Service Sector Growth and 
Inequality in India: An Analysis of Household Consumption Spending

Chaitanya Talreja
{"title":"Service Sector Growth and \u2028Inequality in India: An Analysis of Household Consumption Spending","authors":"Chaitanya Talreja","doi":"10.1177/00194662241238498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two important aspects of service sector growth in India in the post-1991 reform period from the demand side have been identified in the literature. Ghose (2015) suggests that the rapid service demand expansion has been driven by the rich, who have disproportionately benefited from the information and communication technology (ICT)-based service boom. Basu and Das (2017) argue that service spending by the poorer section also rose, and the service demand expansion is partly a result of the coercive nature of privatised service expansion. This article examines these two critical aspects in greater detail using the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) consumer expenditure surveys from 1993–94, 2004–05 and 2011–12. The article finds clear evidence to show that the service expenditure in India was dominated by the top 20% of Indian households. Even as bottom 20% devoted larger household budget share to services over time, their share in aggregate service expenditure remained marginal. State per capita income, servicification of output, social expenditure by the government, urbanisation and changing nature of the economy post liberalisation are found to be important factors associated with variation in household service expenditure share across quintile classes. The relationships of these factors with service expenditure share differ across expenditure quintiles. Further, service expenditure elasticity estimates by decile classes indicate more than unit elasticity for various services over time, depicting non-saturating demand for services. The decile-wide rise in demand for services during this period, especially for the poorer households, is possibly due to a complex mechanism involving necessity, aspirations and enhanced access to new services and may not fit into the binary of discretion versus involuntary spending. JEL Codes: O1, L16, L80, D30, D12","PeriodicalId":509033,"journal":{"name":"The Indian Economic Journal","volume":"33 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662241238498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two important aspects of service sector growth in India in the post-1991 reform period from the demand side have been identified in the literature. Ghose (2015) suggests that the rapid service demand expansion has been driven by the rich, who have disproportionately benefited from the information and communication technology (ICT)-based service boom. Basu and Das (2017) argue that service spending by the poorer section also rose, and the service demand expansion is partly a result of the coercive nature of privatised service expansion. This article examines these two critical aspects in greater detail using the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) consumer expenditure surveys from 1993–94, 2004–05 and 2011–12. The article finds clear evidence to show that the service expenditure in India was dominated by the top 20% of Indian households. Even as bottom 20% devoted larger household budget share to services over time, their share in aggregate service expenditure remained marginal. State per capita income, servicification of output, social expenditure by the government, urbanisation and changing nature of the economy post liberalisation are found to be important factors associated with variation in household service expenditure share across quintile classes. The relationships of these factors with service expenditure share differ across expenditure quintiles. Further, service expenditure elasticity estimates by decile classes indicate more than unit elasticity for various services over time, depicting non-saturating demand for services. The decile-wide rise in demand for services during this period, especially for the poorer households, is possibly due to a complex mechanism involving necessity, aspirations and enhanced access to new services and may not fit into the binary of discretion versus involuntary spending. JEL Codes: O1, L16, L80, D30, D12
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度服务业的增长与不平等:家庭消费支出分析
文献从需求方面指出了 1991 年后改革时期印度服务业增长的两个重要方面。Ghose(2015)认为,服务需求的快速扩张是由富人推动的,他们从基于信息和通信技术(ICT)的服务繁荣中获益过多。Basu 和 Das(2017)认为,贫困阶层的服务支出也在上升,服务需求的扩张部分是私有化服务扩张的强制性质造成的。本文利用全国抽样调查组织(NSSO)1993-94 年、2004-05 年和 2011-12 年的消费者支出调查,更详细地研究了这两个关键方面。文章发现了明确的证据,表明印度的服务支出主要由印度家庭中收入最高的 20% 所支配。即使随着时间的推移,底层 20% 的家庭将更大的家庭预算份额用于服务业,他们在服务业总支出中所占的份额仍然微不足道。研究发现,邦人均收入、产出的服务化、政府的社会支出、城市化以及自由化后经济性质的变化是五等分层家庭服务支出份额变化的重要相关因素。这些因素与服务支出份额的关系在不同支出五分位数之间存在差异。此外,按十分位等级估算的服务支出弹性表明,随着时间的推移,各种服务的弹性都超过了单位弹性,说明对服务的需求并不饱和。在此期间,十等分家庭,特别是贫困家庭对服务需求的增加,可能是由于一个复杂的机制,涉及必要性、愿望和获得新服务的更多机会,可能并不符合自由支配与非自由支配的二元对立。JEL Codes:O1, L16, L80, D30, D12
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICT Diffusion, Trade Openness and Growth: Empirical Evidence from Asian Countries Making Global Pharma Supply Chain Resilient: Will the PLI Scheme of India make it a Reliable Alternative to China for the Supply of APIs? Technology Intensification and 
Farmers’ Welfare: A Case 
Study from Karnataka, 
a Semi-arid State of India International Remittances and Household Expenditure Patterns in Bangladesh Political Economy of Fertiliser Use in Agriculture: A Study of Two Districts of West Bengal*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1