Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model

IF 8.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.2147/sar.s460024
Tyler S. Oesterle, Nicholas L. Bormann, Domenic Ochal, Stephan Arndt, Scott Breitinger
{"title":"Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model","authors":"Tyler S. Oesterle, Nicholas L. Bormann, Domenic Ochal, Stephan Arndt, Scott Breitinger","doi":"10.2147/sar.s460024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181–255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020–2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18–40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50–2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":"554 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/sar.s460024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181–255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020–2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18–40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50–2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将针对药物使用障碍患者的纯虚拟小组疗法过渡到混合模式
目的:远程医疗有很多好处,但人们对参加者在现场和虚拟环境(混合模式)下参加小组治疗的药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗效果知之甚少。我们试图确定治疗完成率是否有所不同。患者和方法:COVID-19 大流行引起的政策变化在明尼苏达州农村地区的七个强化门诊(IOP)项目中开展了一项自然观察队列研究。纯虚拟组于 2020 年 1 月 6 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日进行,混合组于 2021 年 1 月 7 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日进行。我们对研究期间开始和结束治疗的参与者的数据进行了回顾性评估。研究对象是在 26 个月期间接受治疗和退出治疗的 18 岁及以上、被诊断患有药物滥用症的 IOP 小组成员。共有 1502 名参与者(每个地点 181-255 人)的连续样本,其中 644 人被剔除:其中 576 人在研究结束后出院,49 人缺失注册或出院数据,14 人在治疗过程中转院,5 人在研究开始前开始治疗。赫尔默特对比评估了混合组暴露的影响。研究结果共纳入 858 人。数据并非来自病历,且已去除特定人口统计学特征;然而,2020-2022 年的总体 IOP 样本(样本来源)中,29.8% 为女性,64.1% 为 18-40 岁。就已完成的治疗而言,混合组相对于纯虚拟组的单变量几率比为 1.88(95% CI:1.50-2.41,p <0.001)。不同眼压观测点之间没有明显差异。结论这些结果描述了一种新颖的混合小组虚拟治疗 SUD 的方法,其结果数据在以前的文献中没有记载。虽然虚拟治疗可以增加获得治疗的机会,但这些结果表明,包括面对面治疗在内的选择也会带来益处。还需要进一步的研究,以确定面对面治疗如何改变动态,以及是否可以在纯虚拟模式中复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
期刊最新文献
First-Principles Design Rules for Selective Room-Temperature Gas Sensing in Transition-Metal-Doped MoS2 Atomic Layer Deposition of Pd: Schottky Junction Construction on CoP-Co2P for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Covalently Anchored MXene-Infiltrated Porous Silicon for Mechanically Resilient Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes Exceptional Stability of a 3D Cationic Covalent Organic Polymer for ReO4–/99TcO4– Remediation in Acidic and High-Radiation Nuclear Wastewater An Injectable Thermosensitive Hydrogel Codelivering Permeability-Promoting Nintedanib-loaded Phase-transition Nanoparticles and Doxorubicin to Potentiate Immunogenic Cell Death in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer for Chemoimmunotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1