The scale of religious conservatism among Muslim students in Indonesia: A Rasch Analysis

Ahmad Jamin, Albertos Damni
{"title":"The scale of religious conservatism among Muslim students in Indonesia: A Rasch Analysis","authors":"Ahmad Jamin, Albertos Damni","doi":"10.4102/hts.v80i1.9134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to develop a ‘religious conservatism’ scale tailored for university students, employing the Rasch Analysis approach in a four-step process. Firstly, a psychometric scale comprising 29 unidimensional items was formulated based on a thorough literature review. Secondly, items generated from literature studies underwent validation, resulting in the retention of 23 items after eliminating irrelevant ones. Thirdly, a psychometric analysis was conducted using the Rasch Model Approach with a sample of 549 randomly selected students from three universities in Sumatra, Indonesia. In all, 15 items met the Rasch Analysis criteria, with unnecessary items removed because of logit value overlap. Fourthly, an empirical comparison of study results based on gender and student categories (first-year, second-year, junior and senior) was performed, revealing insights into the average logit level of student conservatism. As a result, the study identified the highest logit score based on gender criteria and student categories, contributing valuable information on the nuanced aspects of religious conservatism among university students. The development of this scale provides a valuable tool for future research exploring the dynamics of religious conservatism within the university context.Contribution: This research introduces a meticulously validated psychometric scale designed specifically for assessing religious conservatism among Islamic university students. Setting it apart from comparable studies, this scale demonstrates distinct advantages, such as its precise focus on the Islamic context, rigorous psychometric validation process, elimination of irrelevant items and contextual applicability within university settings. By providing researchers and educators with a more accurate tool, the scale facilitates a deeper understanding and targeted approach to addressing religious conservatism among Muslim students in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":502762,"journal":{"name":"HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies","volume":"192 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.9134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a ‘religious conservatism’ scale tailored for university students, employing the Rasch Analysis approach in a four-step process. Firstly, a psychometric scale comprising 29 unidimensional items was formulated based on a thorough literature review. Secondly, items generated from literature studies underwent validation, resulting in the retention of 23 items after eliminating irrelevant ones. Thirdly, a psychometric analysis was conducted using the Rasch Model Approach with a sample of 549 randomly selected students from three universities in Sumatra, Indonesia. In all, 15 items met the Rasch Analysis criteria, with unnecessary items removed because of logit value overlap. Fourthly, an empirical comparison of study results based on gender and student categories (first-year, second-year, junior and senior) was performed, revealing insights into the average logit level of student conservatism. As a result, the study identified the highest logit score based on gender criteria and student categories, contributing valuable information on the nuanced aspects of religious conservatism among university students. The development of this scale provides a valuable tool for future research exploring the dynamics of religious conservatism within the university context.Contribution: This research introduces a meticulously validated psychometric scale designed specifically for assessing religious conservatism among Islamic university students. Setting it apart from comparable studies, this scale demonstrates distinct advantages, such as its precise focus on the Islamic context, rigorous psychometric validation process, elimination of irrelevant items and contextual applicability within university settings. By providing researchers and educators with a more accurate tool, the scale facilitates a deeper understanding and targeted approach to addressing religious conservatism among Muslim students in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚穆斯林学生的宗教保守主义程度:拉施分析
本研究采用拉氏分析法,分四个步骤,旨在为大学生量身定制 "宗教保守主义 "量表。首先,在充分查阅文献的基础上,制定了由 29 个单维项目组成的心理测量量表。其次,对文献研究中产生的项目进行验证,在剔除无关项目后保留了 23 个项目。第三,采用 Rasch 模型法对随机抽取的印度尼西亚苏门答腊岛三所大学的 549 名学生进行了心理测量分析。共有 15 个项目符合 Rasch 分析标准,由于 logit 值重叠,删除了不必要的项目。第四,根据性别和学生类别(一年级、二年级、大三和大四)对研究结果进行了实证比较,揭示了学生保守主义的平均对数水平。结果,研究发现了基于性别标准和学生类别的最高对数得分,为了解大学生宗教保守主义的细微差别提供了有价值的信息。该量表的编制为今后探索大学背景下宗教保守主义动态的研究提供了宝贵的工具:本研究引入了一个经过精心验证的心理测量量表,专门用于评估伊斯兰大学生的宗教保守主义。与同类研究不同的是,该量表具有明显的优势,例如它对伊斯兰教背景的精确关注、严格的心理测量验证过程、剔除无关项目以及在大学环境中的适用性。通过为研究人员和教育工作者提供更准确的工具,该量表有助于加深理解并有针对性地解决印尼穆斯林学生的宗教保守主义问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Values of local wisdom in Rambu Solo’ from the perspective of Pentecostal spirituality and character education Old Testament hospitality as reciprocity, Adam Smith and business ethics Towards an eco-practical theology: An eschatological horizon of true hope Ukunyamezela yinkunzi: Exploring the perspectives of God in relation to our daily bread Black Theology and the unheard cry for impilo of people living with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1