“Now you know”: Reception of the religious studies scholar

Rebekka King
{"title":"“Now you know”: Reception of the religious studies scholar","authors":"Rebekka King","doi":"10.1177/00084298241239224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article interrogates the premises of the question “Does the scholar of religion have a particular role in promoting public and political knowledge and understanding of religion(s)?” by first asking, “In what contexts is the scholar of religion asked to have a role in promoting public and political knowledge and understanding of religion(s)?” Rebekka King argues that there are two hidden assumptions underlying the question. First is the idea that somewhere buried in the request for scholarly input is a public perception of scholars as receptacles of knowledge (i.e. they are the ones who know). Second, this special issue’s larger question betrays assumptions about scholars’ abilities and (perhaps more interestingly) what scholars think about their colleagues’ abilities to promote public and political knowledge and understanding of religion(s). In both cases, it is possible to learn a lot about the role religious studies scholars might play by first considering the roles they are expected to play. In this vein, one might ask how the scholar of religion is classified and categorized in the minds of those who might invite them to play a role in public and political discourses, and how this classification resembles and departs from how scholars of religion classify themselves.","PeriodicalId":514407,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","volume":"33 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298241239224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article interrogates the premises of the question “Does the scholar of religion have a particular role in promoting public and political knowledge and understanding of religion(s)?” by first asking, “In what contexts is the scholar of religion asked to have a role in promoting public and political knowledge and understanding of religion(s)?” Rebekka King argues that there are two hidden assumptions underlying the question. First is the idea that somewhere buried in the request for scholarly input is a public perception of scholars as receptacles of knowledge (i.e. they are the ones who know). Second, this special issue’s larger question betrays assumptions about scholars’ abilities and (perhaps more interestingly) what scholars think about their colleagues’ abilities to promote public and political knowledge and understanding of religion(s). In both cases, it is possible to learn a lot about the role religious studies scholars might play by first considering the roles they are expected to play. In this vein, one might ask how the scholar of religion is classified and categorized in the minds of those who might invite them to play a role in public and political discourses, and how this classification resembles and departs from how scholars of religion classify themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"现在你知道了":接受宗教研究学者
本文对 "宗教学者在促进公众和政治对宗教的认识和理解方面是否具有特殊作用?"这一问题的前提进行了探讨,首先提出了 "在什么情况下,宗教学者被要求在促进公众和政治对宗教的认识和理解方面发挥作用?Rebekka King 认为,这个问题背后隐藏着两个假设。首先,在要求学者提供意见的过程中,公众认为学者是知识的容器(即他们是知识的拥有者)。其次,本特刊的大问题暴露了对学者能力的假设,以及(也许更有趣的是)学者对其同事促进公众和政治对宗教的认识和理解的能力的看法。在这两种情况下,首先考虑一下人们期望宗教研究学者扮演的角色,就有可能对他们可能扮演的角色有很多了解。在这种情况下,我们可能会问,在那些可能邀请宗教学者在公共和政治话语中发挥作用的人的心目中,宗教学者是如何被分类和归类的,这种分类与宗教学者对自己的分类有什么相似之处和不同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problems of Citation in the Study of Religion: Who Do We Cite and Why? Americanized discourses of religious freedom and Christian persecution during the 2022 Ottawa trucker convoy Myth, identity and ableism: Jericho March becomes Canadian Marathon of Hope in the Freedom Convoy Life in abundance: Diet, Black health and spirituality in the Nation of Islam, 1930–1975 “Now you know”: Reception of the religious studies scholar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1