Non-Invasive Specimen Collection in COVID-19 RT-PCR Testing: An Observational Study at an Indonesian Tertiary Hospital

Andika Chandra Putra, Jamal Zaini, R. A. Ningrum, A. Ridwanuloh, Herjuno Ari Nugroho, Ryan Haryo Setyawan, Idris, Ruby Setiawan, P. S. Sushadi, Ari Sulistyo Wulandari, A. Zannati, Indriawati, Eva Erdayani, Wahyuni, D. F. Agustiyanti, P. H. Wisnuwardhani, Zahrah Saniyyah, Budi Haryanto, A. R. H. Utomo, Novia Ayu Rahma Setyaputri
{"title":"Non-Invasive Specimen Collection in COVID-19 RT-PCR Testing: An Observational Study at an Indonesian Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Andika Chandra Putra, Jamal Zaini, R. A. Ningrum, A. Ridwanuloh, Herjuno Ari Nugroho, Ryan Haryo Setyawan, Idris, Ruby Setiawan, P. S. Sushadi, Ari Sulistyo Wulandari, A. Zannati, Indriawati, Eva Erdayani, Wahyuni, D. F. Agustiyanti, P. H. Wisnuwardhani, Zahrah Saniyyah, Budi Haryanto, A. R. H. Utomo, Novia Ayu Rahma Setyaputri","doi":"10.2174/0126667975302062240328050110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCOVID-19 is a disease of SARS-CoV2 beta coronavirus infection. One way\nto control the progression of COVID-19 symptoms is a rapid and accurate diagnosis. The current\ngold standard of COVID-19 diagnostic method uses RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and\nsputum specimens.\n\n\n\nTo assess the efficacy of saliva and rectal swabs as non-invasive alternatives to the conventional\nnasopharyngeal swab for RTPCR testing in COVID-19 diagnosis, with a focus on the potential\nbenefits for healthcare providers and patient comfort.\n\n\n\nThis observational study was conducted with 80 confirmed cases at a tertiary hospital in\nIndonesia, the study compared RTPCR positivity rates among different collection methods.\n\n\n\nA high positivity rate of 92% for nasopharyngeal swabs, with saliva and rectal swabs yielding\n36% and 34%, respectively. Notably, the positivity rates for saliva and rectal samples increased\nto 60% and 50% when testing occurred between five to seven days post-symptom onset. Crucially, in\nolder patients, both saliva and rectal swabs demonstrated higher positivity rates than in younger patients\nwithin the initial four days of symptom onset, with rates of 43% and 17%, respectively. Furthermore,\na significant correlation was found between rectal swab positivity on day one and mortality\nin the older cohort, where lower Ct values on day seven were significantly associated with the\ndeceased group.\n\n\n\nThese findings support the potential of saliva and rectal swabs in predicting disease\nseverity and patient outcomes, suggesting a safer and more convenient testing strategy for COVID-\n19.\n","PeriodicalId":504431,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"31 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975302062240328050110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 is a disease of SARS-CoV2 beta coronavirus infection. One way to control the progression of COVID-19 symptoms is a rapid and accurate diagnosis. The current gold standard of COVID-19 diagnostic method uses RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and sputum specimens. To assess the efficacy of saliva and rectal swabs as non-invasive alternatives to the conventional nasopharyngeal swab for RTPCR testing in COVID-19 diagnosis, with a focus on the potential benefits for healthcare providers and patient comfort. This observational study was conducted with 80 confirmed cases at a tertiary hospital in Indonesia, the study compared RTPCR positivity rates among different collection methods. A high positivity rate of 92% for nasopharyngeal swabs, with saliva and rectal swabs yielding 36% and 34%, respectively. Notably, the positivity rates for saliva and rectal samples increased to 60% and 50% when testing occurred between five to seven days post-symptom onset. Crucially, in older patients, both saliva and rectal swabs demonstrated higher positivity rates than in younger patients within the initial four days of symptom onset, with rates of 43% and 17%, respectively. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between rectal swab positivity on day one and mortality in the older cohort, where lower Ct values on day seven were significantly associated with the deceased group. These findings support the potential of saliva and rectal swabs in predicting disease severity and patient outcomes, suggesting a safer and more convenient testing strategy for COVID- 19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 RT-PCR 检测中的非侵入性标本采集:印度尼西亚一家三级医院的观察性研究
COVID-19 是一种 SARS-CoV2 beta 冠状病毒感染疾病。快速准确的诊断是控制 COVID-19 症状发展的方法之一。为了评估唾液拭子和直肠拭子作为传统鼻咽拭子 RTPCR 检测的非侵入性替代品在 COVID-19 诊断中的有效性,重点关注其对医护人员的潜在益处和患者的舒适度。鼻咽拭子的阳性率高达 92%,唾液和直肠拭子的阳性率分别为 36% 和 34%。值得注意的是,在症状出现后 5 至 7 天进行检测时,唾液和直肠样本的阳性率分别升至 60% 和 50%。更重要的是,与年轻患者相比,年龄较大的患者在症状出现后最初四天内的唾液和直肠拭子阳性率更高,分别为 43% 和 17%。这些研究结果支持唾液和直肠拭子在预测疾病严重程度和患者预后方面的潜力,为 COVID-19 提出了一种更安全、更方便的检测策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review on Mpox: Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatments Changes in the Global Mortality Rate Over Time in Association with the COVID-19 Pandemic Until 2032 Computational Design of Peptide Inhibitors Targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Spectrum of Respiratory Viruses Among Returning Iranian Pilgrims with Respiratory Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 2022 Study Medical records data and in silico analysis provide new insights about COVID-19 in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1