How to design a theranostic trial?

D. Siripongsatian, Quido G de Lussanet de la Sablonière, F. A. Verburg, T. Brabander
{"title":"How to design a theranostic trial?","authors":"D. Siripongsatian, Quido G de Lussanet de la Sablonière, F. A. Verburg, T. Brabander","doi":"10.1530/eo-23-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of nuclear theranostic clinical trials is continuously expanding as an increasing number of novel agents and treatment combinations are explored for treating advanced and metastatic cancers. Moving from ‘bench-to-bedside’ is oftentimes a complex and lengthy process. The objective of this overview is to explore the basic elements involved in designing clinical trials with a special focus on theranostics in nuclear medicine. The 'bench-to-bedside' journey involves translating basic scientific research into patient-effective treatments. Preclinical studies, a crucial initial step, are a complex process encompassing in vitro experiments, in vivo studies, and animal models to explore hypotheses in humans. Clinical trials follow, with predefined phases assessing safety, effectiveness, and comparisons to existing treatments. This process demands investments in data management, statistics, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) accreditations, and collaborative efforts for funding and sustainable pricing. Theranostics, merging diagnostics and personalized treatment, is at the forefront. Continuous efforts to enhance existing agents involve reducing adverse effects, exploring new indications, and incorporating advanced imaging modalities. Radionuclide therapy, unique with non-uniform distribution and complex radiobiology, plays a distinct role. This article explores trends and challenges in each clinical trial phase in light of the emerging field of theranostics in nuclear medicine, emphasizing meticulous trial design, dosimetry optimization, and the necessity of collaborative stakeholder efforts for successful implementation.","PeriodicalId":508879,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Oncology","volume":"266 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/eo-23-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of nuclear theranostic clinical trials is continuously expanding as an increasing number of novel agents and treatment combinations are explored for treating advanced and metastatic cancers. Moving from ‘bench-to-bedside’ is oftentimes a complex and lengthy process. The objective of this overview is to explore the basic elements involved in designing clinical trials with a special focus on theranostics in nuclear medicine. The 'bench-to-bedside' journey involves translating basic scientific research into patient-effective treatments. Preclinical studies, a crucial initial step, are a complex process encompassing in vitro experiments, in vivo studies, and animal models to explore hypotheses in humans. Clinical trials follow, with predefined phases assessing safety, effectiveness, and comparisons to existing treatments. This process demands investments in data management, statistics, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) accreditations, and collaborative efforts for funding and sustainable pricing. Theranostics, merging diagnostics and personalized treatment, is at the forefront. Continuous efforts to enhance existing agents involve reducing adverse effects, exploring new indications, and incorporating advanced imaging modalities. Radionuclide therapy, unique with non-uniform distribution and complex radiobiology, plays a distinct role. This article explores trends and challenges in each clinical trial phase in light of the emerging field of theranostics in nuclear medicine, emphasizing meticulous trial design, dosimetry optimization, and the necessity of collaborative stakeholder efforts for successful implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何设计治疗试验?
随着用于治疗晚期和转移性癌症的新型药物和治疗组合越来越多,核疗法临床试验领域也在不断扩大。从 "实验室到临床 "往往是一个复杂而漫长的过程。本综述旨在探讨设计临床试验所涉及的基本要素,并特别关注核医学中的治疗学。从实验室到临床 "的过程包括将基础科学研究转化为对患者有效的治疗方法。临床前研究是关键的第一步,是一个复杂的过程,包括体外实验、体内研究和动物模型,以探索人体假设。临床试验紧随其后,按照预先确定的阶段评估安全性、有效性以及与现有治疗方法的比较。这一过程需要在数据管理、统计、良好临床实践(GCP)认证以及合作筹资和可持续定价方面进行投资。将诊断与个性化治疗相结合的疗法(Theranostics)正处于最前沿。不断改进现有药物的工作包括减少不良反应、探索新的适应症以及采用先进的成像模式。放射性核素疗法因其分布不均匀和复杂的放射生物学特性,发挥着独特的作用。本文从核医学治疗学的新兴领域出发,探讨了每个临床试验阶段的趋势和挑战,强调了精心的试验设计、剂量学优化以及利益相关者通力合作以成功实施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to design a theranostic trial? SDHA secondary findings in germline testing: counseling and surveillance considerations Mönckeberg sclerosis in patients with thyroid papillary carcinoma MDM2 regulates the stability of AR, AR-V7, and TM4SF3 proteins in prostate cancer The GLP-1 receptor is expressed in vivo by human metastatic prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1