Reduction of amphibian roadkill by one-side barriers

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Basic and Applied Herpetology Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.11160/bah.283
João Rato, Paulo Sá-Sousa
{"title":"Reduction of amphibian roadkill by one-side barriers","authors":"João Rato, Paulo Sá-Sousa","doi":"10.11160/bah.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amphibians are the most affected vertebrates by roadkill. Often, to minimise this problem mitigation barriers are installed. While two-side barriers effectiveness is well described in the literature, one-side barriers are poorly studied. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of one-side barriers installed by LIFE LINES project along the EM535 road in south-east Portugal. Two types of one-side barriers (one permanent and another temporary one made from tarp) were monitored through road surveys. For each barrier, the influence of interaction between the period (before and after the barrier installation) and road sector (control-no barrier, permanent or temporary barrier installed) on the number of amphibians was evaluated. The result showed that, contrary to the temporary barrier, the permanent one-side barrier appeared to be effective. Thus, the ineffectiveness of the temporary barrier may be related to (i) the tarp material that allows some amphibians to escape, (ii) the presence of vegetation that goes over the top of the barrier, or (iii) increased fence-end effects due to its short length. Even though less effective than two-side barriers, one-side barriers could be installed when there is budget limitation in conservation projects or if land use conflicts exist. Given that our study was the first to evaluate the effectiveness of one-side barriers, we discuss the potential constrains that may have affected our results.","PeriodicalId":53521,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Herpetology","volume":"66 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11160/bah.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amphibians are the most affected vertebrates by roadkill. Often, to minimise this problem mitigation barriers are installed. While two-side barriers effectiveness is well described in the literature, one-side barriers are poorly studied. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of one-side barriers installed by LIFE LINES project along the EM535 road in south-east Portugal. Two types of one-side barriers (one permanent and another temporary one made from tarp) were monitored through road surveys. For each barrier, the influence of interaction between the period (before and after the barrier installation) and road sector (control-no barrier, permanent or temporary barrier installed) on the number of amphibians was evaluated. The result showed that, contrary to the temporary barrier, the permanent one-side barrier appeared to be effective. Thus, the ineffectiveness of the temporary barrier may be related to (i) the tarp material that allows some amphibians to escape, (ii) the presence of vegetation that goes over the top of the barrier, or (iii) increased fence-end effects due to its short length. Even though less effective than two-side barriers, one-side barriers could be installed when there is budget limitation in conservation projects or if land use conflicts exist. Given that our study was the first to evaluate the effectiveness of one-side barriers, we discuss the potential constrains that may have affected our results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过单侧路障减少两栖动物在路上死亡的数量
两栖动物是受公路死亡影响最大的脊椎动物。为了尽量减少这一问题,通常会安装缓解屏障。文献中对双侧路障的效果进行了详细描述,但对单侧路障的研究却很少。本研究旨在评估 LIFE LINES 项目在葡萄牙东南部 EM535 公路沿线安装的单侧路障的效果。通过道路调查对两种类型的单侧路障(一种是永久性路障,另一种是用油布制作的临时性路障)进行了监测。针对每种隔离带,评估了时间段(隔离带安装前后)和路段(对照-无隔离带、安装永久或临时隔离带)之间的相互作用对两栖动物数量的影响。结果表明,与临时隔离栅相反,永久性单侧隔离栅似乎是有效的。因此,临时隔离栅效果不佳可能与以下因素有关:(i) 油布材料使一些两栖动物得以逃脱;(ii) 隔离栅顶部有植被覆盖;或 (iii) 隔离栅长度较短,增加了栅栏末端效应。尽管单面屏障的效果不如双面屏障,但在保护项目预算有限或存在土地使用冲突的情况下,也可以安装单面屏障。鉴于我们的研究是首次评估单侧屏障的有效性,我们将讨论可能影响我们研究结果的潜在限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Basic and Applied Herpetology
Basic and Applied Herpetology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Basic and Applied Herpetology (B&AH) is the open access scientific journal of the Spanish (AHE) and Portuguese (APH) Herpetological Societies. B&AH publishes original Research Papers and updated Reviews about especially interesting issues dealing with any aspect of amphibians and reptiles worldwide. Authors can also submit Short Notes if these are organized around hypotheses appropriately argued and analysed quantitatively.
期刊最新文献
Barred, blotched or intermediate? A photographic-based survey on the spatial distribution of Vipera aspis phenotypes from central-southern Italy The Mesoamerican giant toad (Rhinella horribilis) as bioindicator of vegetation degradation in a tropical forest Reduction of amphibian roadkill by one-side barriers Comparative acute toxicity of pesticides to tadpoles of a tropical anuran (Epipedobates anthonyi), a North American native anuran (Lithobates sphenocephalus) and a standard fish species Is the Pyrenean newt (Calotriton asper) a thermoconformer? Cloacal and water temperature in two different thermal periods in a Pre-Pyrenean stream population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1