Jennifer A. Locke, S. Neu, Joanne Lawrence, S. Herschorn
{"title":"Pilot study to assess the feasibility of self-administered, low-dose methoxyflurane for cystoscopic procedures.","authors":"Jennifer A. Locke, S. Neu, Joanne Lawrence, S. Herschorn","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nMethoxyflurane (MEOF) (Penthrox™) is an inhaled, self-administered, non-opioid analgesic approved by Health Canada for the short-term relief of moderate to severe acute pain associated with trauma or interventional medical procedures. In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of using MEOF as an anesthetic agent in 11 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopic procedures.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe average duration of the procedure was 24 (range 20-35) minutes and this included 10 minutes of administration time of the drug and five minutes of wait time before the procedure. The average monitoring time from start to end of the procedure was 23 (range 20-35) minutes and this included 15 minutes of monitoring post-procedure. On a scale of 0-10, patients on average rated the pain 4/10 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6).\n\n\nRESULTS\nGlobal performance was on average 3/4 (SD 1.3) for the patients and 3/4 (SD 1.1) for the operator. Of the 11 patients, four reported adverse events; two experienced euphoria, one experienced dizziness, and one was unable to tolerate the medication. Two patients noted their adverse events to be of moderate intensity, while the other two were of mild intensity. None of the adverse events was deemed serious.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur findings in this pilot study provide proof of principle for the design of a randomized control trial to evaluate MEOF as an anesthetic in an outpatient cystoscopic procedural setting. As more urologic procedures are being performed in an outpatient setting, this may offer significant clinical benefit.","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":"24 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Methoxyflurane (MEOF) (Penthrox™) is an inhaled, self-administered, non-opioid analgesic approved by Health Canada for the short-term relief of moderate to severe acute pain associated with trauma or interventional medical procedures. In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of using MEOF as an anesthetic agent in 11 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopic procedures.
METHODS
The average duration of the procedure was 24 (range 20-35) minutes and this included 10 minutes of administration time of the drug and five minutes of wait time before the procedure. The average monitoring time from start to end of the procedure was 23 (range 20-35) minutes and this included 15 minutes of monitoring post-procedure. On a scale of 0-10, patients on average rated the pain 4/10 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6).
RESULTS
Global performance was on average 3/4 (SD 1.3) for the patients and 3/4 (SD 1.1) for the operator. Of the 11 patients, four reported adverse events; two experienced euphoria, one experienced dizziness, and one was unable to tolerate the medication. Two patients noted their adverse events to be of moderate intensity, while the other two were of mild intensity. None of the adverse events was deemed serious.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings in this pilot study provide proof of principle for the design of a randomized control trial to evaluate MEOF as an anesthetic in an outpatient cystoscopic procedural setting. As more urologic procedures are being performed in an outpatient setting, this may offer significant clinical benefit.