Predicting Primary Care Physician Burnout From Electronic Health Record Use Measures

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Mayo Clinic proceedings Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.01.005
{"title":"Predicting Primary Care Physician Burnout From Electronic Health Record Use Measures","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the ability of routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) use measures to predict clinical work units at increased risk of burnout and potentially most in need of targeted interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this observational study of primary care physicians, we compiled clinical workload and EHR efficiency measures, then linked these measures to 2 years of well-being surveys (using the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index) conducted from April 1, 2019, through October 16, 2020. Physicians were grouped into training and confirmation data sets to develop predictive models for burnout. We used gradient boosting classifier and other prediction modeling algorithms to quantify the predictive performance by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 278 invited physicians from across 60 clinics, 233 (84%) completed 396 surveys. Physicians were 67% women with a median age category of 45 to 49 years. Aggregate burnout score was in the high range (≥3.325/10) on 111 of 396 (28%) surveys. Gradient boosting classifier of EHR use measures to predict burnout achieved an AUC of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.77) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.66). Other models’ confirmation set AUCs ranged from 0.56 (random forest) to 0.66 (penalized linear regression followed by dichotomization). Among the most predictive features were physician age, team member contributions to notes, and orders placed with user-defined preferences. Clinic-level aggregate measures identified the top quartile of clinics with 56% sensitivity and 85% specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a sample of primary care physicians, routinely collected EHR use measures demonstrated limited ability to predict individual burnout and moderate ability to identify high-risk clinics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18334,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","volume":"99 9","pages":"Pages 1411-1421"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619624000375/pdfft?md5=cf6dc8118af2c5a24e0ccf7daee24227&pid=1-s2.0-S0025619624000375-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619624000375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the ability of routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) use measures to predict clinical work units at increased risk of burnout and potentially most in need of targeted interventions.

Methods

In this observational study of primary care physicians, we compiled clinical workload and EHR efficiency measures, then linked these measures to 2 years of well-being surveys (using the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index) conducted from April 1, 2019, through October 16, 2020. Physicians were grouped into training and confirmation data sets to develop predictive models for burnout. We used gradient boosting classifier and other prediction modeling algorithms to quantify the predictive performance by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).

Results

Of 278 invited physicians from across 60 clinics, 233 (84%) completed 396 surveys. Physicians were 67% women with a median age category of 45 to 49 years. Aggregate burnout score was in the high range (≥3.325/10) on 111 of 396 (28%) surveys. Gradient boosting classifier of EHR use measures to predict burnout achieved an AUC of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.77) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.66). Other models’ confirmation set AUCs ranged from 0.56 (random forest) to 0.66 (penalized linear regression followed by dichotomization). Among the most predictive features were physician age, team member contributions to notes, and orders placed with user-defined preferences. Clinic-level aggregate measures identified the top quartile of clinics with 56% sensitivity and 85% specificity.

Conclusion

In a sample of primary care physicians, routinely collected EHR use measures demonstrated limited ability to predict individual burnout and moderate ability to identify high-risk clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从电子健康记录使用措施预测初级保健医生的职业倦怠。
方法在这项针对初级保健医生的观察性研究中,我们编制了临床工作量和电子病历效率测量方法,然后将这些测量方法与从 2019 年 4 月 1 日到 2020 年 10 月 16 日进行的两年幸福感调查(使用斯坦福职业满足指数)联系起来。医生被分为训练数据集和确认数据集,以开发职业倦怠预测模型。我们使用梯度提升分类器和其他预测建模算法,通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来量化预测性能。结果 在来自 60 家诊所的 278 名受邀医生中,有 233 人(84%)完成了 396 份调查。67%的医生为女性,年龄中位数为 45 至 49 岁。在 396 份调查问卷中,有 111 份(28%)的职业倦怠总分处于较高水平(≥3.325/10)。预测职业倦怠的电子病历使用措施梯度提升分类器的 AUC 为 0.59(95% CI,0.48 至 0.77),精确度-召回曲线下面积为 0.29(95% CI,0.20 至 0.66)。其他模型的确认集 AUC 从 0.56(随机森林)到 0.66(惩罚线性回归,然后二分法)不等。最具预测性的特征包括医生年龄、团队成员对笔记的贡献以及根据用户自定义偏好下达的订单。结论 在初级保健医生样本中,常规收集的电子病历使用情况表明,预测个人职业倦怠的能力有限,识别高风险诊所的能力一般。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings
Mayo Clinic proceedings 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Mayo Clinic Proceedings is a premier peer-reviewed clinical journal in general medicine. Sponsored by Mayo Clinic, it is one of the most widely read and highly cited scientific publications for physicians. Since 1926, Mayo Clinic Proceedings has continuously published articles that focus on clinical medicine and support the professional and educational needs of its readers. The journal welcomes submissions from authors worldwide and includes Nobel-prize-winning research in its content. With an Impact Factor of 8.9, Mayo Clinic Proceedings is ranked #20 out of 167 journals in the Medicine, General and Internal category, placing it in the top 12% of these journals. It invites manuscripts on clinical and laboratory medicine, health care policy and economics, medical education and ethics, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Associated Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Septal Reduction Therapies in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Agreement of Doppler Flow Velocity Reserve With PET Flow Reserve in Patients With Angina Without Obstructive Coronary Arteries. Women Consume Less Oxygen Than Men for Muscular Work: Role of Lean Body Mass. Cutaneous Clear Cell Hidradenoma. Post-Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome-A Diagnostic Dilemma and Challenging Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1