Do recolonising wolves trigger non‐consumptive effects in European ecosystems? A review of evidence

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1002/wlb3.01229
N. Gerber, F. Riesch, Katarzyna Bojarska, M. Zetsche, Nina‐K. Rohwer, J. Signer, Johannes Isselstein, Sven Herzog, Henryk Okarma, D. Kuijper, N. Balkenhol
{"title":"Do recolonising wolves trigger non‐consumptive effects in European ecosystems? A review of evidence","authors":"N. Gerber, F. Riesch, Katarzyna Bojarska, M. Zetsche, Nina‐K. Rohwer, J. Signer, Johannes Isselstein, Sven Herzog, Henryk Okarma, D. Kuijper, N. Balkenhol","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predators can affect ecosystems through non‐consumptive effects (NCE) on their prey, which can lead to cascading effects on the vegetation. In mammalian communities, such cascading effects on whole ecosystems have mainly been demonstrated in protected areas, but the extent to which such effects may occur in more human‐dominated landscapes remains disputable. With the recolonisation of wolves Canis lupus in Europe, understanding the potential for such cascading processes becomes crucial for understanding the ecological consequences of wolf recovery and making appropriate management recommendations. Here, we investigate the evidence for non‐consumptive effects of wolves on their wild ungulate prey and cascading effects on the vegetation in European landscapes. We reviewed empirical studies reporting wild ungulate responses to wolves involving spatio‐temporal behaviour at large and fine spatial scales, activity patterns, vigilance, grouping, physiological effects, and effects on the vegetation. We reveal that non‐consumptive effects of wolves in Europe have been studied in few regions and with focus on regions with low human impact, are highly context‐dependent, and might often be overruled by human‐related factors. Hence, we highlight the need for a description of human influence in NCE studies. We discuss challenges in NCE research and the potential for advances in future research on NCE of wolves in a human‐dominated landscape. We emphasise the need for wildlife management to restore ecosystem complexity and processes, to allow non‐consumptive predator effects to occur.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predators can affect ecosystems through non‐consumptive effects (NCE) on their prey, which can lead to cascading effects on the vegetation. In mammalian communities, such cascading effects on whole ecosystems have mainly been demonstrated in protected areas, but the extent to which such effects may occur in more human‐dominated landscapes remains disputable. With the recolonisation of wolves Canis lupus in Europe, understanding the potential for such cascading processes becomes crucial for understanding the ecological consequences of wolf recovery and making appropriate management recommendations. Here, we investigate the evidence for non‐consumptive effects of wolves on their wild ungulate prey and cascading effects on the vegetation in European landscapes. We reviewed empirical studies reporting wild ungulate responses to wolves involving spatio‐temporal behaviour at large and fine spatial scales, activity patterns, vigilance, grouping, physiological effects, and effects on the vegetation. We reveal that non‐consumptive effects of wolves in Europe have been studied in few regions and with focus on regions with low human impact, are highly context‐dependent, and might often be overruled by human‐related factors. Hence, we highlight the need for a description of human influence in NCE studies. We discuss challenges in NCE research and the potential for advances in future research on NCE of wolves in a human‐dominated landscape. We emphasise the need for wildlife management to restore ecosystem complexity and processes, to allow non‐consumptive predator effects to occur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新定居的狼群会对欧洲生态系统产生非消费性影响吗?证据综述
捕食者可以通过对猎物的非消耗性影响(NCE)来影响生态系统,从而对植被产生连带效应。在哺乳动物群落中,这种对整个生态系统的级联效应主要在保护区中得到证实,但在人类占主导地位的景观中,这种效应的发生程度仍有争议。随着狼群在欧洲的重新定居,了解这种级联过程的可能性对于理解狼群恢复的生态后果和提出适当的管理建议至关重要。在此,我们调查了狼对其野生蹄类动物猎物的非消耗性影响以及对欧洲景观植被的连带影响的证据。我们回顾了有关野生蹄类动物对狼的反应的实证研究,这些反应涉及大空间尺度和小空间尺度的时空行为、活动模式、警惕性、集群、生理效应以及对植被的影响。我们发现,在欧洲,狼的非消耗性影响只在少数地区进行过研究,而且主要集中在人类影响较小的地区,这些影响高度依赖于具体情况,而且可能经常被与人类有关的因素所取代。因此,我们强调有必要在 NCE 研究中描述人类的影响。我们讨论了在人类占主导地位的景观中进行狼的野性教育研究面临的挑战以及未来研究取得进展的潜力。我们强调野生动物管理需要恢复生态系统的复杂性和过程,以允许非消耗性捕食者效应的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
期刊最新文献
Red deer grazing pressure on agricultural grass meadows from broad to local scale Wolf diet in the Notecka Forest, western Poland Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park The effects of variability in catch effort on the precision of statistical population reconstruction Reaching and implementing the best available knowledge in wildlife biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1