Exploring Ethical Dimensions in AI: Navigating Bias and Fairness in the Field

Jeff Shuford
{"title":"Exploring Ethical Dimensions in AI: Navigating Bias and Fairness in the Field","authors":"Jeff Shuford","doi":"10.60087/jaigs.vol03.issue01.p124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid progress in implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various domains such as healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and others has raised significant concerns regarding the fairness and bias embedded within AI systems. This is particularly crucial in sectors like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, credit scoring, and the emerging field of generative AI models (GenAI) producing synthetic media. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities, including biases ingrained in the synthetic data representation of individuals.This survey paper provides a concise yet comprehensive examination of fairness and bias in AI, encompassing their origins, ramifications, and potential mitigation strategies. We scrutinize sources of bias, including data, algorithmic, and human decision biases, shedding light on the emergent issue of generative AI bias where models may replicate and amplify societal stereotypes. Assessing the societal impact of biased AI systems, we spotlight the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes, especially as generative AI gains traction in shaping public perception through generated content.Various proposed mitigation strategies are explored, with an emphasis on the ethical considerations surrounding their implementation. We stress the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the effectiveness of these strategies. Through a systematic literature review spanning multiple academic disciplines, we define AI bias and its various types, delving into the nuances of generative AI bias. We discuss the adverse effects of AI bias on individuals and society, providing an overview of current approaches to mitigate bias, including data preprocessing, model selection, and post-processing. Unique challenges posed by generative AI models are highlighted, underscoring the importance of tailored strategies to address them effectively.Addressing bias in AI necessitates a holistic approach, involving diverse and representative datasets, enhanced transparency, and accountability in AI systems, and exploration of alternative AI paradigms prioritizing fairness and ethical considerations. This survey contributes to the ongoing discourse on developing fair and unbiased AI systems by outlining the sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to AI bias, with a particular focus on the burgeoning field of generative AI.","PeriodicalId":517201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023","volume":"23 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.vol03.issue01.p124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid progress in implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various domains such as healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and others has raised significant concerns regarding the fairness and bias embedded within AI systems. This is particularly crucial in sectors like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, credit scoring, and the emerging field of generative AI models (GenAI) producing synthetic media. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities, including biases ingrained in the synthetic data representation of individuals.This survey paper provides a concise yet comprehensive examination of fairness and bias in AI, encompassing their origins, ramifications, and potential mitigation strategies. We scrutinize sources of bias, including data, algorithmic, and human decision biases, shedding light on the emergent issue of generative AI bias where models may replicate and amplify societal stereotypes. Assessing the societal impact of biased AI systems, we spotlight the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes, especially as generative AI gains traction in shaping public perception through generated content.Various proposed mitigation strategies are explored, with an emphasis on the ethical considerations surrounding their implementation. We stress the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the effectiveness of these strategies. Through a systematic literature review spanning multiple academic disciplines, we define AI bias and its various types, delving into the nuances of generative AI bias. We discuss the adverse effects of AI bias on individuals and society, providing an overview of current approaches to mitigate bias, including data preprocessing, model selection, and post-processing. Unique challenges posed by generative AI models are highlighted, underscoring the importance of tailored strategies to address them effectively.Addressing bias in AI necessitates a holistic approach, involving diverse and representative datasets, enhanced transparency, and accountability in AI systems, and exploration of alternative AI paradigms prioritizing fairness and ethical considerations. This survey contributes to the ongoing discourse on developing fair and unbiased AI systems by outlining the sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to AI bias, with a particular focus on the burgeoning field of generative AI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索人工智能的伦理维度:在偏见与公平领域导航
人工智能(AI)在医疗决策、医疗诊断等各个领域的应用取得了突飞猛进的发展,这引发了人们对人工智能系统中蕴含的公平性和偏见的极大关注。这一点在医疗保健、就业、刑事司法、信用评分等领域以及新兴的生成式人工智能模型(GenAI)制作合成媒体领域尤为重要。这些系统可能会导致不公平的结果,并使现有的不平等现象永久化,包括在个人的合成数据表示中根深蒂固的偏见。本调查报告对人工智能中的公平性和偏见进行了简明而全面的研究,包括其起源、影响和潜在的缓解策略。我们仔细研究了偏差的来源,包括数据、算法和人类决策偏差,揭示了新出现的人工智能生成偏差问题,即模型可能复制和放大社会成见。在评估有偏见的人工智能系统对社会的影响时,我们强调了不平等现象的长期存在和有害成见的强化,尤其是当生成式人工智能在通过生成内容塑造公众认知方面获得牵引力时。我们强调了跨学科合作的必要性,以确保这些策略的有效性。通过横跨多个学科的系统性文献回顾,我们定义了人工智能偏见及其各种类型,并深入探讨了生成性人工智能偏见的细微差别。我们讨论了人工智能偏差对个人和社会的不利影响,概述了当前减轻偏差的方法,包括数据预处理、模型选择和后处理。要解决人工智能中的偏见问题,必须采取综合方法,包括建立多样化和具有代表性的数据集、提高人工智能系统的透明度和问责制,以及探索优先考虑公平性和伦理因素的替代人工智能范式。本调查报告概述了与人工智能偏见有关的来源、影响和缓解策略,并特别关注新兴的生成式人工智能领域,从而为正在进行的有关开发公平、无偏见的人工智能系统的讨论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LLM-Cloud Complete: Leveraging Cloud Computing for Efficient Large Language Model-based Code Completion Utilizing the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Vehicle Telematics for Sustainable Growth in Small and Medium Firms (SMEs) Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship Impact of AI on Education: Innovative Tools and Trends Critique of Modern Feminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1