High prevalence of response to PPI treatment in children and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis in southern Brazil

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2024.1346843
Luiza Nader, Matias Epifanio, Mariana Guimarães Coelho, C. Steinhaus, M. Melere, Carolina Soares da Silva, Cristina Targa Ferreira
{"title":"High prevalence of response to PPI treatment in children and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis in southern Brazil","authors":"Luiza Nader, Matias Epifanio, Mariana Guimarães Coelho, C. Steinhaus, M. Melere, Carolina Soares da Silva, Cristina Targa Ferreira","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2024.1346843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Eosinophilic esophagitis is a newly recognized entity, in which there is significant evidence available that clearly demonstrates the positive impact of PPIs on reducing esophageal eosinophilia in individuals across different age groups, including children, adolescents, and adults. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain how this treatment effect occurs. In Brazil, there seems to be a lack of studies that have prospectively assessed the clinical and therapeutic response rate in pediatric patients with EoE. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and therapeutic response of pediatric patients with EoE in a medical center located in southern Brazil, by investigating the effectiveness of PPI treatment. Methods This study is a clinical, prospective, open trial that took place in a pediatric hospital located in southern Brazil. The focus of the study was on patients diagnosed with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) who were given treatment using omeprazole/esomeprazole at a dosage of 1 mg.kg per dose, twice daily, for a period of 8–12 weeks. Following the treatment period, the patients underwent another endoscopy. Patients who exhibited 15 or less eosinophils in the biopsy conducted after the treatment were considered as responders. Results A total of 27 patients was evaluated (74.1% boys). The average age (± standard deviation) was 8 years (±4). Nineteen patients (70.3%) were considered as responders to PPI treatment: 6 patients—22.2%—exhibited a complete response (defined as having 5 or fewer eosinophil per high power field. Additionally, 13 patients—48.1%—demonstrated a partial response, characterized by eosinophil counts exceeding 5 but less than 15 eos/hpf. When comparing the responder and non-responder groups at presentation, a statistical difference was observed in the prevalence of food refusal as a presenting symptom. Food refusal was found to be more prevalent in the non-responder group (87.5% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.008). No differences were observed in terms of atopy history and endoscopic scores. Upon comparing the histological findings from the post-treatment endoscopy of the two groups, it was observed that PPI responders exhibited a greater tendency to decrease basal cell hyperplasia (P = 0.06) and intercellular edema (P = 0.08). Conclusion In this group of pediatric patients with EoE in Southern Brazil most patients showed a high prevalence of histological, endoscopic, and clinical response to PPI treatment. PPIs showed efficacy in Brazilian patients with EoE, most of whom would probably not be able to adequately undergo other treatments. Clinical Trial Registration https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2ntbth9, identifier (U1111-1301-1842).","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1346843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Eosinophilic esophagitis is a newly recognized entity, in which there is significant evidence available that clearly demonstrates the positive impact of PPIs on reducing esophageal eosinophilia in individuals across different age groups, including children, adolescents, and adults. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain how this treatment effect occurs. In Brazil, there seems to be a lack of studies that have prospectively assessed the clinical and therapeutic response rate in pediatric patients with EoE. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and therapeutic response of pediatric patients with EoE in a medical center located in southern Brazil, by investigating the effectiveness of PPI treatment. Methods This study is a clinical, prospective, open trial that took place in a pediatric hospital located in southern Brazil. The focus of the study was on patients diagnosed with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) who were given treatment using omeprazole/esomeprazole at a dosage of 1 mg.kg per dose, twice daily, for a period of 8–12 weeks. Following the treatment period, the patients underwent another endoscopy. Patients who exhibited 15 or less eosinophils in the biopsy conducted after the treatment were considered as responders. Results A total of 27 patients was evaluated (74.1% boys). The average age (± standard deviation) was 8 years (±4). Nineteen patients (70.3%) were considered as responders to PPI treatment: 6 patients—22.2%—exhibited a complete response (defined as having 5 or fewer eosinophil per high power field. Additionally, 13 patients—48.1%—demonstrated a partial response, characterized by eosinophil counts exceeding 5 but less than 15 eos/hpf. When comparing the responder and non-responder groups at presentation, a statistical difference was observed in the prevalence of food refusal as a presenting symptom. Food refusal was found to be more prevalent in the non-responder group (87.5% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.008). No differences were observed in terms of atopy history and endoscopic scores. Upon comparing the histological findings from the post-treatment endoscopy of the two groups, it was observed that PPI responders exhibited a greater tendency to decrease basal cell hyperplasia (P = 0.06) and intercellular edema (P = 0.08). Conclusion In this group of pediatric patients with EoE in Southern Brazil most patients showed a high prevalence of histological, endoscopic, and clinical response to PPI treatment. PPIs showed efficacy in Brazilian patients with EoE, most of whom would probably not be able to adequately undergo other treatments. Clinical Trial Registration https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2ntbth9, identifier (U1111-1301-1842).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西南部患有嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎的儿童和青少年对 PPI 治疗反应的高流行率
引言 嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎是一种新发现的疾病,有大量证据清楚地表明 PPIs 对减少不同年龄组(包括儿童、青少年和成人)食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多有积极影响。人们提出了多种机制来解释这种治疗效果是如何产生的。在巴西,似乎缺乏对儿童食道嗜酸性粒细胞增多症患者的临床和治疗反应率进行前瞻性评估的研究。本研究的目的是通过调查 PPI 治疗的有效性,前瞻性地评估巴西南部一家医疗中心的儿科咽喉炎患者的临床和治疗反应。方法 本研究是在巴西南部一家儿科医院进行的一项临床、前瞻性、开放性试验。研究的重点是确诊为嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎(EoE)的患者,这些患者接受了奥美拉唑/奥美拉唑治疗,每次剂量为 1 毫克/千克,每天两次,为期 8-12 周。治疗期结束后,患者再次接受内窥镜检查。在治疗后进行的活组织检查中显示嗜酸性粒细胞在 15 个或以下的患者被视为应答者。结果 共评估了 27 名患者(74.1% 为男性)。平均年龄(± 标准差)为 8 岁(±4)。19名患者(70.3%)被认为对PPI治疗有反应:6名患者-22.2%表现出完全应答(定义为每个高倍视野中嗜酸性粒细胞为5个或更少)。此外,13 名患者-48.1%-表现出部分应答,其特征是嗜酸性粒细胞计数超过 5 但低于 15 eos/hpf。在比较有反应组和无反应组的发病症状时,发现拒食作为首发症状的发生率存在统计学差异。拒食在无应答组更为普遍(87.5% 对 26.3%,P = 0.008)。在过敏史和内窥镜评分方面没有发现差异。比较两组患者治疗后内镜检查的组织学结果发现,PPI 反应者更倾向于减少基底细胞增生(P = 0.06)和细胞间水肿(P = 0.08)。结论 在这组巴西南部的儿童咽喉炎患者中,大多数患者对 PPI 治疗的组织学、内窥镜和临床反应的发生率较高。PPIs 对巴西咽喉炎患者具有疗效,而这些患者中的大多数可能无法充分接受其他治疗。临床试验注册 https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2ntbth9,标识符 (U1111-1301-1842)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Multidisciplinary management of a patient with indolent systemic mastocytosis and refractory symptoms. Diagnosis and management of shrimp allergy. When allergies have no name: is idiopathic anaphylaxis driven by co-factors? Allergenic protein-induced type I hypersensitivity models: a review. Key differences between chronic inducible and spontaneous urticaria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1