首页 > 最新文献

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
Postoperative Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle Is Not Correlated with Patient-Reported Outcomes or Range of Motion 术后反向肩关节置换术角度与患者报告的结果或活动范围无关
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101250
Noah E. DiNapoli B.S. , Nichole M. Perry M.D. , James A. Rhead B.S. , Edward C. Beck M.D. , Nicholas A. Trasolini M.D. , Benjamin R. Graves M.D. , Brian R. Waterman M.D. , Alan W. Reynolds M.D.

Purpose

To determine whether postoperative reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) angle as a continuous variable is correlated with postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or range of motion (ROM) for patients undergoing RSA with modern implants.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to measure preoperative and postoperative RSA angle using radiographs for patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing primary RSA at a single academic center between 2015 and 2022. PROMs including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), visual analog scale (VAS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected. External rotation, internal rotation, and forward flexion ROM measurements were also recorded. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses were performed to determine whether there were any linear or monotonic relationships between postoperative RSA angle and the other variables.

Results

A total of 142 patients were included with an average follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.3 years. The average RSA angle was 19.3° ± 9.1° preoperatively and 4.3° ± 7.1° postoperatively. No significant relationship between postoperative RSA angle and PROMs was found: ASES (r = –0.01, P = .87), VAS (r = 0.01, P = .85), and SANE (r = 0.04, P = .67). Patients showed varying degrees of improvement in PROMs, as indicated by rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference: ASES: 77.3%; VAS: 92.0%; SANE: 66.7%. Final ROM also showed no statistically significant association with postoperative RSA angle: external rotation (r = 0.05, P = .59), internal rotation (r = 0.03, P = .74), and forward flexion (r = –0.08, P = .59). Patients with a higher postoperative RSA angle had a higher preoperative RSA angle (P < .001).

Conclusions

Postoperative RSA angle was not correlated with differences in postoperative PROMs, including ASES, VAS, and SANE, or with differences in postoperative ROM. Inclination of postoperative RSA angle, particularly without significant outliers, may not be detrimental to patient outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.
目的探讨肩关节置换术(RSA)术后角度作为一个连续变量是否与术后患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)或植入现代假体的肩关节置换术患者的活动范围(ROM)相关。方法回顾性分析2015年至2022年在单一学术中心接受初级RSA至少2年随访的患者术前和术后使用x线片测量RSA角度。PROMs包括美国肩肘外科医生(ase)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和单一评估数字评估(SANE)评分。同时记录外旋、内旋和前屈ROM测量。进行Pearson和Spearman相关分析,以确定术后RSA角与其他变量之间是否存在线性或单调关系。结果共纳入142例患者,平均随访时间3.3±1.3年。RSA平均角度术前为19.3°±9.1°,术后为4.3°±7.1°。术后RSA角度与PROMs无显著相关性:as (r = -0.01, P = 0.87)、VAS (r = 0.01, P = 0.85)、SANE (r = 0.04, P = 0.67)。患者在PROMs方面表现出不同程度的改善,如达到最小临床重要差异的比率:as: 77.3%;血管:92.0%;理智:66.7%。最终ROM与术后RSA角度的相关性也无统计学意义:外旋(r = 0.05, P = 0.59)、内旋(r = 0.03, P = 0.74)和前屈(r = -0.08, P = 0.59)。术后RSA角度较高的患者术前RSA角度也较高(P < .001)。结论术后RSA角度与术后PROMs(包括asas、VAS和SANE)的差异及术后ROM的差异无关。术后RSA角度的倾斜,特别是无显著异常值的情况下,可能不会影响患者的预后。证据水平:IV级,回顾性治疗病例系列。
{"title":"Postoperative Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle Is Not Correlated with Patient-Reported Outcomes or Range of Motion","authors":"Noah E. DiNapoli B.S. ,&nbsp;Nichole M. Perry M.D. ,&nbsp;James A. Rhead B.S. ,&nbsp;Edward C. Beck M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Trasolini M.D. ,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Graves M.D. ,&nbsp;Brian R. Waterman M.D. ,&nbsp;Alan W. Reynolds M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101250","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101250","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine whether postoperative reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) angle as a continuous variable is correlated with postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or range of motion (ROM) for patients undergoing RSA with modern implants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was performed to measure preoperative and postoperative RSA angle using radiographs for patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing primary RSA at a single academic center between 2015 and 2022. PROMs including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), visual analog scale (VAS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected. External rotation, internal rotation, and forward flexion ROM measurements were also recorded. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses were performed to determine whether there were any linear or monotonic relationships between postoperative RSA angle and the other variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 142 patients were included with an average follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.3 years. The average RSA angle was 19.3° ± 9.1° preoperatively and 4.3° ± 7.1° postoperatively. No significant relationship between postoperative RSA angle and PROMs was found: ASES (<em>r</em> = –0.01, <em>P</em> = .87), VAS (<em>r</em> = 0.01, <em>P</em> = .85), and SANE (<em>r</em> = 0.04, <em>P</em> = .67). Patients showed varying degrees of improvement in PROMs, as indicated by rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference: ASES: 77.3%; VAS: 92.0%; SANE: 66.7%. Final ROM also showed no statistically significant association with postoperative RSA angle: external rotation (<em>r</em> = 0.05, <em>P</em> = .59), internal rotation (<em>r</em> = 0.03, <em>P</em> = .74), and forward flexion (<em>r</em> = –0.08, <em>P</em> = .59). Patients with a higher postoperative RSA angle had a higher preoperative RSA angle (<em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Postoperative RSA angle was not correlated with differences in postoperative PROMs, including ASES, VAS, and SANE, or with differences in postoperative ROM. Inclination of postoperative RSA angle, particularly without significant outliers, may not be detrimental to patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long Head Biceps Tendon Angle Shows the Highest Sensitivity and Long Head Biceps Tendon-Groove Distance the Highest Specificity for the Diagnosis of Biceps Pulley Lesions Using Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 长头二头肌肌腱角度对常规磁共振诊断二头肌皮带轮病变的敏感性最高,长头二头肌肌腱沟距离对常规磁共振诊断二头肌皮带轮病变的特异性最高
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101253
Javier Ardebol M.D., M.B.A. , Roger Erosa-Villarreal M.D. , Edwin Valencia-Ramón M.D. , Alejandro López-Villers M.D. , Guillermo Franco-del Río M.D. , Patrick J. Denard M.D. , Frank Martetschläger M.D. , Juan Cosme-Labarthe M.D. , Alexandre Lädermann M.D. , Juan Pablo Muñoz M.D. , Alberto Guevara-Alvarez M.D.

Purpose

To determine the diagnostic performance and inter-rater agreement for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs of long head biceps tendon (LHBT) instability and overall, using conventional MRI for the diagnosis of biceps pulley lesions.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, conventional MRIs were reviewed by 5 assessors for the presence or absence of biceps pulley lesions and 6 specific MRI signs. Diagnostic performance of pulley lesion and sign detection using MRI was tested using arthroscopy as the reference standard. Interobserver agreement was measured with Kappa statistics and diagnostic performance with sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values overall and for radiologists and surgeons.

Results

A total of 60 MRIs, 30 with biceps pully lesions and 30 without, were included. Overall, diagnostic performance metrics for MRI included a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 80%. Interobserver reliability analysis revealed moderate agreement overall, with a global kappa value of 0.59. LHBT angle showed the highest sensitivity (84%) and LHBT-groove distance showed the greatest specificity (98%). Both radiologists and surgeons reported similar diagnostic accuracy through MRI.

Conclusions

Overall, conventional MRI had an acceptable diagnostic performance, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of approximately 80%. Among the evaluated signs, the LHBT angle had the highest sensitivity, whereas the LHBT-groove distance showed the greatest specificity. Interobserver reliability was moderate overall, though some observer pairs achieved substantial agreement. However, there was variability across diagnostic signs.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.
目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)对长头二头肌肌腱(LHBT)不稳定征象的诊断效能和评分一致性,以及常规MRI对二头肌滑轮病变的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析5名评估者对二头肌皮带轮病变的存在或不存在以及6个特定的MRI征象进行评估。以关节镜为参考标准,对MRI对皮带轮病变的诊断性能和体征检测进行测试。通过Kappa统计和诊断表现(总体上、放射科医生和外科医生的敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值)来衡量观察者间的一致性。结果共纳入60张mri,其中30张有二头肌滑脱病变,30张无。总体而言,MRI的诊断性能指标包括81%的敏感性,79%的特异性,80%的阳性预测值和80%的阴性预测值。观察者间信度分析显示,总体上的一致性中等,kappa值为0.59。LHBT角度敏感性最高(84%),LHBT沟距特异性最高(98%)。放射科医生和外科医生都报告了通过核磁共振成像的诊断准确性。结论总体而言,常规MRI具有可接受的诊断性能,其敏感性、特异性和预测值约为80%。在评价指标中,LHBT角度的敏感性最高,而LHBT沟距的特异性最大。观察者之间的可靠性总体上是中等的,尽管一些观察者对取得了实质性的一致。然而,不同的诊断体征存在差异。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
{"title":"Long Head Biceps Tendon Angle Shows the Highest Sensitivity and Long Head Biceps Tendon-Groove Distance the Highest Specificity for the Diagnosis of Biceps Pulley Lesions Using Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging","authors":"Javier Ardebol M.D., M.B.A. ,&nbsp;Roger Erosa-Villarreal M.D. ,&nbsp;Edwin Valencia-Ramón M.D. ,&nbsp;Alejandro López-Villers M.D. ,&nbsp;Guillermo Franco-del Río M.D. ,&nbsp;Patrick J. Denard M.D. ,&nbsp;Frank Martetschläger M.D. ,&nbsp;Juan Cosme-Labarthe M.D. ,&nbsp;Alexandre Lädermann M.D. ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Muñoz M.D. ,&nbsp;Alberto Guevara-Alvarez M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine the diagnostic performance and inter-rater agreement for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs of long head biceps tendon (LHBT) instability and overall, using conventional MRI for the diagnosis of biceps pulley lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective analysis, conventional MRIs were reviewed by 5 assessors for the presence or absence of biceps pulley lesions and 6 specific MRI signs. Diagnostic performance of pulley lesion and sign detection using MRI was tested using arthroscopy as the reference standard. Interobserver agreement was measured with Kappa statistics and diagnostic performance with sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values overall and for radiologists and surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 60 MRIs, 30 with biceps pully lesions and 30 without, were included. Overall, diagnostic performance metrics for MRI included a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 80%. Interobserver reliability analysis revealed moderate agreement overall, with a global kappa value of 0.59. LHBT angle showed the highest sensitivity (84%) and LHBT-groove distance showed the greatest specificity (98%). Both radiologists and surgeons reported similar diagnostic accuracy through MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, conventional MRI had an acceptable diagnostic performance, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of approximately 80%. Among the evaluated signs, the LHBT angle had the highest sensitivity, whereas the LHBT-groove distance showed the greatest specificity. Interobserver reliability was moderate overall, though some observer pairs achieved substantial agreement. However, there was variability across diagnostic signs.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High Patient Satisfaction With Gluteus Maximus Transfer for Abductor Insufficiency Despite Persistent Trendelenburg Gait 臀大肌转移治疗外展肌功能不全患者满意度高
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101224
Katherine L. Esser B.S., Michelle Shen M.D., Larry Chen B.S., Griffith G. Gosnell M.S., Emily Berzolla B.S., Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas M.D., Robert Meislin M.D., Thomas Youm M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate short-term clinical and patient reported outcomes after gluteus maximus/tensor fascia lata (GM/TFL) transfer for abductor insufficiency.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent GM/TFL for chronic abductor insufficiency from 2017 to 2024 at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and at least 1 recorded postoperative visit. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected, including hip range of motion, abduction strength, presence of Trendelenburg gait, postoperative rehabilitation details, complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical comparisons of pre- and postoperative objective measures were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

Ten patients (8 female, 2 male) with a mean age of 65.8 ± 11.2 years were included. Mean follow-up was 2.3 years (0.7-7.8). Postoperatively, range of motion and abduction strength showed no significant changes (P > .05), and Trendelenburg gait persisted in 80% of patients. However, patient-reported outcome scores were strong, with a mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score of 76.5 ± 22.4 and Non-Arthritic Hip Score of 74.1 ± 21.7. Patient satisfaction was high, with 100% of patients indicating they would undergo the procedure again. Three patients experienced complications (30%), including 2 patients who had persistent pain and seroma formation, and a patient who had a recurrent hematoma.

Conclusions

GM/TFL transfer does not consistently improve hip strength or gait mechanics; however, it provides pain relief and improved quality of life, as evidenced by high patient satisfaction and favorable modified Harris Hip Score outcomes. Three patients experienced complications (30%), including two patients who had persistent pain and seroma formation, and a patient who had a recurrent hematoma.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.
目的评价臀大肌/阔筋膜张肌(GM/TFL)转移治疗外展肌功能不全的短期临床和患者报告的结果。方法回顾性分析。纳入标准是2017年至2024年在单一机构接受GM/TFL治疗慢性外展肌功能不全的患者,随访时间至少为6个月,术后至少有1次随访记录。收集了人口统计学、临床和结果数据,包括髋关节活动范围、外展力量、Trendelenburg步态的存在、术后康复细节、并发症和患者报告的结果。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验对术前和术后客观测量进行统计学比较。结果10例患者(女8例,男2例),平均年龄65.8±11.2岁。平均随访时间2.3年(0.7 ~ 7.8年)。术后患者的活动范围和外展力量无明显变化(P > 0.05), 80%的患者保持Trendelenburg步态。然而,患者报告的结果评分很高,术后改良Harris髋关节评分平均为76.5±22.4,非关节炎髋关节评分为74.1±21.7。患者满意度很高,100%的患者表示他们会再次接受手术。3例患者出现并发症(30%),包括2例持续性疼痛和血肿形成患者,1例复发性血肿患者。结论gm /TFL移植不能持续改善髋关节力量或步态力学;然而,它提供了疼痛缓解和改善生活质量,证明了高患者满意度和良好的修改哈里斯髋关节评分结果。3例患者出现并发症(30%),包括2例持续性疼痛和血肿形成患者,1例复发性血肿患者。证据水平:IV级,回顾性治疗病例系列。
{"title":"High Patient Satisfaction With Gluteus Maximus Transfer for Abductor Insufficiency Despite Persistent Trendelenburg Gait","authors":"Katherine L. Esser B.S.,&nbsp;Michelle Shen M.D.,&nbsp;Larry Chen B.S.,&nbsp;Griffith G. Gosnell M.S.,&nbsp;Emily Berzolla B.S.,&nbsp;Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas M.D.,&nbsp;Robert Meislin M.D.,&nbsp;Thomas Youm M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101224","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101224","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate short-term clinical and patient reported outcomes after gluteus maximus/tensor fascia lata (GM/TFL) transfer for abductor insufficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective case series. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent GM/TFL for chronic abductor insufficiency from 2017 to 2024 at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and at least 1 recorded postoperative visit. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected, including hip range of motion, abduction strength, presence of Trendelenburg gait, postoperative rehabilitation details, complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical comparisons of pre- and postoperative objective measures were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten patients (8 female, 2 male) with a mean age of 65.8 ± 11.2 years were included. Mean follow-up was 2.3 years (0.7-7.8). Postoperatively, range of motion and abduction strength showed no significant changes (<em>P</em> &gt; .05), and Trendelenburg gait persisted in 80% of patients. However, patient-reported outcome scores were strong, with a mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score of 76.5 ± 22.4 and Non-Arthritic Hip Score of 74.1 ± 21.7. Patient satisfaction was high, with 100% of patients indicating they would undergo the procedure again. Three patients experienced complications (30%), including 2 patients who had persistent pain and seroma formation, and a patient who had a recurrent hematoma.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>GM/TFL transfer does not consistently improve hip strength or gait mechanics; however, it provides pain relief and improved quality of life, as evidenced by high patient satisfaction and favorable modified Harris Hip Score outcomes. Three patients experienced complications (30%), including two patients who had persistent pain and seroma formation, and a patient who had a recurrent hematoma.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
General Anesthesia Using Laryngeal Mask Airway Ventilation With Low-Dose Neuromuscular Blockade Is Safe and Effective for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy 全麻喉罩通气配合低剂量神经肌肉阻滞对髋关节镜手术患者安全有效
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101218
Justin T. Jabara M.D. , Jillian H. Neuner B.A. , Akash Vasanthan M.S. , Pedram Aleshi M.D. , Sakura Kinjo M.D. , Stephanie E. Wong M.D. , Alan L. Zhang M.D.

Purpose

To investigate safety and efficacy of a general anesthesia protocol using laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ventilation without endotracheal intubation (ETT) in the setting of a low dosage of neuromuscular blockade (NMBA) for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Methods

Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome at a single institution from 2014 to 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Those who underwent hip arthroscopy for non-femoroacetabular impingement syndrome indications and those with a concomitant periacetabular osteotomy were excluded. General anesthesia was administered with propofol and sevoflurane, with LMA ventilation. A low-dose (10-50 mg) NMBA agent (rocuronium) was given before hip distraction. The primary outcome of interest was pulmonary aspiration. Secondary outcomes of interest included conversion to ETT and operating room time.

Results

This study included 1,169 cases (49.8% female) with mean age 37.8 years (± 11.0) and body mass index 24.4 (± 3.9). In total, 64.0% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I, 34.8% class II, and 1.2% class III. In 24 cases, patients underwent ETT without attempting LMA as a result of preoperative aspiration risk factors. Of the 1,145 cases that underwent LMA with NMBA, mean dose of rocuronium given was 20.4 mg, and no patients experienced pulmonary aspiration or anesthesia complications. Twenty-one cases (1.8%) required conversion to ETT as the result of poor LMA fit or ventilation leakage. ASA class was not associated with LMA-to-ETT conversion (P = .77). Mean airway manipulation time was 6.0 minutes (± 6.4), mean procedure duration was 100.3 minutes (± 48.7), and mean procedure end to airway removal time- 5.0 minutes (± 5.0). No surgical complications related to hip distraction or traction force occurred.

Conclusions

Administration of general anesthesia using LMA ventilation with a low dosage of neuromuscular blockade is safe and effective for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. The rate of conversion to endotracheal intubation was low and showed no association with ASA classification.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.
目的探讨低剂量神经肌肉阻断剂(NMBA)下喉罩通气(LMA)全身麻醉方案的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2014年至2024年在同一医院行股髋臼撞击综合征髋关节镜检查的患者。排除了因非股髋臼撞击综合征适应症而接受髋关节镜检查和同时行髋臼周围截骨术的患者。全身麻醉采用异丙酚和七氟醚,LMA通气。髋部牵张前给予低剂量(10- 50mg) NMBA剂(罗库溴铵)。主要观察结果为肺误吸。次要结局包括转换为ETT和手术室时间。结果共纳入1169例患者,其中女性49.8%,平均年龄37.8岁(±11.0),体重指数24.4(±3.9)。美国麻醉医师学会(ASA) I级占64.0%,II级占34.8%,III级占1.2%。在24例患者中,由于术前误吸危险因素,患者接受了ETT而没有尝试LMA。在1145例LMA合并NMBA患者中,给予罗库溴铵的平均剂量为20.4 mg,没有患者发生肺误吸或麻醉并发症。21例(1.8%)由于LMA配合不良或通风泄漏需要转换为ETT。ASA分级与lma - ett转换无关(P = 0.77)。平均气道操作时间为6.0分钟(±6.4),平均手术时间为100.3分钟(±48.7),平均手术结束至取出气道时间为5.0分钟(±5.0)。未发生与髋关节牵张或牵引力相关的手术并发症。结论全麻LMA通气加小剂量神经肌肉阻滞对髋关节镜手术患者安全有效。转归气管插管的比率较低,与ASA分级无关。证据水平:IV级,回顾性治疗病例系列。
{"title":"General Anesthesia Using Laryngeal Mask Airway Ventilation With Low-Dose Neuromuscular Blockade Is Safe and Effective for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy","authors":"Justin T. Jabara M.D. ,&nbsp;Jillian H. Neuner B.A. ,&nbsp;Akash Vasanthan M.S. ,&nbsp;Pedram Aleshi M.D. ,&nbsp;Sakura Kinjo M.D. ,&nbsp;Stephanie E. Wong M.D. ,&nbsp;Alan L. Zhang M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101218","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101218","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate safety and efficacy of a general anesthesia protocol using laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ventilation without endotracheal intubation (ETT) in the setting of a low dosage of neuromuscular blockade (NMBA) for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome at a single institution from 2014 to 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Those who underwent hip arthroscopy for non-femoroacetabular impingement syndrome indications and those with a concomitant periacetabular osteotomy were excluded. General anesthesia was administered with propofol and sevoflurane, with LMA ventilation. A low-dose (10-50 mg) NMBA agent (rocuronium) was given before hip distraction. The primary outcome of interest was pulmonary aspiration. Secondary outcomes of interest included conversion to ETT and operating room time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 1,169 cases (49.8% female) with mean age 37.8 years (± 11.0) and body mass index 24.4 (± 3.9). In total, 64.0% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I, 34.8% class II, and 1.2% class III. In 24 cases, patients underwent ETT without attempting LMA as a result of preoperative aspiration risk factors. Of the 1,145 cases that underwent LMA with NMBA, mean dose of rocuronium given was 20.4 mg, and no patients experienced pulmonary aspiration or anesthesia complications. Twenty-one cases (1.8%) required conversion to ETT as the result of poor LMA fit or ventilation leakage. ASA class was not associated with LMA-to-ETT conversion (<em>P</em> = .77). Mean airway manipulation time was 6.0 minutes (± 6.4), mean procedure duration was 100.3 minutes (± 48.7), and mean procedure end to airway removal time- 5.0 minutes (± 5.0). No surgical complications related to hip distraction or traction force occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Administration of general anesthesia using LMA ventilation with a low dosage of neuromuscular blockade is safe and effective for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. The rate of conversion to endotracheal intubation was low and showed no association with ASA classification.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aragonite-Based Scaffolds Are Effective Osteochondral Graft Substitutes for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review 文石支架是膝关节骨软骨缺损有效的骨软骨移植替代物:系统综述
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101215
Jonathan D. McKeeman M.D., Neil Jain M.D., Nigel Wang M.D., Ajay C. Kanakamedala M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes and complication profiles after the implantation of aragonite-based scaffold osteochondral substitutes for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee.

Methods

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we completed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases in January 2025 to obtain studies reporting on outcomes after implantation of an aragonite-based scaffold in patients with osteochondral defects of the knee. Clinical studies were assessed for patient-reported outcome measures, failure rates, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed and the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were applied to appraise study quality.

Results

Five studies were included for data analysis. In total, 526 patients with a mean age of 39.1 years (range, 31.6-42.0 years) were followed up for an average of 30.5 months (range, 12-78 months). Four studies evaluating Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores reported mean improvements of 16.1 to 41.0 from preoperatively to final follow-up. Three studies reported improvements of 23.1 to 43 in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form scores. Failure, defined as any secondary intervention on the index knee, occurred in 0% to 13.6% of cases, and these rates were significantly lower than those for microfracture and arthroscopic debridement. Tapered scaffolds had lower failure rates than cylindrical designs (0% vs 8%-10.5%).

Conclusions

Aragonite-based scaffolds in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee show improved patient-reported outcomes and low failure rates at mean follow-up durations ranging from 12 to 78 months.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level I and IV studies.
目的评价文石基骨软骨替代物支架治疗膝关节骨软骨病变的疗效及并发症。方法使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们于2025年1月完成了PubMed、Embase和Medline数据库的全面搜索,以获得关于文石基支架植入膝关节骨软骨缺损患者后结果的研究报告。临床研究评估了患者报告的结果测量、失败率和磁共振成像结果。进行偏倚风险评估,并采用非随机研究方法学指数(Methodological Index for non -random Studies,未成年人)标准评价研究质量。结果纳入5项研究进行数据分析。总共526例患者,平均年龄39.1岁(范围31.6-42.0岁),平均随访30.5个月(范围12-78个月)。四项评估膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分的研究报告称,从术前到最终随访,平均改善16.1至41.0。三项研究报告国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节形态评分从23.1分提高到43分。失败,定义为对膝关节的任何二次干预,发生在0%至13.6%的病例中,这些比率明显低于微骨折和关节镜清创。锥形支架的故障率低于圆柱形支架(0% vs 8%-10.5%)。结论:基于saragonite的支架治疗膝关节骨软骨病变,在平均随访时间12至78个月期间,患者报告的结果有所改善,失败率较低。证据水平:IV级,对I级和IV级研究的系统评价。
{"title":"Aragonite-Based Scaffolds Are Effective Osteochondral Graft Substitutes for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jonathan D. McKeeman M.D.,&nbsp;Neil Jain M.D.,&nbsp;Nigel Wang M.D.,&nbsp;Ajay C. Kanakamedala M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101215","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101215","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the outcomes and complication profiles after the implantation of aragonite-based scaffold osteochondral substitutes for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we completed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases in January 2025 to obtain studies reporting on outcomes after implantation of an aragonite-based scaffold in patients with osteochondral defects of the knee. Clinical studies were assessed for patient-reported outcome measures, failure rates, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed and the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were applied to appraise study quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five studies were included for data analysis. In total, 526 patients with a mean age of 39.1 years (range, 31.6-42.0 years) were followed up for an average of 30.5 months (range, 12-78 months). Four studies evaluating Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores reported mean improvements of 16.1 to 41.0 from preoperatively to final follow-up. Three studies reported improvements of 23.1 to 43 in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form scores. Failure, defined as any secondary intervention on the index knee, occurred in 0% to 13.6% of cases, and these rates were significantly lower than those for microfracture and arthroscopic debridement. Tapered scaffolds had lower failure rates than cylindrical designs (0% vs 8%-10.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Aragonite-based scaffolds in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee show improved patient-reported outcomes and low failure rates at mean follow-up durations ranging from 12 to 78 months.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level I and IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large Language Models Show Comparable Response Performance but Vary in Readability Regarding Patient Questions on Hip Arthroscopy 大型语言模型显示出可比较的反应性能,但在髋关节镜检查患者问题的可读性上有所不同
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101229
Jeffrey S. Mun B.A. , Srish S. Chenna B.S.E. , Rachel L. Poutre B.A. , Brandon J. Allen B.A. , Stephen M. Gillinov M.D. , Frederick Mun M.D. , James R. Satalich M.D. , Richard M. Wilk M.D. , Scott D. Martin M.D.

Purpose

To compare the quality of large language model (LLM) responses to frequently asked questions regarding hip arthroscopy, assess the incorrect response rate of LLMs, and compare the readability among different LLM outputs.

Methods

Three LLMs, including OpenAI Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5, Microsoft Co-Pilot, and Google Gemini, were each queried with 10 frequently asked questions regarding hip arthroscopy. Two high-volume hip arthroscopists graded the responses on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = excellent, requiring no clarification; 2 = satisfactory, requiring minimal clarification; 3 = satisfactory, requiring moderate clarification; and 4 = unsatisfactory, requiring substantial clarification). Additionally, the 2 graders ranked the responses from the 3 different LLMs for each of the 10 questions on a 3-point Likert scale (1 = best, 2 = intermediate, 3 = worst). Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease metrics.

Results

Commonly used LLMs performed on a similar level of response accuracy and adequacy (mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 3.0 ± 1.0 vs Microsoft: 2.9 ± 1.1 vs Gemini: 2.6 ± 1.1, P = .481). Reviewers had no preference for one LLM’s responses over another (mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 2.0 ± 0.8 vs Microsoft: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs Gemini: 2.0 ± 0.8, P = .931). The overall incorrect response rate among LLMs was 20%. ChatGPT responses were at a significantly worse reading level compared to Gemini and Microsoft outputs (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 11.0 ± 2.2 grade reading level vs Microsoft: 8.6 ± 2.3 vs Gemini: 6.6 ± 2.2, P = .003; Flesch Reading Ease mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 36.6 ± 19.0 vs Microsoft: 57.7 ± 13.3 vs Gemini: 65.0 ± 4.7, P = .001).

Conclusions

Hip arthroscopists find LLM outputs on patient questions regarding hip arthroscopy satisfactory but requiring moderate clarification and show no preference for one LLM’s responses over another. LLMs produce a substantial number of incorrect responses. ChatGPT outputs had a significantly worse reading level compared to those of Microsoft and Gemini.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides insights into the accuracy and readability of LLM-generated responses to commonly asked questions about hip arthroscopy. As patients increasingly turn to artificial intelligence tools for health information, understanding the quality and potential risks of misinformation becomes essential.
目的比较大语言模型(LLM)对髋关节镜常见问题的回答质量,评估LLM的错误回答率,并比较不同LLM输出的可读性。方法对OpenAI Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5、Microsoft Co-Pilot和谷歌Gemini 3个llm分别进行10个有关髋关节镜检查的常见问题的询问。两名大容量髋关节镜检查师按照李克特4分制对患者的反应进行评分(1 =优秀,无需澄清;2 =满意,需要最少的澄清;3 =满意,需要适度澄清;4 =不满意,需要大量澄清)。此外,两位评分者将3位法学硕士对10个问题中的每一个问题的回答按3分李克特量表(1 =最好,2 =中等,3 =最差)进行排名。使用Flesch- kincaid Grade Level和Flesch Reading Ease量表评估可读性。结果常用LLMs的反应准确性和充分性水平相似(平均±SD: ChatGPT: 3.0±1.0 vs Microsoft: 2.9±1.1 vs Gemini: 2.6±1.1,P = .481)。审稿人对一个法学硕士的回答没有偏好(平均±SD: ChatGPT: 2.0±0.8 vs Microsoft: 2.1±0.9 vs Gemini: 2.0±0.8,P = 0.931)。法学硕士的总体错误率为20%。ChatGPT应答的阅读水平明显低于Gemini和Microsoft输出(Flesch- kincaid Grade level平均值±SD: ChatGPT: 11.0±2.2阅读水平与Microsoft: 8.6±2.3与Gemini: 6.6±2.2,P = 0.003; Flesch reading Ease平均值±SD: ChatGPT: 36.6±19.0与Microsoft: 57.7±13.3与Gemini: 65.0±4.7,P = 0.001)。结论关节镜专家发现LLM对患者髋关节镜问题的回答令人满意,但需要适度的澄清,并且LLM的回答并不优先于另一个。法学硕士产生了大量的错误回答。ChatGPT输出的阅读水平明显低于微软和Gemini。临床相关性本研究提供了llm生成的关于髋关节镜常见问题的回答的准确性和可读性的见解。随着患者越来越多地转向人工智能工具获取健康信息,了解错误信息的质量和潜在风险变得至关重要。
{"title":"Large Language Models Show Comparable Response Performance but Vary in Readability Regarding Patient Questions on Hip Arthroscopy","authors":"Jeffrey S. Mun B.A. ,&nbsp;Srish S. Chenna B.S.E. ,&nbsp;Rachel L. Poutre B.A. ,&nbsp;Brandon J. Allen B.A. ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Gillinov M.D. ,&nbsp;Frederick Mun M.D. ,&nbsp;James R. Satalich M.D. ,&nbsp;Richard M. Wilk M.D. ,&nbsp;Scott D. Martin M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101229","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101229","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the quality of large language model (LLM) responses to frequently asked questions regarding hip arthroscopy, assess the incorrect response rate of LLMs, and compare the readability among different LLM outputs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three LLMs, including OpenAI Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5, Microsoft Co-Pilot, and Google Gemini, were each queried with 10 frequently asked questions regarding hip arthroscopy. Two high-volume hip arthroscopists graded the responses on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = excellent, requiring no clarification; 2 = satisfactory, requiring minimal clarification; 3 = satisfactory, requiring moderate clarification; and 4 = unsatisfactory, requiring substantial clarification). Additionally, the 2 graders ranked the responses from the 3 different LLMs for each of the 10 questions on a 3-point Likert scale (1 = best, 2 = intermediate, 3 = worst). Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Commonly used LLMs performed on a similar level of response accuracy and adequacy (mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 3.0 ± 1.0 vs Microsoft: 2.9 ± 1.1 vs Gemini: 2.6 ± 1.1, <em>P</em> = .481). Reviewers had no preference for one LLM’s responses over another (mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 2.0 ± 0.8 vs Microsoft: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs Gemini: 2.0 ± 0.8, <em>P</em> = .931). The overall incorrect response rate among LLMs was 20%. ChatGPT responses were at a significantly worse reading level compared to Gemini and Microsoft outputs (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 11.0 ± 2.2 grade reading level vs Microsoft: 8.6 ± 2.3 vs Gemini: 6.6 ± 2.2, <em>P</em> = .003; Flesch Reading Ease mean ± SD: ChatGPT: 36.6 ± 19.0 vs Microsoft: 57.7 ± 13.3 vs Gemini: 65.0 ± 4.7, <em>P</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hip arthroscopists find LLM outputs on patient questions regarding hip arthroscopy satisfactory but requiring moderate clarification and show no preference for one LLM’s responses over another. LLMs produce a substantial number of incorrect responses. ChatGPT outputs had a significantly worse reading level compared to those of Microsoft and Gemini.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>This study provides insights into the accuracy and readability of LLM-generated responses to commonly asked questions about hip arthroscopy. As patients increasingly turn to artificial intelligence tools for health information, understanding the quality and potential risks of misinformation becomes essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Augmenting an Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Collagen Matrix and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injection Appears Safe and Produces Favorable Clinical Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up 在2年的随访中,胶原基质和骨髓抽吸浓缩液注射增强同种异体前交叉韧带重建是安全的,并产生了良好的临床结果
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101209
Steve E. Jordan M.D. , Adam W. Anz M.D. , Roger V. Ostrander III M.D. , Eric A. Branch M.D. , Thomas S. Denney Ph.D. , Achraf Cohen Ph.D. , Jessi Truett Ed.D., B.C.B.A. , James R. Andrews M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes of augmenting an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) allograft with an amnion matrix wrap and injecting bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC).

Methods

We enrolled 10 ACL reconstruction patients aged 22-60 years with hamstring allografts wrapped with an amnion collagen matrix and injected with BMAC in this prospective case series. Participants completed physical therapy and reported outcomes for 2 years. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were mapped/processed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, yielding mean transverse relations time constant (T2∗) and volume values for grafts and bone tunnel integration.

Results

We assessed the longitudinal outcomes of allograft augmentation using descriptive statistics and confidence intervals, showing significant increases in average Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS5) and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores (KOOS5: Baseline-24 months [m] = 64.2-84.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.14-32.56, SANE: Baseline-24m = 33.8-87.9, 95% CI 38.71-64.87). Average Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical scores significantly increased from baseline to 24 months postoperation (Baseline-24m = 35.1-49.6, 95% CI 8.25-20.30). Average visual analog scale for pain scores significantly decreased from baseline at all time points except 2 weeks postoperation (baseline-2 weeks = 2.7-3.6, 95% CI −0.19 to 2.07) starting at 6 weeks postoperation (baseline-6 weeks = 2.7-1.3, 95% CI −2.52 to −0.26) and remained significantly lower than baseline to 24 months postoperation (baseline-24m = 2.7-0.6, 95% CI− 3.27 to −0.85). Average Max Activity Scale scores were significantly decreased from baseline starting at 12 months postoperation (baseline-12m = 6.3-2.7, 95% CI −6.32 to −0.88) but returned to baseline levels at 24-months postoperation (Baseline-24m = 6.3-5.8, 95% CI −4.45 to 1.45). There were no significant differences in VR-12 mental component scores or magnetic resonance imaging measures. No infections nor reconstruction failures occurred after 2 years.

Conclusions

This case series demonstrated augmenting hamstring allograft ACL reconstruction with an amnion collagen matrix and injecting BMAC appeared to be safe, and clinical outcomes were favorable up to 2 years postoperation despite having no quantifiable effect on graft maturation.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.
目的探讨羊膜基质包裹增强同种异体前交叉韧带(ACL)的临床效果。方法我们招募了10例22-60岁的前交叉韧带重建患者,他们采用羊膜胶原基质包裹的同种异体腘绳肌腱移植并注射BMAC。参与者完成了物理治疗并报告了2年的结果。术后3、6、9和12个月的磁共振成像扫描被绘制/处理,得到移植物和骨隧道整合的平均横向关系时间常数(T2∗)和体积值。结果我们使用描述性统计和可信区间评估同种异体移植增强的纵向结果,显示平均膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS5)和单一评估数值评估(SANE)评分显著增加(KOOS5:基线-24个月[m] = 64.2-84.8, 95%可信区间[CI] 9.14-32.56, SANE:基线-24m = 33.8-87.9, 95% CI 38.71-64.87)。平均退伍军人RAND 12项健康调查(VR-12)身体评分从基线到术后24个月显著增加(基线-24m = 35.1-49.6, 95% CI 8.25-20.30)。从术后6周(基线-6周= 2.7-1.3,95% CI - 2.52至- 0.26)开始,疼痛评分的平均视觉模拟量表在除术后2周(基线-2周= 2.7-3.6,95% CI - 0.19至- 2.07)以外的所有时间点均较基线显著下降,并且在术后24个月(基线-24m = 2.7-0.6, 95% CI - 3.27至- 0.85)仍显著低于基线。平均最大活动量表评分从术后12个月开始较基线显著下降(基线-12m = 6.3-2.7, 95% CI - 6.32至- 0.88),但在术后24个月恢复到基线水平(基线-24m = 6.3-5.8, 95% CI - 4.45至1.45)。在VR-12心理成分评分或磁共振成像测量方面没有显著差异。2年后无感染和重建失败。结论:本病例系列表明羊膜胶原基质增强同种异体腘绳肌腱韧带重建和注射BMAC是安全的,尽管对移植物成熟没有可量化的影响,但术后2年的临床结果是有利的。证据水平:IV级,治疗性病例系列。
{"title":"Augmenting an Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Collagen Matrix and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injection Appears Safe and Produces Favorable Clinical Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up","authors":"Steve E. Jordan M.D. ,&nbsp;Adam W. Anz M.D. ,&nbsp;Roger V. Ostrander III M.D. ,&nbsp;Eric A. Branch M.D. ,&nbsp;Thomas S. Denney Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Achraf Cohen Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jessi Truett Ed.D., B.C.B.A. ,&nbsp;James R. Andrews M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101209","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101209","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate clinical outcomes of augmenting an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) allograft with an amnion matrix wrap and injecting bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 10 ACL reconstruction patients aged 22-60 years with hamstring allografts wrapped with an amnion collagen matrix and injected with BMAC in this prospective case series. Participants completed physical therapy and reported outcomes for 2 years. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were mapped/processed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, yielding mean transverse relations time constant (T2∗) and volume values for grafts and bone tunnel integration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We assessed the longitudinal outcomes of allograft augmentation using descriptive statistics and confidence intervals, showing significant increases in average Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS<sub>5</sub>) and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores (KOOS<sub>5</sub>: Baseline-24 months [m] = 64.2-84.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.14-32.56, SANE: Baseline-24m = 33.8-87.9, 95% CI 38.71-64.87). Average Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical scores significantly increased from baseline to 24 months postoperation (Baseline-24m = 35.1-49.6, 95% CI 8.25-20.30). Average visual analog scale for pain scores significantly decreased from baseline at all time points except 2 weeks postoperation (baseline-2 weeks = 2.7-3.6, 95% CI −0.19 to 2.07) starting at 6 weeks postoperation (baseline-6 weeks = 2.7-1.3, 95% CI −2.52 to −0.26) and remained significantly lower than baseline to 24 months postoperation (baseline-24m = 2.7-0.6, 95% CI− 3.27 to −0.85). Average Max Activity Scale scores were significantly decreased from baseline starting at 12 months postoperation (baseline-12m = 6.3-2.7, 95% CI −6.32 to −0.88) but returned to baseline levels at 24-months postoperation (Baseline-24m = 6.3-5.8, 95% CI −4.45 to 1.45). There were no significant differences in VR-12 mental component scores or magnetic resonance imaging measures. No infections nor reconstruction failures occurred after 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This case series demonstrated augmenting hamstring allograft ACL reconstruction with an amnion collagen matrix and injecting BMAC appeared to be safe, and clinical outcomes were favorable up to 2 years postoperation despite having no quantifiable effect on graft maturation.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, therapeutic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pickleball-Related Geriatric Fractures and Pediatric Equipment-Related Injuries Are Increasing in Emergency Departments Across the United States 匹克球相关的老年人骨折和儿科设备相关的伤害在美国各地的急诊科正在增加
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101228
Philip M. Lee B.S. , Ryan Nishi B.S. , Kyle K. Obana M.D. , Sean M. Chan M.D. , Jae K. You M.D. , Jennifer M. Weiss M.D. , William N. Levine M.D. , David P. Trofa M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the epidemiology, prevalence, and mechanism of injury of pickleball-related injuries in patients presenting to emergency departments in the United States.

Methods

Data between 2004 and 2023 from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System were analyzed for racquetball-related injuries. The data set was screened for pickleball-related injuries using keywords. Data included body part, diagnosis, mechanism of injury, and disposition. Calculations used corresponding hospital sample weights for national estimates (NEs). Patients were divided into the following age groups: pediatric (<18 years), 19 to 39 years, 40 to 59 years, and 60 years or older.

Results

A total of 1,714 injuries (NE, 99,816 [98.8%]) were included. The most commonly injured body locations were the upper trunk (n = 232) (NE, 14,884 [13.5%]), head (n = 226) (NE, 12,990 [13.2%]), and knee (n = 188) (NE, 10,700 [10.9%]). The most identified final diagnoses were fracture (n = 493) (NE, 27,493 [28.7%]), sprain/strain (n = 423) (NE, 25,237 [24.7%]), internal organ damage (n = 168) (NE, 10,050 [9.8%]), and contusion (n = 163) (NE, 9,573 [9.5%]). The most identified mechanisms of injury were impact with the floor (n = 856) (NE, 50,797 [49.9%]), exertional cardiovascular event (n = 244) (NE, 15,796 [14.2%]), and non-contact movement (n = 222) (NE, 12,936 [13.0%]). Pediatric patients had the highest proportion of head injuries (NE, 222 [16.9%]) and injuries from equipment (NE, 634 [32.2%]). The group aged 60 years or older had the highest proportion of wrist injuries (NE, 10,302 [13.0%]), fractures (NE, 17,802 [32.8%]), and injuries cause by impact with the floor (NE, 43,592 [56.1%]). Additionally, this group had the highest proportion of upper trunk injuries (NE, 12,947 [15.4%]) and exertional chest pain (NE, 13,789 [16.2%]).

Conclusions

Pickleball injuries most frequently involved the upper trunk, head, and knee, with fractures and sprains/strains being the most common diagnoses. Nearly half of all pickleball injuries resulted from impacts with the floor. Pediatric patients had a higher proportion of head injuries and equipment-related trauma, whereas older adults (≥60 years) were more prone to wrist and upper trunk injuries, fractures, and exertional chest pain.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective epidemiologic case series.
目的评估美国急诊患者匹克球相关损伤的流行病学、患病率和损伤机制。方法分析2004 - 2023年国家电子伤害监测系统中与壁球相关的伤害数据。数据集使用关键词筛选匹克球相关损伤。资料包括身体部位、诊断、损伤机制和处置。计算使用相应的医院样本权重进行国家估计(NEs)。患者分为以下年龄组:儿科(18岁)、19至39岁、40至59岁和60岁及以上。结果共纳入损伤1,714例,其中NE 99,816例(98.8%)。最常见的身体损伤部位为上躯干(n = 232) (NE, 14,884[13.5%])、头部(n = 226) (NE, 12,990[13.2%])和膝关节(n = 188) (NE, 10,700[10.9%])。最常见的最终诊断为骨折(n = 493) (NE, 27,493[28.7%]),扭伤/拉伤(n = 423) (NE, 25,237[24.7%]),内脏器官损伤(n = 168) (NE, 10,050[9.8%])和挫伤(n = 163) (NE, 9,573[9.5%])。最明确的损伤机制是撞击地板(n = 856) (NE, 50,797[49.9%]),用力性心血管事件(n = 244) (NE, 15,796[14.2%])和非接触性运动(n = 222) (NE, 12,936[13.0%])。儿科患者的头部损伤比例最高(NE, 222例[16.9%]),设备损伤比例最高(NE, 634例[32.2%])。60岁及以上年龄组腕部损伤(NE, 10,302例[13.0%])、骨折(NE, 17,802例[32.8%])和撞击地板损伤(NE, 43,592例[56.1%])所占比例最高。此外,该组上干损伤比例最高(NE, 12,947例[15.4%]),运动性胸痛比例最高(NE, 13,789例[16.2%])。结论匹克球损伤多见于上肢、头部和膝关节,骨折和扭伤/拉伤是最常见的诊断。几乎一半的匹克球损伤是由于撞击地板造成的。儿科患者有较高比例的头部损伤和器械相关创伤,而老年人(≥60岁)更容易发生手腕和上肢损伤、骨折和运动性胸痛。证据水平:IV级,回顾性流行病学病例系列。
{"title":"Pickleball-Related Geriatric Fractures and Pediatric Equipment-Related Injuries Are Increasing in Emergency Departments Across the United States","authors":"Philip M. Lee B.S. ,&nbsp;Ryan Nishi B.S. ,&nbsp;Kyle K. Obana M.D. ,&nbsp;Sean M. Chan M.D. ,&nbsp;Jae K. You M.D. ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Weiss M.D. ,&nbsp;William N. Levine M.D. ,&nbsp;David P. Trofa M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101228","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101228","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the epidemiology, prevalence, and mechanism of injury of pickleball-related injuries in patients presenting to emergency departments in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data between 2004 and 2023 from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System were analyzed for racquetball-related injuries. The data set was screened for pickleball-related injuries using keywords. Data included body part, diagnosis, mechanism of injury, and disposition. Calculations used corresponding hospital sample weights for national estimates (NEs). Patients were divided into the following age groups: pediatric (&lt;18 years), 19 to 39 years, 40 to 59 years, and 60 years or older.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,714 injuries (NE, 99,816 [98.8%]) were included. The most commonly injured body locations were the upper trunk (n = 232) (NE, 14,884 [13.5%]), head (n = 226) (NE, 12,990 [13.2%]), and knee (n = 188) (NE, 10,700 [10.9%]). The most identified final diagnoses were fracture (n = 493) (NE, 27,493 [28.7%]), sprain/strain (n = 423) (NE, 25,237 [24.7%]), internal organ damage (n = 168) (NE, 10,050 [9.8%]), and contusion (n = 163) (NE, 9,573 [9.5%]). The most identified mechanisms of injury were impact with the floor (n = 856) (NE, 50,797 [49.9%]), exertional cardiovascular event (n = 244) (NE, 15,796 [14.2%]), and non-contact movement (n = 222) (NE, 12,936 [13.0%]). Pediatric patients had the highest proportion of head injuries (NE, 222 [16.9%]) and injuries from equipment (NE, 634 [32.2%]). The group aged 60 years or older had the highest proportion of wrist injuries (NE, 10,302 [13.0%]), fractures (NE, 17,802 [32.8%]), and injuries cause by impact with the floor (NE, 43,592 [56.1%]). Additionally, this group had the highest proportion of upper trunk injuries (NE, 12,947 [15.4%]) and exertional chest pain (NE, 13,789 [16.2%]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pickleball injuries most frequently involved the upper trunk, head, and knee, with fractures and sprains/strains being the most common diagnoses. Nearly half of all pickleball injuries resulted from impacts with the floor. Pediatric patients had a higher proportion of head injuries and equipment-related trauma, whereas older adults (≥60 years) were more prone to wrist and upper trunk injuries, fractures, and exertional chest pain.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective epidemiologic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current Classification Systems for Knee Ligament Injuries Are Limited to Ligament Involvement and Do Not Consider Injury Mechanism or Sequence of Injury: A Scoping Review 当前膝关节韧带损伤的分类系统仅限于韧带受累程度,而不考虑损伤机制或损伤顺序:一项范围综述
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101207
Jelle P. van der List M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A. , Roy A.G. Hoogeslag M.D., Ph.D.

Purpose

To systematically assess published classification systems for knee ligament injuries and to propose a comprehensive, multiplanar, sequential knee ligament classification system that improves upon those in the published literature.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to January 2025 for studies reporting knee classification systems. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting knee classification systems and English language. Exclusion criteria consisted of classifications only describing specific type of knee injuries (e.g., only anterior cruciate ligament injuries). The characteristics of each classification system were recorded and analyzed descriptively. A classification system was proposed that addresses the weaknesses of the existing systems.

Results

A total of 6 classification systems were identified in 8 studies in the literature and were published between 1975 and 2009. Existing classification systems were strong in correlating type of injuries with rotatory ligamentous laxity and physical examination findings but were lacking assessment of knee position during injury, discussion of sequence of injuries, involvement of bone marrow edema (except one study), and lack of correlation with knee dislocations. No clinical validation was performed. A knee classification system was created that included sequence of injuries, correlation with knee dislocation and injury mechanism, and bone marrow edema.

Conclusions

Knee injury classification systems lack comprehensive consideration of injury mechanism, sequence of injury, bone marrow edema, meniscus and chondral damage, involved ligaments, rotatory instability, and correlation with knee dislocation. The sequence of injury to these structures could be relevant to understanding injury mechanism and treatment, but requires validation.

Level of Evidence

Level V, systematic review of level IV-V studies.
目的系统评估已发表的膝关节韧带损伤分类系统,并在已有文献的基础上提出一个全面、多平面、顺序的膝关节韧带分类系统。方法遵循系统评价和meta分析指南的首选报告项目。检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane从成立到2025年1月报道膝关节分类系统的研究。纳入标准包括报道膝关节分类系统和英语语言的研究。排除标准包括仅描述特定类型膝关节损伤的分类(例如,仅前交叉韧带损伤)。对各分类体系的特征进行了记录和描述性分析。针对现有分类系统的不足,提出了一种分类系统。结果1975 - 2009年间发表的8篇文献研究共鉴定出6个分类体系。现有的分类系统在损伤类型与旋转韧带松弛和体格检查结果之间的相关性很强,但缺乏对损伤时膝关节位置的评估、损伤顺序的讨论、骨髓水肿的累及(除一项研究外),以及与膝关节脱位的相关性。没有进行临床验证。建立了膝关节分类系统,包括损伤顺序、与膝关节脱位和损伤机制的相关性以及骨髓水肿。结论膝关节损伤分类系统缺乏综合考虑损伤机制、损伤顺序、骨髓水肿、半月板和软骨损伤、累及韧带、旋转不稳定以及与膝关节脱位的相关性。这些结构的损伤顺序可能与了解损伤机制和治疗有关,但需要验证。证据水平:V级,IV-V级研究的系统评价。
{"title":"Current Classification Systems for Knee Ligament Injuries Are Limited to Ligament Involvement and Do Not Consider Injury Mechanism or Sequence of Injury: A Scoping Review","authors":"Jelle P. van der List M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A. ,&nbsp;Roy A.G. Hoogeslag M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101207","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101207","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To systematically assess published classification systems for knee ligament injuries and to propose a comprehensive, multiplanar, sequential knee ligament classification system that improves upon those in the published literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to January 2025 for studies reporting knee classification systems. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting knee classification systems and English language. Exclusion criteria consisted of classifications only describing specific type of knee injuries (e.g., only anterior cruciate ligament injuries). The characteristics of each classification system were recorded and analyzed descriptively. A classification system was proposed that addresses the weaknesses of the existing systems.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 6 classification systems were identified in 8 studies in the literature and were published between 1975 and 2009. Existing classification systems were strong in correlating type of injuries with rotatory ligamentous laxity and physical examination findings but were lacking assessment of knee position during injury, discussion of sequence of injuries, involvement of bone marrow edema (except one study), and lack of correlation with knee dislocations. No clinical validation was performed. A knee classification system was created that included sequence of injuries, correlation with knee dislocation and injury mechanism, and bone marrow edema.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Knee injury classification systems lack comprehensive consideration of injury mechanism, sequence of injury, bone marrow edema, meniscus and chondral damage, involved ligaments, rotatory instability, and correlation with knee dislocation. The sequence of injury to these structures could be relevant to understanding injury mechanism and treatment, but requires validation.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level V, systematic review of level IV-V studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy Is Associated With Improved Outcomes of Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review 联合髋关节镜与股骨头骨坏死核心减压的改善结果相关:一项系统综述
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101225
Ady H. Kahana-Rojkind M.D. , Paras P. Shah B.A. , Krishi Rana B.A. , Nils Becker M.D. , Roger Quesada-Jimenez M.D. , Benjamin G. Domb M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of core decompression (CD) with concomitant arthroscopic treatment of intra-articular pathologies for improving outcomes for patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and intra-articular pathology and to compare results with patients undergoing isolated CD.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases through July 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing CD with and without hip arthroscopy (HA) were included, provided they reported patient-reported outcomes (PROs), survivorship, or total hip arthroplasty (THA) conversion rates. Studies were excluded if HA was solely diagnostic. Quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions. Data extracted included demographics, surgical techniques, PROs, and THA-free survivorship.

Results

Six studies (4 Level III, 2 Level IV) met the inclusion criteria, comprising 632 hips with mean ages ranging from 35.5 to 41.1 years. All studies reported pre- and postoperative Harris Hip Score, and one included visual analog scale pain scores. Patients undergoing CD with HA had significantly greater postoperative Harris Hip Score (71.41-93.33) and improved THA-free survivorship compared with CD alone. Three of four comparative studies showed significantly lower THA conversion rates and femoral head collapse in the HA group. However, no study directly showed that HA improved bone healing.

Conclusions

CD with HA results in better PROs and femoral head survivorship compared with CD alone, likely because of intra-articular pathology treatment and improved joint function. Core decompression with concomitant hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular pathology should be considered for pre-collapse ONFH.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
目的评价骨芯减压(CD)联合关节镜治疗关节内病变对改善股骨头坏死(ONFH)患者预后和关节内病变的效果,并与单纯CD治疗患者的结果进行比较。方法采用PubMed、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统文献综述,截止2024年7月。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。比较CD与不进行髋关节镜检查(HA)的研究被纳入,前提是他们报告了患者报告的结果(PROs)、生存率或全髋关节置换术(THA)转换率。如果HA仅是诊断性的,则排除研究。使用非随机研究的方法学指数和干预措施的非随机研究的偏倚风险来评估质量。提取的数据包括人口统计学、手术技术、PROs和无tha生存率。结果6项研究(4项III级研究,2项IV级研究)符合纳入标准,包括632例髋关节,平均年龄35.5 ~ 41.1岁。所有研究报告了术前和术后Harris髋关节评分,其中一项包括视觉模拟疼痛评分。与单独CD相比,接受CD合并HA的患者术后Harris髋关节评分(71.41-93.33)显著提高,无tha生存率显著提高。4个比较研究中有3个显示HA组THA转换率和股骨头塌陷明显降低。然而,没有研究直接表明透明质酸能促进骨愈合。结论与单纯CD相比,HA合并scd具有更好的pro和股骨头存活率,这可能与关节内病理治疗和关节功能改善有关。对于塌陷前的ONFH,应考虑椎体减压合并髋关节镜检查以解决关节内病理问题。证据水平:IV级,III级和IV级研究的系统评价。
{"title":"Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy Is Associated With Improved Outcomes of Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review","authors":"Ady H. Kahana-Rojkind M.D. ,&nbsp;Paras P. Shah B.A. ,&nbsp;Krishi Rana B.A. ,&nbsp;Nils Becker M.D. ,&nbsp;Roger Quesada-Jimenez M.D. ,&nbsp;Benjamin G. Domb M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101225","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101225","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of core decompression (CD) with concomitant arthroscopic treatment of intra-articular pathologies for improving outcomes for patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and intra-articular pathology and to compare results with patients undergoing isolated CD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases through July 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing CD with and without hip arthroscopy (HA) were included, provided they reported patient-reported outcomes (PROs), survivorship, or total hip arthroplasty (THA) conversion rates. Studies were excluded if HA was solely diagnostic. Quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions. Data extracted included demographics, surgical techniques, PROs, and THA-free survivorship.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies (4 Level III, 2 Level IV) met the inclusion criteria, comprising 632 hips with mean ages ranging from 35.5 to 41.1 years. All studies reported pre- and postoperative Harris Hip Score, and one included visual analog scale pain scores. Patients undergoing CD with HA had significantly greater postoperative Harris Hip Score (71.41-93.33) and improved THA-free survivorship compared with CD alone. Three of four comparative studies showed significantly lower THA conversion rates and femoral head collapse in the HA group. However, no study directly showed that HA improved bone healing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CD with HA results in better PROs and femoral head survivorship compared with CD alone, likely because of intra-articular pathology treatment and improved joint function. Core decompression with concomitant hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular pathology should be considered for pre-collapse ONFH.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 101225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145479048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1