Motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish one’s own from a partner’s contributions to a joint action

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108804
Nicole K. Bolt, Janeen D. Loehr
{"title":"Motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish one’s own from a partner’s contributions to a joint action","authors":"Nicole K. Bolt,&nbsp;Janeen D. Loehr","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to distinguish between one’s own and others’ actions is a requirement for successful joint action. Such a distinction might be supported by dissociable motor activity underlying each partner’s individual contributions to the joint action. However, little research has directly compared motor activity associated with one’s own vs. others’ actions during joint action. The current study investigated whether motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish between self- and partner-produced actions when partners take turns producing taps to meet a joint timing goal. Across two experiments, the degree of beta suppression differentiated one’s own from a partner’s actions, with more suppression occurring during one’s own actions than during a partner’s actions. Self-partner differences in mu suppression were also evident, particularly when partners produced actions in succession. Increased beta suppression was also observed during partners’ actions when they were followed by one’s own actions, suggesting that the coordination demands imposed by the joint action could affect the pattern of beta reactivity during a turn-taking joint action. Together, these findings demonstrate that dynamic patterns of motor activity underpin successful joint action and that periods of distinct motor activity are associated with one’s own contributions to a joint action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000632/pdfft?md5=0dc490f5aa26aa5d2b06312245c2f1d8&pid=1-s2.0-S0301051124000632-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to distinguish between one’s own and others’ actions is a requirement for successful joint action. Such a distinction might be supported by dissociable motor activity underlying each partner’s individual contributions to the joint action. However, little research has directly compared motor activity associated with one’s own vs. others’ actions during joint action. The current study investigated whether motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish between self- and partner-produced actions when partners take turns producing taps to meet a joint timing goal. Across two experiments, the degree of beta suppression differentiated one’s own from a partner’s actions, with more suppression occurring during one’s own actions than during a partner’s actions. Self-partner differences in mu suppression were also evident, particularly when partners produced actions in succession. Increased beta suppression was also observed during partners’ actions when they were followed by one’s own actions, suggesting that the coordination demands imposed by the joint action could affect the pattern of beta reactivity during a turn-taking joint action. Together, these findings demonstrate that dynamic patterns of motor activity underpin successful joint action and that periods of distinct motor activity are associated with one’s own contributions to a joint action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与运动相关的皮层振荡能区分自己和伙伴对共同行动的贡献
区分自己和他人行动的能力是联合行动取得成功的必要条件。在联合行动中,每个伙伴各自所做贡献的背后都有可分离的运动活动,这可能会支持这种区分。然而,很少有研究直接比较在联合行动中与自己和他人的行动相关的运动活动。本研究调查了当搭档轮流敲击以达到共同的计时目标时,与运动相关的皮层振荡是否会区分自己和搭档产生的动作。在两次实验中,β抑制的程度区分了自己和伙伴的动作,在自己的动作中比在伙伴的动作中出现更多的抑制。自己和同伴在μ抑制上的差异也很明显,尤其是当同伴连续做出动作时。当自己的行动紧接着伙伴的行动时,在伙伴的行动中也观察到了更多的β抑制,这表明联合行动所施加的协调要求可能会影响轮流联合行动中的β反应模式。这些发现共同表明,运动活动的动态模式是联合行动成功的基础,而独特的运动活动期与自己对联合行动的贡献有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of threat of shock on memory for threat-irrelevant information: Evidence for a role of reduced semantic organization. The association between interoception and olfactory affective responses. Corrigendum to: "Neural mechanisms of inhibitory control in preadolescent irritability: Insights from the ABCD study" [Biological Psychology 192 (2024) 108856]. Decreased inter-hemispheric connectivity predicts a coherent retrieval of auditory symbolic material. Subjective Cognitive Decline is associated with altered patterns of brain activity and connectivity during performance of an old/new recognition memory task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1