Predictive factors of frozen section in transoral microlaryngeal surgery for suspicious glottic lesions

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101434
Mateus Morais Aires , Fábio Yukio Pereira I , Camilla Diacópulos Silva , José Eduardo de Sá Pedroso , Noemi Grigoletto de Biase , Leonardo Haddad
{"title":"Predictive factors of frozen section in transoral microlaryngeal surgery for suspicious glottic lesions","authors":"Mateus Morais Aires ,&nbsp;Fábio Yukio Pereira I ,&nbsp;Camilla Diacópulos Silva ,&nbsp;José Eduardo de Sá Pedroso ,&nbsp;Noemi Grigoletto de Biase ,&nbsp;Leonardo Haddad","doi":"10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Frozen biopsy may guide surgical intraoperative decisions. We evaluated the accuracy of frozen biopsy for diagnosing benign, dysplastic and malignant laryngeal lesions, compared to paraffin section (gold standard).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective review of the charts of all patients presenting with laryngeal lesions suspicious of malignancy, who underwent laryngeal microsurgery with frozen biopsy in our institution, between 2015 and 2020. Results of frozen biopsy and paraffin section examinations were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 113 samples of 89 patients, paraffin section diagnosed 23 benign, 31 dysplastic and 59 malignant lesions. The accuracy of the frozen biopsy in identifying dysplasia or malignancy was 80.5% (91/113), and greater for lesions &gt;5 mm (78.8% × 51.5%; <em>p</em> = 0.009). The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity were 95.9%, 51.3%, 78.9% and 86.9%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Frozen section is a reliable tool when malignancy is detected, but almost half of benign results exhibit dysplasia or malignancy in paraffin section. Other clinical parameters should be considered in intraoperative decisions to prevent undertreatment.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>4.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49099,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869424000491/pdfft?md5=564ce6a75609aa5bc69f39f578aef8dc&pid=1-s2.0-S1808869424000491-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869424000491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Frozen biopsy may guide surgical intraoperative decisions. We evaluated the accuracy of frozen biopsy for diagnosing benign, dysplastic and malignant laryngeal lesions, compared to paraffin section (gold standard).

Methods

Retrospective review of the charts of all patients presenting with laryngeal lesions suspicious of malignancy, who underwent laryngeal microsurgery with frozen biopsy in our institution, between 2015 and 2020. Results of frozen biopsy and paraffin section examinations were compared.

Results

Among 113 samples of 89 patients, paraffin section diagnosed 23 benign, 31 dysplastic and 59 malignant lesions. The accuracy of the frozen biopsy in identifying dysplasia or malignancy was 80.5% (91/113), and greater for lesions >5 mm (78.8% × 51.5%; p = 0.009). The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity were 95.9%, 51.3%, 78.9% and 86.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

Frozen section is a reliable tool when malignancy is detected, but almost half of benign results exhibit dysplasia or malignancy in paraffin section. Other clinical parameters should be considered in intraoperative decisions to prevent undertreatment.

Level of evidence

4.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经口喉显微手术治疗可疑声门病变的冰冻切片预测因素
目的冷冻活检可为术中手术决策提供指导。与石蜡切片(金标准)相比,我们评估了冷冻活检诊断喉良性、发育不良和恶性病变的准确性。结果在89名患者的113个样本中,石蜡切片诊断出23个良性病变、31个发育不良病变和59个恶性病变。冷冻活检在确定发育不良或恶性病变方面的准确率为 80.5%(91/113),5 毫米病变的准确率更高(78.8% × 51.5%;P = 0.009)。阳性和阴性预测值、敏感性和特异性分别为 95.9%、51.3%、78.9% 和 86.9%。结论冷冻切片是检测恶性肿瘤的可靠工具,但几乎一半的良性结果在石蜡切片中表现为发育不良或恶性肿瘤。术中决策时应考虑其他临床参数,以防治疗不当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology publishes original contributions in otolaryngology and the associated areas (cranio-maxillo-facial surgery and phoniatrics). The aim of this journal is the national and international divulgation of the scientific production interesting to the otolaryngology, as well as the discussion, in editorials, of subjects of scientific, academic and professional relevance. The Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology is born from the Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, of which it is the English version, created and indexed by MEDLINE in 2005. It is the official scientific publication of the Brazilian Association of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery. Its abbreviated title is Braz J Otorhinolaryngol., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Brazilian Society of Otology task force – single sided deafness – recommendations based on strength of evidence Correlation between vestibular response to caloric stimulation and cochlear function in Ménière's disease Translation, adaptation, and validation of ASK nasal-12 into Brazilian Portuguese A case of extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma arising from nasal dorsum Evaluation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and Ki-67 index in aggressive papillary thyroid cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1