Commercial spaceflight: Regulatory framework assessment and safety perspectives

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Space Safety Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsse.2024.04.004
G. Buzzo, L. Travascio, A. Vozella
{"title":"Commercial spaceflight: Regulatory framework assessment and safety perspectives","authors":"G. Buzzo,&nbsp;L. Travascio,&nbsp;A. Vozella","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent years are witnessing the rapid technological development in airspace domain, actually paving the way to the development of a commercial space market. Until the recent past, space operations have been essentially performed by research centers or military agencies, in usually segregated areas to ensure third parties’ safety, governed by launch base regulations and organized in an unscheduled manner. However, with the entry of private companies into the space domain, a new market niche is being created: that of commercial space transportation. For example, a promising area is the one related to operations performed by commercial suborbital flights, whether aimed at space tourism or simply transporting things and/or passengers from one point to another on the Earth's surface. The traffic volumes are supposed to increase in next years and segregating airspace does not represent a sustainable solution for the future.</p><p>The present paper will first assess the state of the art of the regulatory framework currently applicable to operators in order to obtain authorization to perform space missions for commercial use, then propose a comparison between the United State of America and European regulatory frameworks. Main challenges related to regulatory aspects will be identified and perspectives on possible higher airspace operations integration in the medium-long term will be derived. Finally, safety considerations deriving from a seamless accommodation of higher airspace operations in current Air Traffic Management will be derived for the medium-long term. In conclusion, this work reveals that neither the United States nor Europe has formally approved a legal framework establishing certification procedures for sub-orbital space transport systems. Currently, the US legislation is the most applicable as it has comprehensive rules to allow operators to obtain flight authorization ensuring compliance with requirements through a compliance matrix periodically updated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896724000508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years are witnessing the rapid technological development in airspace domain, actually paving the way to the development of a commercial space market. Until the recent past, space operations have been essentially performed by research centers or military agencies, in usually segregated areas to ensure third parties’ safety, governed by launch base regulations and organized in an unscheduled manner. However, with the entry of private companies into the space domain, a new market niche is being created: that of commercial space transportation. For example, a promising area is the one related to operations performed by commercial suborbital flights, whether aimed at space tourism or simply transporting things and/or passengers from one point to another on the Earth's surface. The traffic volumes are supposed to increase in next years and segregating airspace does not represent a sustainable solution for the future.

The present paper will first assess the state of the art of the regulatory framework currently applicable to operators in order to obtain authorization to perform space missions for commercial use, then propose a comparison between the United State of America and European regulatory frameworks. Main challenges related to regulatory aspects will be identified and perspectives on possible higher airspace operations integration in the medium-long term will be derived. Finally, safety considerations deriving from a seamless accommodation of higher airspace operations in current Air Traffic Management will be derived for the medium-long term. In conclusion, this work reveals that neither the United States nor Europe has formally approved a legal framework establishing certification procedures for sub-orbital space transport systems. Currently, the US legislation is the most applicable as it has comprehensive rules to allow operators to obtain flight authorization ensuring compliance with requirements through a compliance matrix periodically updated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业航天:监管框架评估和安全视角
近年来,空域领域的技术发展迅速,这实际上为商业空间市场的发展铺平了道路。直到最近,空间业务基本上都是由研究中心或军事机构进行的,通常是在隔离区内进行,以确保第三方的安全,受发射基地条例的制约,以非计划的方式组织。然而,随着私营公司进入太空领域,一个新的市场利基正在形成:商业太空运输。例如,一个很有前景的领域是商业亚轨道飞行的相关业务,无论是以太空旅游为目的,还是仅仅是将物品和/或乘客从地球表面的一个点运送到另一个点。本文件将首先评估目前适用于运营商的监管框架的最新情况,以便获得执行商业用途空间飞行任务的授权,然后对美国和欧洲的监管框架进行比较。将确定与监管方面有关的主要挑战,并对中长期内可能的更高空域运行一体化进行展望。最后,还将从中长期角度提出将高级空域运行无缝纳入当前空中交通管理的安全考虑因素。总之,这项工作表明,美国和欧洲都没有正式批准建立亚轨道空间运输系统认证程序的法律框架。目前,美国的立法最适用,因为它有全面的规则,允许运营商获得飞行授权,确保通过定期更新的合规矩阵符合要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Safety Engineering
Journal of Space Safety Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Efforts in ensuring safety and transparency in space activities in the Asia-Pacific A tale of three failure-oriented-accelerated-test (FOAT) types and their roles in assuring aerospace electronics-and-photonics reliability: Perspective Functional status of the human cardiorespiratory system during a one-year expedition at Vostok station in central Antarctica as a model of a long-term lunar base Safety analysis of evaluation and acceptance processes for space systems and operations based on system-theoretic approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1