Efficacy of Landmark-Guided Transverse Abdominis Plane (LTAP) Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Monique Motta, Rachel Siretskiy, Azalia Avila, Shenae Samuels, Tamar Levene
{"title":"Efficacy of Landmark-Guided Transverse Abdominis Plane (LTAP) Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy.","authors":"Monique Motta, Rachel Siretskiy, Azalia Avila, Shenae Samuels, Tamar Levene","doi":"10.1177/00031348241241711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nOptimizing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery remains a challenge given the side effects of narcotics and the potential for abuse. While transversus abdominis plane block has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, such as decreased opioid consumption and pain scores among adult patients, there is limited data regarding its efficacy for pediatric patients. This study evaluates efficacy amongst pediatric patients undergoing landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) during laparoscopic appendectomy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective chart review of patients, ages 0-18 years old, who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis at a single institution from January 2021 to December 2022 was conducted. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Welch's t test were used to assess differences between the two cohorts for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results are statistically significant at P < .05.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 90 patients who met inclusion criteria, 40% (n = 36) underwent LTAP block. Those with LTAP block had a shorter average operative time than those without LTAP block (.6 vs .7 hours; P = .009). Similarly, patients with LTAP block had a shorter average time to discharge (4.1 vs 11.0 h; P = .039). There were no other statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes including narcotic use between both cohorts.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nLandmark-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks did not increase operative times yet reduced time to discharge for pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our institution. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between LTAP administration and postoperative narcotic consumption to make clinical recommendations.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":"66 1","pages":"31348241241711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241241711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Optimizing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery remains a challenge given the side effects of narcotics and the potential for abuse. While transversus abdominis plane block has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, such as decreased opioid consumption and pain scores among adult patients, there is limited data regarding its efficacy for pediatric patients. This study evaluates efficacy amongst pediatric patients undergoing landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) during laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients, ages 0-18 years old, who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis at a single institution from January 2021 to December 2022 was conducted. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Welch's t test were used to assess differences between the two cohorts for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results are statistically significant at P < .05. RESULTS Of the 90 patients who met inclusion criteria, 40% (n = 36) underwent LTAP block. Those with LTAP block had a shorter average operative time than those without LTAP block (.6 vs .7 hours; P = .009). Similarly, patients with LTAP block had a shorter average time to discharge (4.1 vs 11.0 h; P = .039). There were no other statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes including narcotic use between both cohorts. DISCUSSION Landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks did not increase operative times yet reduced time to discharge for pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our institution. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between LTAP administration and postoperative narcotic consumption to make clinical recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的小儿患者中使用地标引导腹横肌平面 (LTAP) 阻滞的疗效。
简介:鉴于麻醉剂的副作用和滥用的可能性,优化腹部手术患者的围术期镇痛仍然是一项挑战。虽然腹横肌平面阻滞已被证明能改善临床效果,如减少成人患者的阿片类药物用量和疼痛评分,但有关其对儿科患者疗效的数据却很有限。本研究评估了在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中接受地标引导下腹横肌平面(LTAP)阻滞的儿科患者的疗效。方法对 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在一家医疗机构接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的 0-18 岁无并发症阑尾炎患者进行了回顾性病历审查。分别使用皮尔逊卡方检验或费雪精确检验和韦尔奇 t 检验来评估两组间分类变量和连续变量的差异。结果 在符合纳入标准的 90 名患者中,40%(36 人)接受了 LTAP 阻断术。与未接受 LTAP 阻滞的患者相比,接受 LTAP 阻滞的患者平均手术时间更短(.6 小时 vs .7 小时;P = .009)。同样,LTAP阻滞患者的平均出院时间也更短(4.1 小时 vs 11.0 小时;P = .039)。讨论在本院接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的小儿患者,在标记引导下进行腹横肌平面阻滞不会增加手术时间,但却缩短了出院时间。需要更大规模的研究来评估LTAP给药与术后麻醉药消耗量之间的关系,从而提出临床建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bile Duct Injuries During Urgent Cholecystectomy at a Safety Net Teaching Hospital: Attending Experience and Time of Day May Matter. From Bytes to Best Practices: Tracing ChatGPT-3.5's Evolution and Alignment With the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Management. The USCENTCOM Walking Blood Bank Performance Benchmark and Anticipated Benefit of Universal Low Titer Type O Screening. Contemporary Outcomes and Patterns of Injury Associated With Parachuting Accidents. To Drain or Not: Drainage Procedures Remain a Central Tenet of Management of Infected Collections in Acute Pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1