Proportion of intensive care unit patients receiving sedation after rapid sequence intubation with rocuronium

Joanna Dukes, Preeyaporn Sarangarm, Nicole Murtagh, Kevin A. Kaucher
{"title":"Proportion of intensive care unit patients receiving sedation after rapid sequence intubation with rocuronium","authors":"Joanna Dukes,&nbsp;Preeyaporn Sarangarm,&nbsp;Nicole Murtagh,&nbsp;Kevin A. Kaucher","doi":"10.1016/j.japhar.2024.100007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rocuronium has a longer duration of action than the sedative effects of induction agents used during rapid sequence intubation (RSI), introducing a potential window for inadequate sedation. When rocuronium is used for paralysis in the emergency department, delays in sedation have been observed, but have not been described in intensive care units (ICUs).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The primary objective is the proportion of patients in the ICU who received sedation within 15 minutes after intubation using rocuronium. Secondary objectives include (1) time to sedation (minutes), (2) time to sedation between ICUs (minutes), (3) time to sedation between provider specialties (minutes), (4) time to sedation by Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and (5) first-hour versus second-hour Sedation Intensity Score (SIS) after RSI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective review at a single academic tertiary care center of patients intubated in an ICU between July 2019 and August 2020. Inclusion criteria were age 18 to 89 years, intubation using rocuronium, and intubation in an ICU. Exclusion criteria were sedative exposure before intubation, no charted induction agent or charting delays from paralytic, incomplete charting, intubation outside an ICU, intubation during cardiac arrest, pregnancy, or incarceration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 192 intubations using rocuronium were included and 77 (40.1%) received sedation within 15 minutes of induction agent administration. There was no difference in proportion of patients receiving sedation by GCS ≤ 8 and GCS &gt; 8 before intubation (38.1% vs. 41.1%, <em>P</em> = 0.69). Using a SIS to describe amount of sedative administered, more sedation was administered in the second hour after intubation than the first hour (median score 5.5 [interquartile range {IQR} 0-20] vs. 4.5 [IQR 0-12.5], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this single-center analysis, a large proportion of patients intubated in ICUs with rocuronium did not receive additional sedation within 15 minutes of induction, exposing them to risk of awareness while paralyzed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100736,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Pharmacotherapy","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949962324000032/pdfft?md5=52094e0f34a9dd0f3422885bcc7587bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2949962324000032-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949962324000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rocuronium has a longer duration of action than the sedative effects of induction agents used during rapid sequence intubation (RSI), introducing a potential window for inadequate sedation. When rocuronium is used for paralysis in the emergency department, delays in sedation have been observed, but have not been described in intensive care units (ICUs).

Objectives

The primary objective is the proportion of patients in the ICU who received sedation within 15 minutes after intubation using rocuronium. Secondary objectives include (1) time to sedation (minutes), (2) time to sedation between ICUs (minutes), (3) time to sedation between provider specialties (minutes), (4) time to sedation by Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and (5) first-hour versus second-hour Sedation Intensity Score (SIS) after RSI.

Methods

This is a retrospective review at a single academic tertiary care center of patients intubated in an ICU between July 2019 and August 2020. Inclusion criteria were age 18 to 89 years, intubation using rocuronium, and intubation in an ICU. Exclusion criteria were sedative exposure before intubation, no charted induction agent or charting delays from paralytic, incomplete charting, intubation outside an ICU, intubation during cardiac arrest, pregnancy, or incarceration.

Results

A total of 192 intubations using rocuronium were included and 77 (40.1%) received sedation within 15 minutes of induction agent administration. There was no difference in proportion of patients receiving sedation by GCS ≤ 8 and GCS > 8 before intubation (38.1% vs. 41.1%, P = 0.69). Using a SIS to describe amount of sedative administered, more sedation was administered in the second hour after intubation than the first hour (median score 5.5 [interquartile range {IQR} 0-20] vs. 4.5 [IQR 0-12.5], P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In this single-center analysis, a large proportion of patients intubated in ICUs with rocuronium did not receive additional sedation within 15 minutes of induction, exposing them to risk of awareness while paralyzed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用罗库溴铵快速插管后接受镇静治疗的重症监护病房患者比例
背景与快速顺序插管(RSI)过程中使用的诱导剂相比,罗库溴铵的作用时间更长,因此可能会出现镇静不足的情况。在急诊科使用罗库溴铵进行麻痹时,曾观察到镇静延迟的情况,但在重症监护病房(ICU)中尚未发现。次要目标包括:(1) 镇静时间(分钟);(2) ICU 之间的镇静时间(分钟);(3) 提供者专科之间的镇静时间(分钟);(4) 格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)显示的镇静时间;(5) RSI 后第一小时与第二小时镇静强度评分(SIS)。纳入标准为年龄在 18 至 89 岁之间、使用罗库溴铵插管且在 ICU 插管。排除标准为插管前接触过镇静剂、无诱导剂记录或因麻痹而延迟记录、记录不完整、在 ICU 外插管、心脏骤停期间插管、怀孕或监禁。结果 共纳入了 192 例使用罗库溴铵的插管,其中 77 例(40.1%)在使用诱导剂后 15 分钟内接受了镇静。插管前 GCS ≤ 8 和 GCS > 8 患者接受镇静的比例没有差异(38.1% vs. 41.1%,P = 0.69)。结论 在这项单中心分析中,重症监护病房中使用罗库溴铵插管的大部分患者在诱导后 15 分钟内未接受额外镇静,使他们在瘫痪期间面临意识风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety of prolonged thrice-weekly high-dose daptomycin in a hemodialysis patient with prosthetic valve endocarditis Proportion of intensive care unit patients receiving sedation after rapid sequence intubation with rocuronium Effect of loperamide on heart rhythm: Randomized, double-blind, controlled study in healthy adults Advances in recognizing, treating, and preventing mpox infection Does phenobarbital reduce the hospital length of stay for patients suffering from severe alcohol withdrawal? A retrospective comparison of phenobarbital to lorazepam infusions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1