The place of content ranking algorithms on the AI risk spectrum

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Telecommunications Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102741
Judit Bayer
{"title":"The place of content ranking algorithms on the AI risk spectrum","authors":"Judit Bayer","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article discusses how content ranking algorithms are positioned within the AI Act. It seeks an answer the quesetion whether content ranking algorithms could count as high-risk systems under the Act? It examines the possibility of later inclusion into the list of high-risk systems by Commission action. Then, it compares the envisioned obligations of high-risk systems with those provided by the Digital Services Act. The article puts forward arguments that content ranking algorithms should be subjected to strict ethical requirements due to their impact on the democratic public discourse, and therefore indirectly, democracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"48 5","pages":"Article 102741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596124000387/pdfft?md5=a3978e73d96f7b51dddee0479bcadcb4&pid=1-s2.0-S0308596124000387-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telecommunications Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596124000387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses how content ranking algorithms are positioned within the AI Act. It seeks an answer the quesetion whether content ranking algorithms could count as high-risk systems under the Act? It examines the possibility of later inclusion into the list of high-risk systems by Commission action. Then, it compares the envisioned obligations of high-risk systems with those provided by the Digital Services Act. The article puts forward arguments that content ranking algorithms should be subjected to strict ethical requirements due to their impact on the democratic public discourse, and therefore indirectly, democracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内容排名算法在人工智能风险中的地位
本文讨论了内容排名算法在《人工智能法》中的定位。它试图回答这样一个问题:内容排名算法是否可以算作该法案下的高风险系统?它探讨了日后通过委员会行动纳入高风险系统名单的可能性。然后,文章将高风险系统的预期义务与《数字服务法》规定的义务进行了比较。文章提出的论点是,由于内容排名算法对民主公共讨论的影响,因此间接影响到民主,因此应该对其进行严格的道德要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telecommunications Policy
Telecommunications Policy 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Telecommunications Policy is concerned with the impact of digitalization in the economy and society. The journal is multidisciplinary, encompassing conceptual, theoretical and empirical studies, quantitative as well as qualitative. The scope includes policy, regulation, and governance; big data, artificial intelligence and data science; new and traditional sectors encompassing new media and the platform economy; management, entrepreneurship, innovation and use. Contributions may explore these topics at national, regional and international levels, including issues confronting both developed and developing countries. The papers accepted by the journal meet high standards of analytical rigor and policy relevance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Does affordable Internet promote maternal and child healthcare access? Evidence from a post-telecommunication market disruption period in India Digital discrimination under disparate impact: A legal and economic analysis Willingness to pay for broadband: A case study of Wisconsin Why do users perceive digital platforms as indispensable to their lives?: A study on KakaoTalk in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1