Scientific and Technological Advances as Current Challenges to the Biological Weapons Non-Proliferation Regime

D. L. Poklonskii
{"title":"Scientific and Technological Advances as Current Challenges to the Biological Weapons Non-Proliferation Regime","authors":"D. L. Poklonskii","doi":"10.35825/2587-5728-2023-7-4-308-318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent advances in biological sciences and biotechnology have resulted in new knowledge and capabilities that  challenge existing understandings of biological threats and biological weapons (BW). The purpose of the article is to  evaluate scientific and engineering decisions that pose potential challenges to the biological weapons non-proliferation  regime and can reduce barriers to their development, production and use. Materials and methods. The scientific articles  available through the PubMed, Google Scholar and Russian Electronic Library databases were used in the research.  The method of analysis is the description. The results of the research. The success of biotechnology provides impetus for  experimentation with biological weapons, particularly by non-state actors such as terrorist organizations and extremist  groups. Transformative changes are occurring in areas not directly related to microbiology. However, the potential for  their malicious use is no less of a concern than the development, production and stockpiling of biological weapons.  The transformation of the concept of «biological threat» is traced. It becomes more complex and includes elements  from other fields outside of biotechnology and the traditional understanding of biological weapons. In addition to  biotechnology and synthetic biology, such technologies that are directly related to the BTWC issue, may include:  additive manufacturing based on 3D printing technologies; big data analysis and artificial intelligence technologies;  nanotechnology and materials science, as well as biological research automation and robotics. Conclusion. Many dual-use technologies have received close attention from the scientific community and international experts, but this does  not always contribute to an accurate and balanced understanding of their potential in the context of BTWC issues. The  convergence of new and emerging disciplines is creating new areas of scientific knowledge that address the problem of  non-proliferation of biological weapons, which requires the expert community to make a balanced assessment from  the point of view of both dual use and the risk of excessive prohibition and negative impact on further scientific and  technological progress.","PeriodicalId":16578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NBC Protection Corps","volume":"324 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NBC Protection Corps","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35825/2587-5728-2023-7-4-308-318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent advances in biological sciences and biotechnology have resulted in new knowledge and capabilities that  challenge existing understandings of biological threats and biological weapons (BW). The purpose of the article is to  evaluate scientific and engineering decisions that pose potential challenges to the biological weapons non-proliferation  regime and can reduce barriers to their development, production and use. Materials and methods. The scientific articles  available through the PubMed, Google Scholar and Russian Electronic Library databases were used in the research.  The method of analysis is the description. The results of the research. The success of biotechnology provides impetus for  experimentation with biological weapons, particularly by non-state actors such as terrorist organizations and extremist  groups. Transformative changes are occurring in areas not directly related to microbiology. However, the potential for  their malicious use is no less of a concern than the development, production and stockpiling of biological weapons.  The transformation of the concept of «biological threat» is traced. It becomes more complex and includes elements  from other fields outside of biotechnology and the traditional understanding of biological weapons. In addition to  biotechnology and synthetic biology, such technologies that are directly related to the BTWC issue, may include:  additive manufacturing based on 3D printing technologies; big data analysis and artificial intelligence technologies;  nanotechnology and materials science, as well as biological research automation and robotics. Conclusion. Many dual-use technologies have received close attention from the scientific community and international experts, but this does  not always contribute to an accurate and balanced understanding of their potential in the context of BTWC issues. The  convergence of new and emerging disciplines is creating new areas of scientific knowledge that address the problem of  non-proliferation of biological weapons, which requires the expert community to make a balanced assessment from  the point of view of both dual use and the risk of excessive prohibition and negative impact on further scientific and  technological progress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科技进步是当前生物武器不扩散制度面临的挑战
生物科学和生物技术的最新进展带来了新的知识和能力,对生物威胁和生物武器(BW)的现有认识提出了挑战。本文旨在评估对生物武器不扩散制度构成潜在挑战的科学和工程决策,并减少开发、生产和使用生物武器的障碍。材料和方法。研究使用了 PubMed、Google Scholar 和俄罗斯电子图书馆数据库中的科学文章。 分析方法为描述法。研究结果。生物技术的成功为生物武器实验提供了动力,尤其是恐怖组织和极端主义团体等非国家行为者。与微生物学没有直接关系的领域正在发生变革。然而,与开发、生产和储存生物武器相比,恶意使用这些武器的可能性同样令人担忧。 生物威胁 "概念的转变有迹可循。它变得更加复杂,并包含了生物技术和对生物武器的传统理解之外的其他领域的因素。除生物技术和合成生物学外,与《生物和毒素武器公约》问题直接相关的技术可能包括:基于三维打印技术的增材制造;大数据分析和人工智能技术;纳米技术和材料科学,以及生物研究自动化和机器人技术。结论。许多军民两用技术得到了科学界和国际专家的密切关注,但这并不总是有助于准确和平衡地理解它们在《生物和毒素武器公约》问题方面的潜力。新学科和新兴学科的汇聚正在创造解决生物武器不扩散问题的新科学知识领域,这就要求专家界从双重用途和过度禁止的风险以及对进一步科技进步的负面影响这两个角度进行平衡评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Bioinformatics Solutions Used for Genetic Data Analysis Approbation of the Technology for Constructing Means of Express Indication of New Especially Dangerous Sublines of Omicron Genovariant of SARS-CoV-2 Virus as Potential Dominant Agents of New Rises of COVID-19 Morbidity in Russia Flamethrower Operators and Flamethrowers. Historic Research. Peer Review The Assessment of the Danger of Pathogens of Zoonotic Viral Infections as Potential Agents of Pandemics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1