A Landscape Study to Determine the Innovation Mortality Rate in Health Technology Innovations Across the Globe

Sambhu Ramesh, Annie Nithyavathani J, Moinudeen Syed, Kavita Kachroo, Jitendra Kumar Sharma, A. Priyadarshini, Penta Sneha Latha, Sushmita Roy Chowdary
{"title":"A Landscape Study to Determine the Innovation Mortality Rate in Health Technology Innovations Across the Globe","authors":"Sambhu Ramesh, Annie Nithyavathani J, Moinudeen Syed, Kavita Kachroo, Jitendra Kumar Sharma, A. Priyadarshini, Penta Sneha Latha, Sushmita Roy Chowdary","doi":"10.31354/globalce.v6i2.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Health technology innovation encompasses many areas, such as medical devices, diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, digital health solutions, telemedicine, health informatics, and more. These innovations aim to enhance healthcare delivery, improve patient outcomes, increase access to services, reduce costs, and advance medical research.\nMethodology : We have analyzed health technology innovations reported between January 2011 and December 2022. Regulatory approval for the innovative products was determined based solely on official open-access websites of health agencies, disregarding information from company websites or third-party sources. The search process utilized identified innovation agencies and sources like Primary Health Care (Innovations were thoroughly examined from these sources, focusing on health technologies, and success was gauged through regulatory approval.\nResults : The WHO Compendium includes 200 health innovations primarily intended for low-resource settings, with the USA accounting for the highest number, followed by India, the only low- and middle-income country (LMIC) with significant innovations. However, 58% of the listed innovations did not obtain regulatory clearance. Medical devices dominated the listed innovations, while scalable assistive technologies were limited. Global innovation agencies, particularly Grand Challenges, supported many innovations, but the regulatory approval rate remained low. In India, BIRAC supported 92% of the mapped innovations, with a similar trend of low regulatory approval rates.\nConclusion: The study observed the highest number of innovations during 2015-2017, with medical devices being the most prominent category. However, most innovations from both global and domestic agencies were unapproved, raising concerns about regulatory clearance for these health technologies.\nManuscript Highlights: The manuscript presents several important highlights concerning health technology innovation and regulatory approval. It highlights the evaluation of health innovations from 2015 to 2022, focusing on their success rate based on health agency approval. It reveals an uneven distribution of innovations from different countries and emphasizes the need for critical interventions to improve the process. This study emphasizes the significance of innovations in achieving healthcare equity and sustainable development goals.","PeriodicalId":318587,"journal":{"name":"Global Clinical Engineering Journal","volume":"100 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Clinical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v6i2.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : Health technology innovation encompasses many areas, such as medical devices, diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, digital health solutions, telemedicine, health informatics, and more. These innovations aim to enhance healthcare delivery, improve patient outcomes, increase access to services, reduce costs, and advance medical research. Methodology : We have analyzed health technology innovations reported between January 2011 and December 2022. Regulatory approval for the innovative products was determined based solely on official open-access websites of health agencies, disregarding information from company websites or third-party sources. The search process utilized identified innovation agencies and sources like Primary Health Care (Innovations were thoroughly examined from these sources, focusing on health technologies, and success was gauged through regulatory approval. Results : The WHO Compendium includes 200 health innovations primarily intended for low-resource settings, with the USA accounting for the highest number, followed by India, the only low- and middle-income country (LMIC) with significant innovations. However, 58% of the listed innovations did not obtain regulatory clearance. Medical devices dominated the listed innovations, while scalable assistive technologies were limited. Global innovation agencies, particularly Grand Challenges, supported many innovations, but the regulatory approval rate remained low. In India, BIRAC supported 92% of the mapped innovations, with a similar trend of low regulatory approval rates. Conclusion: The study observed the highest number of innovations during 2015-2017, with medical devices being the most prominent category. However, most innovations from both global and domestic agencies were unapproved, raising concerns about regulatory clearance for these health technologies. Manuscript Highlights: The manuscript presents several important highlights concerning health technology innovation and regulatory approval. It highlights the evaluation of health innovations from 2015 to 2022, focusing on their success rate based on health agency approval. It reveals an uneven distribution of innovations from different countries and emphasizes the need for critical interventions to improve the process. This study emphasizes the significance of innovations in achieving healthcare equity and sustainable development goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定全球医疗技术创新死亡率的景观研究
导言:医疗技术创新包括许多领域,如医疗设备、诊断、制药、数字医疗解决方案、远程医疗、健康信息学等。方法:我们分析了 2011 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月间报道的医疗技术创新。创新产品的监管批准完全基于卫生机构的官方开放网站,不考虑公司网站或第三方来源的信息。搜索过程中利用了已确定的创新机构和初级卫生保健(Primary Health Care)等来源,对这些来源的创新产品进行了深入研究,重点关注卫生技术,并通过监管批准来衡量成功与否。然而,58%的创新并未获得监管部门的批准。医疗设备在所列创新中占主导地位,而可扩展的辅助技术则很有限。全球创新机构,特别是 "大挑战",为许多创新提供了支持,但监管审批率仍然很低。在印度,BIRAC 支持了 92% 的映射创新,监管批准率低的趋势与此类似:研究观察到,2015-2017 年期间的创新数量最多,其中医疗器械是最突出的类别。然而,来自全球和国内机构的大多数创新都未获批准,这引起了人们对这些医疗技术监管审批的担忧:手稿介绍了有关卫生技术创新和监管审批的几个重要亮点。稿件重点介绍了对2015年至2022年卫生创新的评估,重点关注卫生机构审批的成功率。它揭示了不同国家的创新分布不均,并强调需要采取关键干预措施来改善这一过程。本研究强调了创新在实现医疗公平和可持续发展目标方面的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthcare Providers’ Readiness to Address Medical Device Cybersecurity within the Irish Healthcare System Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context - Part 3 A Landscape Study to Determine the Innovation Mortality Rate in Health Technology Innovations Across the Globe Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context - Part 2 Application of statistical processes control for the performance improvement of a clinical engineering department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1