News event memory in amnestic and non-amnestic MCI, heritable risk for dementia, and subjective memory complaints

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108887
Isabel Asp , Andrew T.J. Cawley-Bennett , Jennifer C. Frascino , Shahrokh Golshan , Mark W. Bondi , Christine N. Smith
{"title":"News event memory in amnestic and non-amnestic MCI, heritable risk for dementia, and subjective memory complaints","authors":"Isabel Asp ,&nbsp;Andrew T.J. Cawley-Bennett ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Frascino ,&nbsp;Shahrokh Golshan ,&nbsp;Mark W. Bondi ,&nbsp;Christine N. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Robust and sensitive clinical measures are needed for more accurate and earlier detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD), for staging preclinical AD, and for gauging the efficacy of treatments. Mild impairment on episodic memory tests is thought to indicate a cognitive risk of developing AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), considered to be a transitional stage between normal aging and AD. Novel tests of semantic memory, such as memory for news events, are also impaired early on but have received little clinical attention even though they may provide a novel way to assess cognitive risk for AD. We examined memory for news events in older adults with normal cognition (NC, N = 34), amnestic MCI (aMCI, N = 27), or non-aMCI (N = 10) using the Retrograde Memory News Events Test (RM-NET). We asked if news event memory was sensitive to 1) aMCI and also non-aMCI, which has rarely been examined, 2) genetic risk for dementia (positive family history of any type of dementia, presence of an APOE-4 allele, or polygenic risk for AD), and 3) subjective memory functioning judgments about the past. We found that both MCI subgroups exhibited impaired RM-NET Lifespan accuracy scores together with temporally-limited retrograde amnesia. For the aMCI group amnesia extended back 45 years prior to testing, but not beyond that time frame. The extent of retrograde amnesia could not be reliably estimated in the small non-aMCI group. The effect sizes of having MCI on the RM-NET were medium for the non-aMCI group and large for the aMCI group, whereas the effect sizes of participant characteristics on RM-NET accuracy scores were small. For the combined MCI group (N = 37), news event memory was significantly related to positive family history of dementia but was not related to the more specific genetic markers of AD risk. For the NC group, news event memory was not related to any measure of genetic risk. Objective measures of past memory from the RM-NET were not related to subjective memory judgements about the present or the recent past in either group. By contrast, when individuals subjectively compared their present versus past memory abilities, there was a significant association between this judgment and objective measures of the past from the RM-NET (direct association for the NC group and inverse for the MCI group). The RM-NET holds significant promise for early identification of those with cognitive and genetic risk factors for AD and non-AD dementias.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robust and sensitive clinical measures are needed for more accurate and earlier detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD), for staging preclinical AD, and for gauging the efficacy of treatments. Mild impairment on episodic memory tests is thought to indicate a cognitive risk of developing AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), considered to be a transitional stage between normal aging and AD. Novel tests of semantic memory, such as memory for news events, are also impaired early on but have received little clinical attention even though they may provide a novel way to assess cognitive risk for AD. We examined memory for news events in older adults with normal cognition (NC, N = 34), amnestic MCI (aMCI, N = 27), or non-aMCI (N = 10) using the Retrograde Memory News Events Test (RM-NET). We asked if news event memory was sensitive to 1) aMCI and also non-aMCI, which has rarely been examined, 2) genetic risk for dementia (positive family history of any type of dementia, presence of an APOE-4 allele, or polygenic risk for AD), and 3) subjective memory functioning judgments about the past. We found that both MCI subgroups exhibited impaired RM-NET Lifespan accuracy scores together with temporally-limited retrograde amnesia. For the aMCI group amnesia extended back 45 years prior to testing, but not beyond that time frame. The extent of retrograde amnesia could not be reliably estimated in the small non-aMCI group. The effect sizes of having MCI on the RM-NET were medium for the non-aMCI group and large for the aMCI group, whereas the effect sizes of participant characteristics on RM-NET accuracy scores were small. For the combined MCI group (N = 37), news event memory was significantly related to positive family history of dementia but was not related to the more specific genetic markers of AD risk. For the NC group, news event memory was not related to any measure of genetic risk. Objective measures of past memory from the RM-NET were not related to subjective memory judgements about the present or the recent past in either group. By contrast, when individuals subjectively compared their present versus past memory abilities, there was a significant association between this judgment and objective measures of the past from the RM-NET (direct association for the NC group and inverse for the MCI group). The RM-NET holds significant promise for early identification of those with cognitive and genetic risk factors for AD and non-AD dementias.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有记忆障碍和无记忆障碍 MCI 的新闻事件记忆、痴呆症遗传风险和主观记忆抱怨
要想更准确、更早地发现阿尔茨海默病(AD),对临床前的阿尔茨海默病进行分期,并衡量治疗效果,就需要可靠而灵敏的临床测量方法。外显记忆测试中的轻度损伤被认为预示着罹患阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的认知风险,而轻度认知障碍被认为是正常衰老和阿尔茨海默病之间的过渡阶段。新颖的语义记忆测试,如对新闻事件的记忆,在早期也会受到损害,但却很少受到临床关注,尽管它们可能为评估老年痴呆症的认知风险提供了一种新方法。我们使用新闻事件逆向记忆测试(RM-NET)对认知正常(NC,34 人)、失忆性 MCI(aMCI,27 人)或非 MCI(10 人)老年人的新闻事件记忆进行了研究。我们询问新闻事件记忆是否对以下因素敏感:1)aMCI 和非 aMCI(这一点很少被研究过);2)痴呆遗传风险(任何类型痴呆的阳性家族史、APOE-4 等位基因的存在或 AD 的多基因风险);3)对过去记忆功能的主观判断。我们发现,两个 MCI 亚组都表现出 RM-NET 生命期准确性评分受损,并伴有时间限制性逆行性遗忘。aMCI 组的遗忘症可追溯到测试前 45 年,但不会超过这一时限。在非 MCI 小组中,逆行性遗忘的程度无法得到可靠的估计。患有 MCI 对 RM-NET 的影响大小在非 MCI 组为中等,在 aMCI 组为大,而参与者特征对 RM-NET 准确性评分的影响大小较小。在合并 MCI 组(N = 37)中,新闻事件记忆与痴呆症阳性家族史显著相关,但与更特殊的注意力缺失症风险遗传标记无关。对于 NC 组,新闻事件记忆与任何遗传风险指标都无关。RM-NET对过去记忆的客观测量与两组人对现在或近期记忆的主观判断均无关。相反,当个体主观比较其现在和过去的记忆能力时,这种判断与 RM-NET 对过去记忆的客观测量结果之间存在显著关联(NC 组为直接关联,MCI 组为反向关联)。RM-NET在早期识别具有认知和遗传风险因素的注意力缺失症和非注意力缺失症痴呆症患者方面大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1