Wilson curve modification in permanent dentition: a retrospective comparison between clear aligners and continuous archwire treatment

R. Lione, F. C. De Razza, F. Gazzani, P. Cozza, C. Pavoni
{"title":"Wilson curve modification in permanent dentition: a retrospective comparison between clear aligners and continuous archwire treatment","authors":"R. Lione, F. C. De Razza, F. Gazzani, P. Cozza, C. Pavoni","doi":"10.2319/101123-691.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To evaluate leveling of the Curve of Wilson (COW) by two different treatment appliances (clear aligners [CA] and continuous archwire fixed appliances [FA]) in a permanent dentition sample of patients.\n \n \n \n Digital casts of 40 patients (CA group = 20 patients; FA group = 20 patients) were collected. Angular values for COW, right and left vertical height difference of lower first molars, and linear distance between lower teeth and the WALA ridge were analyzed for pre- (T1), posttreatment (T2) and on final virtual (ClinCheck) models (T2-CC) of the CA group. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate significant intergroup differences (P < .05), while a paired t-test was used for posttreatment CA intragroup comparison.\n \n \n \n FA group showed better control of second molar crown positions compared to CA group (47-WALA = −0.2 ± 0.1 mm, 37-WALA = −0.6 ± 0.3 mm). No significant difference was detected for linear distance of lower first molars and the WALA ridge or for vertical height difference. CA group showed a greater reduction of distance between lower premolars and the WALA ridge (mean difference: –0.5 mm for both 45-WALA and 35-WALA; mean difference: −0.5 mm for 44-WALA, −0.6 mm for 34-WALA). Predictability for the CA group was high for every measurement (87% Right COW, 89% Left COW, 88% 46 Vertical Diff, 87% 36 Vertical Diff).\n \n \n \n Clear aligner and continuous archwire mechanics were effective in leveling COW. FA was more effective in changing crown position of lower second molars with respect to the WALA ridge, while CA provided a greater distance reduction between lower premolars and WALA ridges compared to FA.\n","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/101123-691.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate leveling of the Curve of Wilson (COW) by two different treatment appliances (clear aligners [CA] and continuous archwire fixed appliances [FA]) in a permanent dentition sample of patients. Digital casts of 40 patients (CA group = 20 patients; FA group = 20 patients) were collected. Angular values for COW, right and left vertical height difference of lower first molars, and linear distance between lower teeth and the WALA ridge were analyzed for pre- (T1), posttreatment (T2) and on final virtual (ClinCheck) models (T2-CC) of the CA group. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate significant intergroup differences (P < .05), while a paired t-test was used for posttreatment CA intragroup comparison. FA group showed better control of second molar crown positions compared to CA group (47-WALA = −0.2 ± 0.1 mm, 37-WALA = −0.6 ± 0.3 mm). No significant difference was detected for linear distance of lower first molars and the WALA ridge or for vertical height difference. CA group showed a greater reduction of distance between lower premolars and the WALA ridge (mean difference: –0.5 mm for both 45-WALA and 35-WALA; mean difference: −0.5 mm for 44-WALA, −0.6 mm for 34-WALA). Predictability for the CA group was high for every measurement (87% Right COW, 89% Left COW, 88% 46 Vertical Diff, 87% 36 Vertical Diff). Clear aligner and continuous archwire mechanics were effective in leveling COW. FA was more effective in changing crown position of lower second molars with respect to the WALA ridge, while CA provided a greater distance reduction between lower premolars and WALA ridges compared to FA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恒牙的威尔逊曲线修正:透明矫治器与连续弓丝治疗的回顾性比较
评估两种不同矫治器(透明矫治器[CA]和连续弓丝固定矫治器[FA])对恒牙列患者威尔逊曲线(COW)的矫治效果。 收集了 40 名患者(CA 组 20 名;FA 组 20 名)的数字化模型。分析了CA组治疗前(T1)、治疗后(T2)和最终虚拟(ClinCheck)模型(T2-CC)的COW角度值、下第一磨牙左右垂直高度差和下牙与WALA嵴之间的线性距离。组间差异显著(P < .05)时采用非配对 t 检验,治疗后 CA 组内差异显著(P < .05)时采用配对 t 检验。 与 CA 组相比,FA 组对第二磨牙牙冠位置的控制更好(47-WALA = -0.2 ± 0.1 mm,37-WALA = -0.6 ± 0.3 mm)。下第一磨牙与WALA嵴的线性距离或垂直高度差均无明显差异。CA 组的下前臼齿与 WALA 牙脊之间的距离缩小幅度更大(45-WALA 和 37-WALA 的平均差异为 -0.5 mm):45-WALA和35-WALA的平均差异为-0.5毫米;44-WALA的平均差异为-0.5毫米:44-WALA为-0.5毫米,34-WALA为-0.6毫米)。CA组每次测量的可预测性都很高(右侧COW为87%,左侧COW为89%,46 Vertical Diff为88%,36 Vertical Diff为87%)。 透明矫治器和连续弓丝技术能有效平整牙冠。FA在改变下第二磨牙牙冠相对于WALA牙脊的位置方面更为有效,而CA与FA相比,能更大程度地缩小下前磨牙与WALA牙脊之间的距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effect of clear twin block and traditional twin block on speech: a randomized clinical trial. Evaluation of automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using artificial intelligence models. More molar distal movement than pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography posterior space available at the root level in mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants. 3D printed indirect bonding trays: transfer accuracy of bar vs shell design in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Correlations of spheno-occipital synchondrosis, cervical vertebrae, midpalatal suture, and third molar maturation stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1