Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study.

P. Kaenmuang, A. Navasakulpong, Sarayut L Geater, Sirikorn Densrisereekul, S. Juthong
{"title":"Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study.","authors":"P. Kaenmuang, A. Navasakulpong, Sarayut L Geater, Sirikorn Densrisereekul, S. Juthong","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe blood eosinophil count (BEC) is an effective biomarker for predicting inhaled corticosteroid responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).\n\n\nMethods\nA 12-month prospective observational study was conducted in patients with COPD. BEC was measured at enrolment, and after 6 and 12 months. Patients were classified into three groups according to their baseline BEC: <100, 100 - 299, and ≥300 cells/µL. We aimed to describe the patterns of blood eosinophil stability in patients with stable COPD and compare the exacerbation rates and other clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months.\n\n\nResults\nA total of 252 patients with COPD were included. The <100, 100 - 299, and ≥ 300 cells/μL groups consisted of 14.7, 38.9, and 46.4% of patients, respectively. BEC stability was highest (85%) in the ≥300 cells/μL group for both durations. The lowest stability was observed in the <100 cells/μL group at 57 and 46% after 6 and 12 months, respectively. The persistent ≥ 300 cells/μL group had a higher incidence of moderate-to-severe exacerbation (IRR 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-5.27, p value 0.023, as well as severe exacerbation (IRR 2.19, 95%CI: 1.39-3.45, p value 0.001). Other patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.\n\n\nConclusion\nBlood eosinophil levels had good stability in patients with COPD with BEC ≥300 cells/µL and was associated with a high risk of exacerbation in the persistent ≥300 cells/μL group. The variability of BEC was higher in patients with COPD with BEC <300 cells/µL.","PeriodicalId":10249,"journal":{"name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","volume":"64 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The blood eosinophil count (BEC) is an effective biomarker for predicting inhaled corticosteroid responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods A 12-month prospective observational study was conducted in patients with COPD. BEC was measured at enrolment, and after 6 and 12 months. Patients were classified into three groups according to their baseline BEC: <100, 100 - 299, and ≥300 cells/µL. We aimed to describe the patterns of blood eosinophil stability in patients with stable COPD and compare the exacerbation rates and other clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Results A total of 252 patients with COPD were included. The <100, 100 - 299, and ≥ 300 cells/μL groups consisted of 14.7, 38.9, and 46.4% of patients, respectively. BEC stability was highest (85%) in the ≥300 cells/μL group for both durations. The lowest stability was observed in the <100 cells/μL group at 57 and 46% after 6 and 12 months, respectively. The persistent ≥ 300 cells/μL group had a higher incidence of moderate-to-severe exacerbation (IRR 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-5.27, p value 0.023, as well as severe exacerbation (IRR 2.19, 95%CI: 1.39-3.45, p value 0.001). Other patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Blood eosinophil levels had good stability in patients with COPD with BEC ≥300 cells/µL and was associated with a high risk of exacerbation in the persistent ≥300 cells/μL group. The variability of BEC was higher in patients with COPD with BEC <300 cells/µL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寄生虫感染高发区慢性阻塞性肺病患者血液中嗜酸性粒细胞计数的稳定性与临床结果:一项前瞻性研究
背景血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)是预测慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者吸入皮质类固醇反应性的有效生物标志物。方法对慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了为期 12 个月的前瞻性观察研究。在入组时以及 6 个月和 12 个月后测量 BEC。根据基线 BEC 将患者分为三组:<100、100 - 299 和 ≥300 cells/µL。我们旨在描述病情稳定的慢性阻塞性肺病患者血液中嗜酸性粒细胞的稳定性模式,并比较6个月和12个月后的病情恶化率和其他临床结果。<100、100 - 299 和≥ 300 cells/μL 组分别占患者总数的 14.7%、38.9% 和 46.4%。≥300个细胞/μL组的BEC稳定性最高(85%)。<100个细胞/μL组的稳定性最低,6个月和12个月后分别为57%和46%。持续≥300 个细胞/μL 组的中度至重度恶化发生率较高(IRR 2.44,95% 置信区间(CI):1.13-5.27,P 值 0.023),重度恶化发生率也较高(IRR 2.19,95% 置信区间(CI):1.39-3.45,P 值 0.001)。结论在 BEC≥300 cells/µL 的 COPD 患者中,血嗜酸性粒细胞水平具有良好的稳定性,而在持续≥300 cells/μL 组中,血嗜酸性粒细胞水平与病情加重的高风险相关。在 BEC<300 cells/µL 的 COPD 患者中,BEC 的变异性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study. Sexual Orientation Health Disparities in Chronic Respiratory Disorders. COPD: Iron Deficiency and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With and Without Chronic Respiratory Failure. Impact of Bronchiectasis on COPD Severity and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as a Risk Factor in Individuals with a Heavy Smoking History. Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admissions, Health Status, and Behavioral Changes of Patients with COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1