Haemodialysis Patients' Experiences on Complementary and Alternative Therapies: A Qualitative Study

Hatice Ceylan, Ş. T. Yangöz
{"title":"Haemodialysis Patients' Experiences on Complementary and Alternative Therapies: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Hatice Ceylan, Ş. T. Yangöz","doi":"10.22312/sdusbed.1451697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The term complementary and alternative therapies refers to a broad range of medical and healthcare procedures that are outside the purview of traditional medicine. Despite gaps in the scientific evidence to support its use and difficulties in regulating and integrating it into traditional healthcare procedures, the use of complementary and alternative therapies is constantly rising. \nAim: This study aims to explore the experiences of complementary and alternative therapies among haemodialysis patients.\nMaterial and Methods: The study was carried out by adopting the qualitative descriptive research method. Semistructured qualitative interviews, with 17 haemodialysis patients, were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Data saturation was reached during interviews, and audio recordings were verbatim transcribed. Both researchers independently identified key topics, which were subsequently discussed and evaluated simultaneously. \nResults: We identified 4 overarching main themes in this setting: (1) Seeking Control over Health (to have control over their health status); (2) Relief from negative symptoms (to get rid of the negative symptoms they experience; (3) Hope (in the hope of feeling healthy again); and (4) Fear (in which they are afraid to tell health professionals and are afraid of not receiving support).\nConclusion: This study showed that haemodialysis patients seek complementary and alternative therapies because of having control over their health, relief from negative symptoms, hope to feel healthy again, and fear of telling health professionals and receiving support. It is recommended that health professionals should provide information about the safety and possible side effects of these therapies and practice patient-centered treatment through active communication during the treatment process.","PeriodicalId":448097,"journal":{"name":"SDÜ SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SDÜ SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1451697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The term complementary and alternative therapies refers to a broad range of medical and healthcare procedures that are outside the purview of traditional medicine. Despite gaps in the scientific evidence to support its use and difficulties in regulating and integrating it into traditional healthcare procedures, the use of complementary and alternative therapies is constantly rising. Aim: This study aims to explore the experiences of complementary and alternative therapies among haemodialysis patients. Material and Methods: The study was carried out by adopting the qualitative descriptive research method. Semistructured qualitative interviews, with 17 haemodialysis patients, were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Data saturation was reached during interviews, and audio recordings were verbatim transcribed. Both researchers independently identified key topics, which were subsequently discussed and evaluated simultaneously. Results: We identified 4 overarching main themes in this setting: (1) Seeking Control over Health (to have control over their health status); (2) Relief from negative symptoms (to get rid of the negative symptoms they experience; (3) Hope (in the hope of feeling healthy again); and (4) Fear (in which they are afraid to tell health professionals and are afraid of not receiving support). Conclusion: This study showed that haemodialysis patients seek complementary and alternative therapies because of having control over their health, relief from negative symptoms, hope to feel healthy again, and fear of telling health professionals and receiving support. It is recommended that health professionals should provide information about the safety and possible side effects of these therapies and practice patient-centered treatment through active communication during the treatment process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液透析患者对补充和替代疗法的体验:定性研究
背景:补充和替代疗法是指传统医学范围之外的一系列医疗和保健程序。尽管在支持其使用的科学证据方面存在差距,而且在将其纳入传统医疗保健程序方面存在监管困难,但补充和替代疗法的使用仍在不断增加。目的:本研究旨在探讨血液透析患者使用补充和替代疗法的经验:本研究采用定性描述研究法。对 17 名血液透析患者进行了半结构化定性访谈,并对访谈内容进行了定性分析。在访谈过程中达到了数据饱和,并对录音进行了逐字转录。两位研究人员独立确定关键主题,随后同时对这些主题进行讨论和评估。结果在这一背景下,我们确定了 4 个总体主题:(1) 寻求对健康的控制(控制自己的健康状况);(2) 摆脱负面症状(摆脱自己经历的负面症状);(3) 希望(希望重新感觉健康);(4) 恐惧(害怕告诉医疗专业人员,害怕得不到支持):本研究表明,血液透析患者寻求补充和替代疗法的原因包括:对自身健康的控制、缓解不良症状、希望恢复健康,以及害怕告诉医护人员和得不到支持。建议医疗专业人员提供有关这些疗法的安全性和可能的副作用的信息,并在治疗过程中通过积极沟通,实行以患者为中心的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Status on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Short Term Clinical and Functional Results Analysis of the State Archives Republican Archives Documents on Tuberculosis and Fight Against Tuberculosis in the Early Republican Period in Turkiye Haemodialysis Patients' Experiences on Complementary and Alternative Therapies: A Qualitative Study Enneagram Kişilik Tiplerinin Besin Seçimi ile İlişkisinin Araştırılması: Kesitsel Çalışma İmmünoterapi Gören Akciğer Kanserli Hastalarda Diyet Danışmanlığının Rolü
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1