Comparative impact of active participation and observation in simulation-based emergency care education on knowledge, learning effectiveness, and satisfaction among undergraduate nursing students

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.003
Jiin-Ling Jiang RN, PhD , Shu-Ying Fu RN, MSc , Yu-Chin Ma RN, PhD , Jen-Hung Wang PhD , Malcolm Koo PhD
{"title":"Comparative impact of active participation and observation in simulation-based emergency care education on knowledge, learning effectiveness, and satisfaction among undergraduate nursing students","authors":"Jiin-Ling Jiang RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Shu-Ying Fu RN, MSc ,&nbsp;Yu-Chin Ma RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Jen-Hung Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Malcolm Koo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Due to limitations in space, time, and equipment availability, nursing students often have to alternate between active participation and observation in simulation-based education (SBE) scenarios, a practice whose effect on learning outcomes is not well-documented.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to integrate SBE into a third-year emergency nursing course, focusing on the impact of different roles (active participation vs. observation) on students' emergency care knowledge, learning effectiveness, and post-simulation satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this prospective, mixed-methods study, students were divided into performer (<em>n</em>=67) and observer (<em>n</em>=67) roles for simulation exercises using high-fidelity manikins and standardized patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings revealed a significant improvement in emergency care knowledge between pre-test and post-test scores (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001) in both the performer and observer groups. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups post-test (<em>p</em>=0.550). Moreover, the learning effectiveness (<em>p</em>=0.847) and satisfaction (<em>p</em>=0.513) were not significantly different between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results demonstrated that SBE was an effective method for improving students’ emergency care knowledge, with both active participants and observers benefiting similarly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to limitations in space, time, and equipment availability, nursing students often have to alternate between active participation and observation in simulation-based education (SBE) scenarios, a practice whose effect on learning outcomes is not well-documented.

Aim

This study aimed to integrate SBE into a third-year emergency nursing course, focusing on the impact of different roles (active participation vs. observation) on students' emergency care knowledge, learning effectiveness, and post-simulation satisfaction.

Methods

In this prospective, mixed-methods study, students were divided into performer (n=67) and observer (n=67) roles for simulation exercises using high-fidelity manikins and standardized patients.

Results

The findings revealed a significant improvement in emergency care knowledge between pre-test and post-test scores (p<0.001) in both the performer and observer groups. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups post-test (p=0.550). Moreover, the learning effectiveness (p=0.847) and satisfaction (p=0.513) were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

The results demonstrated that SBE was an effective method for improving students’ emergency care knowledge, with both active participants and observers benefiting similarly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在模拟急救护理教育中积极参与和观察对护理本科生的知识、学习效果和满意度的比较影响
背景由于受到空间、时间和设备可用性的限制,护理专业学生在模拟教学(SBE)场景中往往不得不在积极参与和观察之间交替进行,这种做法对学习效果的影响尚未得到充分证明。方法在这项前瞻性的混合方法研究中,学生们被分为表演者(n=67)和观察者(n=67)两组,使用高仿真人体模型和标准化病人进行模拟练习。结果研究结果显示,表演者组和观察者组的急诊护理知识在测试前和测试后的得分之间都有显著提高(p<0.001)。然而,测试后两组之间无明显差异(p=0.550)。此外,两组学生的学习效果(p=0.847)和满意度(p=0.513)也无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1