Factors That Influence the High Number of Elderly People Working in the Informal Sector

Laili Rahayuwati, Syahmida S Arsyad, R. Ekawati, Muhammad Dawam, R. Rahmadewi, Septi Nurhayati, Ikhsan Fahmi, Sherllina Rizqi Fauziah
{"title":"Factors That Influence the High Number of Elderly People Working in the Informal Sector","authors":"Laili Rahayuwati, Syahmida S Arsyad, R. Ekawati, Muhammad Dawam, R. Rahmadewi, Septi Nurhayati, Ikhsan Fahmi, Sherllina Rizqi Fauziah","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s450047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: As individuals age, they are expected to experience a natural progression that usually involves a slight and permanent decrease in bodily functions and physical abilities. Despite this, many older people remain active in the workforce. Purpose: This study seeks to explore the correlation between the health conditions, disabilities, social factors, and demographic circumstances of elderly individuals engaged in both formal and informal employment sectors. Methods: This study utilizes an observational analytical method with a cross-sectional structure. The participants in the research involved all individuals aged 60 years and above who met the outlined criteria, totaling 15,034,946 respondents. The data analysis was conducted using multivariate logistic regression in Model II. Results: Overall, most older adults are working in informal jobs. Moreover, most respondents are 60–69 years old, married, have a primary school certificate, own health insurance and a house, and live with family. In addition, the multivariate analysis shows the relationship between each variable and the informal sector working elderly. It is known that older women have a 1.45 times higher limited educational background, not having savings is 1.21 times, rural areas living 1.93 times, not being the head of the family is linked 1.34 times, poor health conditions are 1.01 times, and having a disability has a 1.20 times higher likelihood of informal-sector employment. Conclusion: Several variables are assigned as the determinants that increase the number of elderly working in informal sectors, including gender, education level, savings ownership, living areas, head of the family role, health status, and disability.","PeriodicalId":505971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s450047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: As individuals age, they are expected to experience a natural progression that usually involves a slight and permanent decrease in bodily functions and physical abilities. Despite this, many older people remain active in the workforce. Purpose: This study seeks to explore the correlation between the health conditions, disabilities, social factors, and demographic circumstances of elderly individuals engaged in both formal and informal employment sectors. Methods: This study utilizes an observational analytical method with a cross-sectional structure. The participants in the research involved all individuals aged 60 years and above who met the outlined criteria, totaling 15,034,946 respondents. The data analysis was conducted using multivariate logistic regression in Model II. Results: Overall, most older adults are working in informal jobs. Moreover, most respondents are 60–69 years old, married, have a primary school certificate, own health insurance and a house, and live with family. In addition, the multivariate analysis shows the relationship between each variable and the informal sector working elderly. It is known that older women have a 1.45 times higher limited educational background, not having savings is 1.21 times, rural areas living 1.93 times, not being the head of the family is linked 1.34 times, poor health conditions are 1.01 times, and having a disability has a 1.20 times higher likelihood of informal-sector employment. Conclusion: Several variables are assigned as the determinants that increase the number of elderly working in informal sectors, including gender, education level, savings ownership, living areas, head of the family role, health status, and disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响大量老年人在非正规部门工作的因素
目的:随着年龄的增长,人们预计身体机能和体能会出现轻微和永久性的衰退。尽管如此,许多老年人仍然活跃在工作岗位上。目的:本研究旨在探讨在正规和非正规就业部门工作的老年人的健康状况、残疾、社会因素和人口状况之间的相关性。研究方法本研究采用横截面结构的观察分析方法。研究对象包括所有符合概述标准的 60 岁及以上老年人,共计 15 034 946 名受访者。数据分析采用多元逻辑回归模型 II。研究结果总体而言,大多数老年人从事非正式工作。此外,大多数受访者年龄在 60-69 岁之间,已婚,有小学毕业证书,拥有医疗保险和住房,与家人同住。此外,多变量分析表明了每个变量与在非正规部门工作的老年人之间的关系。据此可知,老年妇女受教育背景有限的可能性高出 1.45 倍,没有储蓄的可能性高出 1.21 倍,居住在农村地区的可能性高出 1.93 倍,不是一家之主的可能性高出 1.34 倍,健康状况差的可能性高出 1.01 倍,残疾的可能性高出 1.20 倍。结论有几个变量被认为是增加在非正规部门工作的老年人数量的决定因素,包括性别、教育水平、拥有储蓄、居住地区、户主角色、健康状况和残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Summary of the Clinical Evidence for Non-Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Delirium in Adults: An Evidence Synthesis A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Used to Predict Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Drug Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic Effectiveness of Asthma Home Management Manual and Low-Cost Air Filter on Quality of Life Among Asthma Adults: A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial [Letter] “Diluting Its Value as a Word by Applying It to Everything”: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perspectives and Practices of Mindfulness Practitioners Acupuncture in Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Complementary Approach for Cardiovascular Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1