Inward FDI and local firms' political connections in emerging markets: Evidence from China

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1503
Meitong Dong, Pengcheng Ma, Lin Cui
{"title":"Inward FDI and local firms' political connections in emerging markets: Evidence from China","authors":"Meitong Dong,&nbsp;Pengcheng Ma,&nbsp;Lin Cui","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Research on the spillover effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) into emerging markets has primarily focused on local firms' productivity or innovation outcomes while overlooking their nonmarket strategies. Based on the resource dependence theory, we propose that inward FDI has a U-shaped impact on local firms' political connections. This is because when FDI is at a low to medium level, its spillover benefits substitute for local firms' dependence on government resources. As FDI further increases, its competitive threats outweigh spillover benefits, driving local firms to a greater dependence on the government to neutralize the threats. This relationship is contingent on external and internal factors altering resource similarity between FDI and local government. Our analyses of Chinese listed firms support our predictions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study delves into how firms in emerging markets respond to inward FDI, particularly focusing on the role of political connections as a nonmarket strategy. Our findings offer valuable insights for both local firms and governments, providing a holistic view of the opportunities and challenges associated with inward FDI. We advise local firms to adopt a balanced approach by integrating both market and nonmarket strategies to maximize benefits, as relying solely on political connections may not be the most effective way to address the challenges posed by inward FDI. Additionally, our research emphasizes the importance of evaluating the resources provided by inward FDI against those provided by local governments, as the similarity of these resources alters the role of inward FDI as perceived by local firms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

Research on the spillover effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) into emerging markets has primarily focused on local firms' productivity or innovation outcomes while overlooking their nonmarket strategies. Based on the resource dependence theory, we propose that inward FDI has a U-shaped impact on local firms' political connections. This is because when FDI is at a low to medium level, its spillover benefits substitute for local firms' dependence on government resources. As FDI further increases, its competitive threats outweigh spillover benefits, driving local firms to a greater dependence on the government to neutralize the threats. This relationship is contingent on external and internal factors altering resource similarity between FDI and local government. Our analyses of Chinese listed firms support our predictions.

Managerial Summary

This study delves into how firms in emerging markets respond to inward FDI, particularly focusing on the role of political connections as a nonmarket strategy. Our findings offer valuable insights for both local firms and governments, providing a holistic view of the opportunities and challenges associated with inward FDI. We advise local firms to adopt a balanced approach by integrating both market and nonmarket strategies to maximize benefits, as relying solely on political connections may not be the most effective way to address the challenges posed by inward FDI. Additionally, our research emphasizes the importance of evaluating the resources provided by inward FDI against those provided by local governments, as the similarity of these resources alters the role of inward FDI as perceived by local firms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴市场中的外来直接投资与当地企业的政治关系:来自中国的证据
有关外国直接投资(FDI)对新兴市场溢出效应的研究主要集中在当地企业的生产率或创新成果上,而忽略了他们的非市场战略。基于资源依赖理论,我们提出,外来直接投资对当地企业的政治联系具有 U 型影响。这是因为当外国直接投资处于中低水平时,其溢出效益会替代本地企业对政府资源的依赖。随着外国直接投资的进一步增加,其竞争威胁超过了外溢效益,促使当地企业更加依赖政府来化解威胁。这种关系取决于改变外国直接投资与地方政府之间资源相似性的外部和内部因素。我们对中国上市公司的分析支持了我们的预测。本研究深入探讨了新兴市场中的企业如何应对外来直接投资,尤其关注政治关系作为一种非市场战略的作用。我们的研究结果为当地企业和政府提供了有价值的见解,提供了与外来直接投资相关的机遇和挑战的整体视角。我们建议当地企业采取一种平衡的方法,将市场和非市场战略结合起来,以实现利益最大化,因为仅仅依靠政治关系可能不是应对外来直接投资带来的挑战的最有效方法。此外,我们的研究还强调了评估外来直接投资提供的资源与当地政府提供的资源的重要性,因为这些资源的相似性会改变当地企业对外来直接投资作用的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Foreign institutional investors and equity share decisions in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions Do financial crises moderate the influence of stakeholder rights protection on M&A activity: The influence of institutional logics and power? Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1