Comparison of Dual-Dispatch Protocols on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Observational Study.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.177
Seung Hyo Lee, Young Su Kim, Jeseong Park, H. Lim, Won Pyo Hong
{"title":"Comparison of Dual-Dispatch Protocols on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Observational Study.","authors":"Seung Hyo Lee, Young Su Kim, Jeseong Park, H. Lim, Won Pyo Hong","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nIn South Korea, the National Fire Agency (NFA) conducted a pilot project on the advanced life support (ALS) protocol, including epinephrine administration, to improve the survival rate of out-of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the ALS protocol of NFA on prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (PROSC) in patients with OHCA.\n\n\nMethods\nThis study was conducted on patients with adult-presumed cardiac arrest between January and December 2020. The main factor of interest was ambulance type according to the ALS protocol, which was divided into dedicated ALS(DA), smartphone-based ALS(SALS), and non-dedicated ALS(Non-DA), and the main analysis factor was PROSC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.\n\n\nResults\nDuring the study period, a total of 18,031 adult patients with OHCA were treated by the emergency medical service (EMS), including 7,520 (41.71 %) DA, 2,622 (14.54 %) SALS, and 7,889 (43.75 %) Non-DA. The prehospital ROSC ratio was 13.19% for the DA, 11.17% for the SALS, and 7.91% for the Non-DA ambulance (P < 0.01). Compared with that of the DA group, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for PROSC ratio in the SALS and Non-DA groups were 0.97 (0.82-1.15) and 0.57 (0.50-0.65), respectively. It was shown that the PROSC ratio of the DA group was higher than that of the Non-DA group and was not lower than that of the SALS group.\n\n\nConclusion\nALS protocol intervention was associated with difference in PROSC rates. Therefore, continuous efforts on the systemic implementation of the ALS protocol to improve OHCA outcomes are necessary.","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective In South Korea, the National Fire Agency (NFA) conducted a pilot project on the advanced life support (ALS) protocol, including epinephrine administration, to improve the survival rate of out-of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the ALS protocol of NFA on prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (PROSC) in patients with OHCA. Methods This study was conducted on patients with adult-presumed cardiac arrest between January and December 2020. The main factor of interest was ambulance type according to the ALS protocol, which was divided into dedicated ALS(DA), smartphone-based ALS(SALS), and non-dedicated ALS(Non-DA), and the main analysis factor was PROSC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results During the study period, a total of 18,031 adult patients with OHCA were treated by the emergency medical service (EMS), including 7,520 (41.71 %) DA, 2,622 (14.54 %) SALS, and 7,889 (43.75 %) Non-DA. The prehospital ROSC ratio was 13.19% for the DA, 11.17% for the SALS, and 7.91% for the Non-DA ambulance (P < 0.01). Compared with that of the DA group, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for PROSC ratio in the SALS and Non-DA groups were 0.97 (0.82-1.15) and 0.57 (0.50-0.65), respectively. It was shown that the PROSC ratio of the DA group was higher than that of the Non-DA group and was not lower than that of the SALS group. Conclusion ALS protocol intervention was associated with difference in PROSC rates. Therefore, continuous efforts on the systemic implementation of the ALS protocol to improve OHCA outcomes are necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院外心脏骤停患者恢复自主循环的双调度方案比较:一项全国性观察研究。
目的在韩国,国家消防局(NFA)开展了包括肾上腺素给药在内的高级生命支持(ALS)方案试点项目,以提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的存活率。因此,本研究旨在评估国家外国专家局的高级生命支持方案对院外心脏骤停患者院前自发循环恢复(PROSC)的影响。主要研究因素为根据ALS协议划分的救护车类型,分为专用ALS(DA)、基于智能手机的ALS(SALS)和非专用ALS(Non-DA),主要分析因素为PROSC。结果在研究期间,共有18,031名成人OHCA患者接受了急救医疗服务(EMS),其中包括7,520名(41.71%)DA患者、2,622名(14.54%)SALS患者和7,889名(43.75%)非DA患者。DA组的院前ROSC比率为13.19%,SALS组为11.17%,非DA组为7.91%(P < 0.01)。与DA组相比,SALS组和非DA组PROSC比率的几率比(95%置信区间[CI])分别为0.97(0.82-1.15)和0.57(0.50-0.65)。结果显示,DA 组的 PROSC 比率高于非 DA 组,但不低于 SALS 组。因此,有必要继续系统地实施 ALS 方案,以改善 OHCA 的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Acute iodinate contrast medium reaction: look at the CT images! Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study. Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Epidemiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis Among United States Emergency Departments Over an Eight-Year Period. Floating thrombus involving the aortic arch in a woman.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1