nbsp;Tim Meyer","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To investigate the effect of forced even pacing through virtual pacing assistance and an opponent in a competitive setting on end-spurt behaviour in freestyle swimmers, including related physiological underpinnings. Twenty-seven competitive swimmers and triathletes were recruited. There were four 1500 m freestyle trials: (i) familiarisation time trial, (ii) self-paced time trial (STT), (iii) head-to-head competition time trial (CTT) and (iv) forced even pacing through virtual pacing assistance time trial (FET). Eventually, 12 swimmers met the criteria for the CTT and FET to be included in the analysis. Changes in end-spurt behaviour, finishing time and physiological parameters (lactate, cortisol, noradrenaline and heart rate) were analysed using a linear mixed model with fixed effects for trials and a random effect for swimmer identity. A separate linear model was computed for competition outcome. The end-spurt for each race was determined by means of an end-spurt indicator (ESI; ESI &gt; 0 greater end-spurt). Swimmers demonstrated a significantly greater ESI in FET (+2.6; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and CTT (+1.4; <i>p</i> = 0.022) compared to STT. Blood lactate concentration in FET (+1.0 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and CTT (+1.6 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) was significantly higher than in STT. Winners had a significantly greater ESI than losers in CTT (+1.6 and <i>p</i> = 0.005). Swimmers utilised a greater end-spurt through metabolically optimal forced even pacing by virtual pacing assistance and in a head-to-head competition due a larger mobilisation of anaerobic reserves as indicated by greater blood lactate concentrations. Winners had a significantly greater end-spurt than losers despite similar metabolic disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the effect of forced even pacing through virtual pacing assistance and an opponent in a competitive setting on end-spurt behaviour in freestyle swimmers, including related physiological underpinnings. Twenty-seven competitive swimmers and triathletes were recruited. There were four 1500 m freestyle trials: (i) familiarisation time trial, (ii) self-paced time trial (STT), (iii) head-to-head competition time trial (CTT) and (iv) forced even pacing through virtual pacing assistance time trial (FET). Eventually, 12 swimmers met the criteria for the CTT and FET to be included in the analysis. Changes in end-spurt behaviour, finishing time and physiological parameters (lactate, cortisol, noradrenaline and heart rate) were analysed using a linear mixed model with fixed effects for trials and a random effect for swimmer identity. A separate linear model was computed for competition outcome. The end-spurt for each race was determined by means of an end-spurt indicator (ESI; ESI > 0 greater end-spurt). Swimmers demonstrated a significantly greater ESI in FET (+2.6; p < 0.001) and CTT (+1.4; p = 0.022) compared to STT. Blood lactate concentration in FET (+1.0 mmol L−1; p < 0.001) and CTT (+1.6 mmol L−1; p < 0.001) was significantly higher than in STT. Winners had a significantly greater ESI than losers in CTT (+1.6 and p = 0.005). Swimmers utilised a greater end-spurt through metabolically optimal forced even pacing by virtual pacing assistance and in a head-to-head competition due a larger mobilisation of anaerobic reserves as indicated by greater blood lactate concentrations. Winners had a significantly greater end-spurt than losers despite similar metabolic disturbances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制匀速前进和对手对自由泳终点冲刺行为的影响
目的:研究在竞技环境中通过虚拟计步辅助和对手强迫匀速计步对自由泳运动员末段冲刺行为的影响,包括相关的生理基础。招募了 27 名竞技游泳运动员和铁人三项运动员。共进行了四次 1500 米自由泳测试:(i) 熟悉计时测试;(ii) 自定步调计时测试(STT);(iii) 正面竞争计时测试(CTT);(iv) 通过虚拟步调辅助强迫匀速计时测试(FET)。最终,12 名游泳运动员符合 CTT 和 FET 的标准,被纳入分析。采用线性混合模型分析了终点冲刺行为、完成时间和生理参数(乳酸、皮质醇、去甲肾上腺素和心率)的变化。针对比赛结果还计算了一个单独的线性模型。每场比赛的终点冲刺是通过终点冲刺指标(ESI;ESI > 0,终点冲刺越大)确定的。与 STT 相比,游泳运动员在 FET(+2.6;p < 0.001)和 CTT(+1.4;p = 0.022)中的 ESI 明显更高。在 FET(+1.0 mmol L-1;p < 0.001)和 CTT(+1.6 mmol L-1;p < 0.001)中,血液乳酸浓度明显高于 STT。在 CTT 中,获胜者的 ESI 明显高于失败者(+1.6 和 p = 0.005)。游泳运动员通过虚拟匀速辅助进行最佳代谢强迫匀速配速,从而利用了更多的终点冲刺;在正面交锋的比赛中,由于更高的血液乳酸浓度显示出更大的无氧储备动员,游泳运动员利用了更多的终点冲刺。尽管代谢紊乱程度相似,但获胜者的终点冲刺明显高于失败者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's rugby as a catalyst for advancing female-specific science and safety in sport. Case study of a world hour record simulation in an elite cyclist: Insight into task failure. Psychological and social factors associated with mental health of European dual career athletes: A systematic review. The effectiveness of cryostimulation exposure on sleep and recovery in male athletes: Timing considerations. The effects of plyometric versus resistance training on running economy and 5-km running time in middle-aged recreational runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1