Bursal Tissue Harvested During Rotator Cuff Repair Contains Viable Mesenchymal Stem Cells

{"title":"Bursal Tissue Harvested During Rotator Cuff Repair Contains Viable Mesenchymal Stem Cells","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of intraoperative ablation on the viability, distribution, phenotype, and potential for culture expansion of bursal cells harvested during arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Tissue was collected during primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on 6 healthy, randomly selected patients from a fellowship-trained surgeon’s practice between September 2020 and January 2021. There were 3 women (aged 60 ± 8 years) and 3 men (aged 61 ± 10 years). At the time of surgery, subacromial bursal tissue was subjected to no ablation, 1 second of ablation, or 3 seconds of ablation. Tissues were collected by an autograft harvesting system connected to an arthroscopic shaver and a pituitary grasper. Tissue fragments from each condition were sampled for viability testing or cell isolation. A viability kit with confocal microscopy was used to assess live and dead cells. Cell isolation consisted of collagenase digestion or placing tissue fragments onto tissue culture–treated plates that induced migration of cells out of the tissue. Cell proliferation rates were monitored and surface markers for mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and pericytes were analyzed via multicolor flow cytometry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Increased ablation time significantly reduced cell viability. The mean percentage of live cells was 55.2% ± 27.2% (range, 26%-90% live) in the control group, 46.8% ± 23.8% (range, 9.6%-69.6%, <em>P</em> = .045) in the short-ablation group, and 35.5% ± 19% (range, 11%-54%, <em>P</em> = .03) in the long-ablation group. No significant differences in population doubling level (1.6 ± 0.5 days) and population doubling time (6.7 ± 2.4 days) were observed in cells from any treatment. The surface marker profile indicated an MSC phenotype with absence of a pericyte population. Ablation or cell isolation procedure had no significant effect on the surface marker profile of isolated cells.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Radiofrequency ablation significantly reduced the overall tissue viability but had no significant effect on cell proliferation or expression of surface markers on isolated subacromial bursal cells harvested arthroscopically.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Analysis of the viability and performance of cells harvested after the use of ablation devices using mechanical surgical collection during rotator cuff repair surgery could further our understanding of subacromial bursal tissue and its potential role in augmenting rotator cuff repair healing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000658/pdfft?md5=9d38deec67884cde2974b732a2d29a15&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000658-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative ablation on the viability, distribution, phenotype, and potential for culture expansion of bursal cells harvested during arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery.

Methods

Tissue was collected during primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on 6 healthy, randomly selected patients from a fellowship-trained surgeon’s practice between September 2020 and January 2021. There were 3 women (aged 60 ± 8 years) and 3 men (aged 61 ± 10 years). At the time of surgery, subacromial bursal tissue was subjected to no ablation, 1 second of ablation, or 3 seconds of ablation. Tissues were collected by an autograft harvesting system connected to an arthroscopic shaver and a pituitary grasper. Tissue fragments from each condition were sampled for viability testing or cell isolation. A viability kit with confocal microscopy was used to assess live and dead cells. Cell isolation consisted of collagenase digestion or placing tissue fragments onto tissue culture–treated plates that induced migration of cells out of the tissue. Cell proliferation rates were monitored and surface markers for mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and pericytes were analyzed via multicolor flow cytometry.

Results

Increased ablation time significantly reduced cell viability. The mean percentage of live cells was 55.2% ± 27.2% (range, 26%-90% live) in the control group, 46.8% ± 23.8% (range, 9.6%-69.6%, P = .045) in the short-ablation group, and 35.5% ± 19% (range, 11%-54%, P = .03) in the long-ablation group. No significant differences in population doubling level (1.6 ± 0.5 days) and population doubling time (6.7 ± 2.4 days) were observed in cells from any treatment. The surface marker profile indicated an MSC phenotype with absence of a pericyte population. Ablation or cell isolation procedure had no significant effect on the surface marker profile of isolated cells.

Conclusions

Radiofrequency ablation significantly reduced the overall tissue viability but had no significant effect on cell proliferation or expression of surface markers on isolated subacromial bursal cells harvested arthroscopically.

Clinical Relevance

Analysis of the viability and performance of cells harvested after the use of ablation devices using mechanical surgical collection during rotator cuff repair surgery could further our understanding of subacromial bursal tissue and its potential role in augmenting rotator cuff repair healing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肩袖修复过程中采集的滑囊组织含有可存活的间充质干细胞
目的 评估术中消融对关节镜下肩袖手术中采集的滑囊细胞的存活率、分布、表型和培养扩增潜力的影响。方法 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,从一名经过研究员培训的外科医生处随机挑选了 6 名健康患者,在关节镜下对他们进行肩袖初级修复时采集了组织。其中有 3 名女性(年龄为 60 ± 8 岁)和 3 名男性(年龄为 61 ± 10 岁)。手术时,肩峰下滑囊组织分别接受无消融、1 秒消融或 3 秒消融。组织由连接关节镜刨削器和垂体抓取器的自体移植物采集系统采集。对每种情况下的组织碎片进行取样,以进行存活率测试或细胞分离。使用带有共聚焦显微镜的活力试剂盒来评估活细胞和死细胞。细胞分离包括胶原酶消化或将组织片段放在组织培养处理板上,诱导细胞从组织中迁移出来。通过多色流式细胞术监测细胞增殖率并分析间充质干细胞(MSC)和周细胞的表面标记。对照组活细胞的平均百分比为 55.2% ± 27.2%(范围:26%-90% 活细胞),短时间消融组为 46.8% ± 23.8%(范围:9.6%-69.6%,P = 0.045),长时间消融组为 35.5% ± 19%(范围:11%-54%,P = 0.03)。任何处理的细胞在种群倍增水平(1.6 ± 0.5 天)和种群倍增时间(6.7 ± 2.4 天)方面均无明显差异。表面标记轮廓显示间充质干细胞表型中没有周细胞群。结论射频消融可显著降低组织的整体存活率,但对关节镜下采集的分离的肩峰下滑囊细胞的细胞增殖或表面标志物的表达没有明显影响。临床意义分析肩袖修复手术中使用机械手术采集消融装置后收获的细胞的存活率和性能,可以进一步了解肩峰下滑囊组织及其在增强肩袖修复愈合中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Continuous Meniscal Repair Technique Allows for Shorter Operative Time and Learning Curve Compared With Traditional Vertical Mattress Technique in Controlled Arthroscopic Training in Porcine Model Concomitant Popliteomeniscal Fascicles Tears Are Found in 21% of Professional Soccer Players With Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Mini-Open Technique for Gluteus Medius Tendon Repairs Is Associated With Low Complication Rates and Sustained Improvement in Patient Reported Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up The Top-20 Studies About Anterior Shoulder Instability From an Altmetric Analysis Had Higher Levels of Evidence Than Those From a Traditional Bibliometric Analysis Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Augmented With a Reinforced Bioinductive Implant Is Biomechanically Similar to the Native Medial Patellofemoral Ligament at Time Zero in a Cadaveric Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1