{"title":"How globalization and type of energy consumption affects ecological footprint? An inter-continental panel quantile analysis","authors":"Mohammad Amin Shojaeenia","doi":"10.1007/s10668-024-04794-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As human strive towards a better future, it's become clear that the quality of the environment is one of the most critical factors. But how exactly does human consumption lifestyle impact the environment? That's where this study comes in. As a proxy for human consumption pressure on the environment, this study used the ecological footprint. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of clean and dirty energy consumption per capita and globalization on the ecological footprint using a panel quantile random− effect model across 90 countries during the period 1980–2020. The results indicate, Dirty energy consumption per capita (DEC) has a positive significant effect on ecological footprint. However, clean energy consumption per capita (CEC) has a positive but non− significant effect on the ecological footprint. In other words, the impact of pure energy consumption is much less than that of dirty energy consumption. For example, in the fifth decile, the estimated coefficient of CEC is 2.4, while the coefficient of DEC is 12.3. Globalization and economic growth also have positive effects on ecological footprint. In this regard, within the fifth decile, both the coefficients of globalization and economic growth stand at 0.003. Hence, promoting sustainable development with a focus on substituting clean energy with dirty ones is a viable policy approach to reduce the environmental burden caused by human consumption. Furthermore, by cutting back globalization and denouncing consumerism, we have the power to limit the growth of the Ecological Footprint.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":540,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","volume":"27 11","pages":"26587 - 26608"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-024-04794-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As human strive towards a better future, it's become clear that the quality of the environment is one of the most critical factors. But how exactly does human consumption lifestyle impact the environment? That's where this study comes in. As a proxy for human consumption pressure on the environment, this study used the ecological footprint. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of clean and dirty energy consumption per capita and globalization on the ecological footprint using a panel quantile random− effect model across 90 countries during the period 1980–2020. The results indicate, Dirty energy consumption per capita (DEC) has a positive significant effect on ecological footprint. However, clean energy consumption per capita (CEC) has a positive but non− significant effect on the ecological footprint. In other words, the impact of pure energy consumption is much less than that of dirty energy consumption. For example, in the fifth decile, the estimated coefficient of CEC is 2.4, while the coefficient of DEC is 12.3. Globalization and economic growth also have positive effects on ecological footprint. In this regard, within the fifth decile, both the coefficients of globalization and economic growth stand at 0.003. Hence, promoting sustainable development with a focus on substituting clean energy with dirty ones is a viable policy approach to reduce the environmental burden caused by human consumption. Furthermore, by cutting back globalization and denouncing consumerism, we have the power to limit the growth of the Ecological Footprint.
期刊介绍:
Environment, Development and Sustainability is an international and multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of the environmental impacts of socio-economic development. It is also concerned with the complex interactions which occur between development and environment, and its purpose is to seek ways and means for achieving sustainability in all human activities aimed at such development. The subject matter of the journal includes the following and related issues:
-mutual interactions among society, development and environment, and their implications for sustainable development
-technical, economic, ethical and philosophical aspects of sustainable development
-global sustainability - the obstacles and ways in which they could be overcome
-local and regional sustainability initiatives, their practical implementation, and relevance for use in a wider context
-development and application of indicators of sustainability
-development, verification, implementation and monitoring of policies for sustainable development
-sustainable use of land, water, energy and biological resources in development
-impacts of agriculture and forestry activities on soil and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity
-effects of energy use and global climate change on development and sustainability
-impacts of population growth and human activities on food and other essential resources for development
-role of national and international agencies, and of international aid and trade arrangements in sustainable development
-social and cultural contexts of sustainable development
-role of education and public awareness in sustainable development
-role of political and economic instruments in sustainable development
-shortcomings of sustainable development and its alternatives.