Assessment of electrostatic discharge sensitivity of nitrogen-rich heterocyclic energetic compounds and their salts as high energy-density dangerous compounds: A study of structural variables
{"title":"Assessment of electrostatic discharge sensitivity of nitrogen-rich heterocyclic energetic compounds and their salts as high energy-density dangerous compounds: A study of structural variables","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dt.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nitrogen-rich heterocyclic energetic compounds (NRHECs) and their salts have witnessed widespread synthesis in recent years. The substantial energy-density content within these compounds can lead to potentially dangerous explosive reactions when subjected to external stimuli such as electrical discharge. Therefore, developing a reliable model for predicting their electrostatic discharge sensitivity (<em>ESD</em>) becomes imperative. This study proposes a novel and straightforward model based on the presence of specific groups (–NH<sub>2</sub> or -NH-, <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><msup><mi>N</mi><mo>+</mo></msup><mo>−</mo><msup><mi>O</mi><mo>−</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> and –NNO<sub>2</sub>, -ONO<sub>2</sub> or -NO<sub>2</sub>) under certain conditions to assess the <em>ESD</em> of NRHECs and their salts, employing interpretable structural parameters. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset comprising 54 <em>ESD</em> measurements of NRHECs and their salts, divided into 49/5 training/test sets, the model achieves promising results. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Maximum Error for the training set are reported as 0.16 J, 0.12 J, and 0.5 J, respectively. Notably, the ratios RMSE(training)/RMSE(test), MAE(training)/MAE(test), and Max Error(training)/Max Error(test) are all greater than 1.0, indicating the robust predictive capabilities of the model. The presented model demonstrates its efficacy in providing a reliable assessment of <em>ESD</em> for the targeted NRHECs and their salts, without the need for intricate computer codes or expert involvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":58209,"journal":{"name":"Defence Technology(防务技术)","volume":"39 ","pages":"Pages 15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914724000783/pdfft?md5=7d382bc8e3e228b608bebb09b9fe8d7a&pid=1-s2.0-S2214914724000783-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Technology(防务技术)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914724000783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nitrogen-rich heterocyclic energetic compounds (NRHECs) and their salts have witnessed widespread synthesis in recent years. The substantial energy-density content within these compounds can lead to potentially dangerous explosive reactions when subjected to external stimuli such as electrical discharge. Therefore, developing a reliable model for predicting their electrostatic discharge sensitivity (ESD) becomes imperative. This study proposes a novel and straightforward model based on the presence of specific groups (–NH2 or -NH-, and –NNO2, -ONO2 or -NO2) under certain conditions to assess the ESD of NRHECs and their salts, employing interpretable structural parameters. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset comprising 54 ESD measurements of NRHECs and their salts, divided into 49/5 training/test sets, the model achieves promising results. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Maximum Error for the training set are reported as 0.16 J, 0.12 J, and 0.5 J, respectively. Notably, the ratios RMSE(training)/RMSE(test), MAE(training)/MAE(test), and Max Error(training)/Max Error(test) are all greater than 1.0, indicating the robust predictive capabilities of the model. The presented model demonstrates its efficacy in providing a reliable assessment of ESD for the targeted NRHECs and their salts, without the need for intricate computer codes or expert involvement.
Defence Technology(防务技术)Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
728
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍:
Defence Technology, a peer reviewed journal, is published monthly and aims to become the best international academic exchange platform for the research related to defence technology. It publishes original research papers having direct bearing on defence, with a balanced coverage on analytical, experimental, numerical simulation and applied investigations. It covers various disciplines of science, technology and engineering.