Not So Vats: How Early Is Too Early in the Operative Management of Patients with Traumatic Hemothorax?

Chinweotuto V Uma, William B. Risinger, Suhail Nath, Samuel J. Pera, Jason W Smith
{"title":"Not So Vats: How Early Is Too Early in the Operative Management of Patients with Traumatic Hemothorax?","authors":"Chinweotuto V Uma, William B. Risinger, Suhail Nath, Samuel J. Pera, Jason W Smith","doi":"10.1177/00031348241244638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a practical resource in the management of traumatic hemothorax. However, it carries inherent risks and should be mobilized cost-effectively. In this study, we investigated the ideal VATS timing using cost analysis.\n\n\nMETHODS\n617 cases of unilateral traumatic hemothorax from 2012 to 2022 were identified in our trauma database. We extracted encounter cost, length of stay (LOS), and operative cost information. Using Kruskal-Walli's test, we compared the cost and LOS for patients who underwent VATS or continued nonoperative management in the first 7 days of admission. Additionally, we computed the daily proportion of patients initially managed nonoperatively but ultimately underwent VATS. P-values <.05 were considered significant.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe median encounter cost of cases managed operatively before hospital day 4 (HD4) was higher than those managed nonoperatively. This difference was $63k on HD2 (P-value .07) and was statistically significant for HD3 (difference of $65k, P-value .02). The median LOS with operational management on HD2 and 3 was 7 and 6 respectively vs median LOS of 2 and 3 with nonoperative management on those days (P-value <.001, .01 respectively). The proportion of patients who failed nonoperative management did not change from baseline until HD4 (23% (95% CI 19.7, 26.3) vs 33.9% (95% CI 28.3, 39.6), P-value <.001).\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nEarly mobilization of VATS before hospital day 4 increases the overall hospital cost without offering any length of stay benefit. Continuing nonoperative management longer than 4 days is associated with a high failure rate and a costlier operation.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":"75 1","pages":"31348241244638"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241244638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a practical resource in the management of traumatic hemothorax. However, it carries inherent risks and should be mobilized cost-effectively. In this study, we investigated the ideal VATS timing using cost analysis. METHODS 617 cases of unilateral traumatic hemothorax from 2012 to 2022 were identified in our trauma database. We extracted encounter cost, length of stay (LOS), and operative cost information. Using Kruskal-Walli's test, we compared the cost and LOS for patients who underwent VATS or continued nonoperative management in the first 7 days of admission. Additionally, we computed the daily proportion of patients initially managed nonoperatively but ultimately underwent VATS. P-values <.05 were considered significant. RESULTS The median encounter cost of cases managed operatively before hospital day 4 (HD4) was higher than those managed nonoperatively. This difference was $63k on HD2 (P-value .07) and was statistically significant for HD3 (difference of $65k, P-value .02). The median LOS with operational management on HD2 and 3 was 7 and 6 respectively vs median LOS of 2 and 3 with nonoperative management on those days (P-value <.001, .01 respectively). The proportion of patients who failed nonoperative management did not change from baseline until HD4 (23% (95% CI 19.7, 26.3) vs 33.9% (95% CI 28.3, 39.6), P-value <.001). DISCUSSION Early mobilization of VATS before hospital day 4 increases the overall hospital cost without offering any length of stay benefit. Continuing nonoperative management longer than 4 days is associated with a high failure rate and a costlier operation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不那么瓦特:外伤性血气胸患者的手术治疗 "早 "到什么程度?
背景视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)是治疗外伤性血胸的一种实用手段。然而,它也存在固有的风险,应该以具有成本效益的方式进行。在这项研究中,我们使用成本分析法研究了理想的 VATS 时机。方法在我们的创伤数据库中找到了 2012 年至 2022 年期间的 617 例单侧创伤性血气胸病例。我们提取了就诊成本、住院时间(LOS)和手术成本信息。通过 Kruskal-Walli 检验,我们比较了入院 7 天内接受 VATS 或继续接受非手术治疗的患者的费用和住院时间。此外,我们还计算了最初接受非手术治疗但最终接受 VATS 的患者的每日比例。结果住院第 4 天(HD4)前接受手术治疗的病例的中位住院费用高于接受非手术治疗的病例。HD2 的差异为 6.3 万美元(P 值为 0.07),HD3 的差异具有统计学意义(差异为 6.5 万美元,P 值为 0.02)。HD2 和 HD3 采用手术治疗的中位住院日分别为 7 天和 6 天,而采用非手术治疗的中位住院日分别为 2 天和 3 天(P 值分别小于 0.001 和 0.01)。从基线到 HD4,非手术治疗失败的患者比例没有变化(23% (95% CI 19.7, 26.3) vs 33.9% (95% CI 28.3, 39.6),P 值<.001)。持续非手术治疗超过 4 天会导致高失败率和更高的手术费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bile Duct Injuries During Urgent Cholecystectomy at a Safety Net Teaching Hospital: Attending Experience and Time of Day May Matter. From Bytes to Best Practices: Tracing ChatGPT-3.5's Evolution and Alignment With the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Management. The USCENTCOM Walking Blood Bank Performance Benchmark and Anticipated Benefit of Universal Low Titer Type O Screening. Contemporary Outcomes and Patterns of Injury Associated With Parachuting Accidents. To Drain or Not: Drainage Procedures Remain a Central Tenet of Management of Infected Collections in Acute Pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1