Gavin Touponse , Karen Malacon , Guan Li , Ezra Yoseph , Summer Han , Corinna Zygourakis
{"title":"Provider's exposure to diversity contributes to socioeconomic disparities in lumbar and cervical fusion outcomes","authors":"Gavin Touponse , Karen Malacon , Guan Li , Ezra Yoseph , Summer Han , Corinna Zygourakis","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine how providers’ experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003–2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)—a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients—to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54–0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200–44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14–0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1–1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001133/pdfft?md5=6355aca110735b46bba9179b3ebd02c9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590139724001133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139724001133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.
Objective
To examine how providers’ experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.
Methods
Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003–2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)—a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients—to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.
Results
Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54–0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200–44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14–0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1–1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.
Conclusion
While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.
背景有研究报告称,患者的种族、收入和教育程度会影响脊柱融合术的治疗效果;但很少有研究探讨医疗服务提供者的因素(如接触多样性或文化敏感性)对脊柱融合术治疗效果的影响。我们使用医疗机构患者种族多样性指数 (pRDI)--一种已公布的医生接触多样化患者的指标--根据医疗机构的类别(I、II、III)将患者分为不同的组别,其中由 III 类医疗机构治疗的患者的外科医生拥有最多样化的患者群体。倾向得分匹配队列的多变量回归模型检验了患者社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类别对术后结果的影响。与接受第一类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者相比,接受第三类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者的住院时间(Coeff.0.62;95% CI 0.43-0.81)、费用(Coeff.36800;95% CI 29200-44400)和出院回家时间(OR 0.90;95% CI 0.83-0.97)均有所增加。与接受一类医疗机构治疗的患者相比,接受二类医疗机构治疗的亚裔患者再入院率降低(OR 0.38;95% CI 0.14-0.96),接受三类医疗机构治疗的黑人患者出院回家率提高(OR 1.41;95% CI 1.1-1.9)。本研究为今后的研究奠定了基础,以便更好地了解医疗服务提供者的PRDI如何影响腰椎和颈椎手术患者的治疗效果。