Event-related Factors, Altruism, and Substance Use in Traumatization of Hurricane Student Volunteers: A Bayesian Model for the Follow-up Running Head: Bayesian Analysis of Disaster Traumatization

Wenyi Li, Amy L. Ai
{"title":"Event-related Factors, Altruism, and Substance Use in Traumatization of Hurricane Student Volunteers: A Bayesian Model for the Follow-up Running Head: Bayesian Analysis of Disaster Traumatization","authors":"Wenyi Li, Amy L. Ai","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v13n2p107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In surging disaster research, trauma psychologists called for more longitudinal investigation on factors related to resilience/lower traumatization for populations exposed to collective trauma. Little research has employed a Bayesian approach, a means with advantages in small samples and dichotomized endpoints. The present study addressed these needs with a two-wave survey on hurricane volunteers to demonstrate pathways to traumatization after deadly disasters. A survey was conducted at three months (Wave-1) and six months (Wave-2) after hurricane Katrina and Rita (H-KR) (N=201). Standardized instruments were used to assess posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) altruism, substance use for coping, and event-related factors in Wave-1 and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Wave-2. Bayesian structural equation modeling (Bayesian-SEM) was performed to evaluate the role of altruism and using substances to cope with Wave-2 PTSD. Traumatization was identified in 18% of participants, showing a significant increase in Wave-1 and a 12% decrease, albeit non-significant, in Wave-2. Supported by all Model fit indices, the final solution of Bayesian-SEM showed no direct overtime effect of altruism and substance use, but the indirect effects through the enhancing role of Waves-1 PTSS, on Wave-2 PTSD. Contrary to cross-sectional studies, no protection from peritraumatic positive emotions was observed. These findings emphasize the importance of longitudinal post-disaster research. Given the new evidence on volunteers' traumatization, altruism, and substance use during times of crisis with limited resources, further investigation among volunteers is crucial. The absence of identified protective factors in volunteers raises concerns for future implications in trauma psychology theory, research, and practice.","PeriodicalId":510213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Higher Education","volume":"45 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v13n2p107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In surging disaster research, trauma psychologists called for more longitudinal investigation on factors related to resilience/lower traumatization for populations exposed to collective trauma. Little research has employed a Bayesian approach, a means with advantages in small samples and dichotomized endpoints. The present study addressed these needs with a two-wave survey on hurricane volunteers to demonstrate pathways to traumatization after deadly disasters. A survey was conducted at three months (Wave-1) and six months (Wave-2) after hurricane Katrina and Rita (H-KR) (N=201). Standardized instruments were used to assess posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) altruism, substance use for coping, and event-related factors in Wave-1 and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Wave-2. Bayesian structural equation modeling (Bayesian-SEM) was performed to evaluate the role of altruism and using substances to cope with Wave-2 PTSD. Traumatization was identified in 18% of participants, showing a significant increase in Wave-1 and a 12% decrease, albeit non-significant, in Wave-2. Supported by all Model fit indices, the final solution of Bayesian-SEM showed no direct overtime effect of altruism and substance use, but the indirect effects through the enhancing role of Waves-1 PTSS, on Wave-2 PTSD. Contrary to cross-sectional studies, no protection from peritraumatic positive emotions was observed. These findings emphasize the importance of longitudinal post-disaster research. Given the new evidence on volunteers' traumatization, altruism, and substance use during times of crisis with limited resources, further investigation among volunteers is crucial. The absence of identified protective factors in volunteers raises concerns for future implications in trauma psychology theory, research, and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飓风中学生志愿者创伤的事件相关因素、利他主义和物质使用:用于后续研究的贝叶斯模型 跑题:灾难创伤的贝叶斯分析
在汹涌澎湃的灾难研究中,创伤心理学家呼吁对遭受集体创伤的人群进行更多纵向调查,以了解与恢复力/降低创伤程度相关的因素。很少有研究采用贝叶斯方法,这种方法在小样本和二分法终点方面具有优势。本研究针对这些需求,对飓风志愿者进行了两波调查,以展示致命灾难后的创伤途径。在卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风(H-KR)后三个月(第一波)和六个月(第二波)进行了调查(N=201)。在第一轮调查中,使用标准化工具评估了创伤后应激症状(PTSS)利他主义、使用药物应对和事件相关因素;在第二轮调查中,使用标准化工具评估了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。贝叶斯结构方程模型(Bayesian-SEM)用于评估利他主义和使用药物来应对第 2 波创伤后应激障碍的作用。18%的参与者出现创伤,在第1波中显著增加,在第2波中减少了12%,尽管并不显著。在所有模型拟合指数的支持下,贝叶斯-SEM 的最终解决方案显示,利他主义和药物使用没有直接的超时效应,但通过第 1 波创伤后应激障碍的增强作用,对第 2 波创伤后应激障碍产生了间接效应。与横断面研究相反,没有观察到创伤周围积极情绪的保护作用。这些发现强调了灾后纵向研究的重要性。鉴于有新的证据表明,在资源有限的危机时期,志愿者会出现创伤、利他主义和药物使用等问题,因此在志愿者中开展进一步调查至关重要。志愿者中缺乏已确定的保护因素,这引起了人们对创伤心理学理论、研究和实践未来影响的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Technology in Classrooms in the Colleges of Kathmandu: Challenges and Policy Recommendations Exploring Extra-Curricular Bootcamps: A Qualitative Study on Accelerated Learning in Higher Education Proyecto Slam : The Didactic Side of Slams Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2024 Addressing Gender-Based Violence through the ERA Policy Framework: A Systemic Solution to Dilemmas and Contestations for Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1