Assimilation of Geophysics-Derived Spatial Data for Model Calibration in Geologic CO2 Sequestration

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM SPE Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.2118/212975-pa
Bailian Chen, Misael Morales, Zhiwei Ma, Qinjun Kang, Rajesh Pawar
{"title":"Assimilation of Geophysics-Derived Spatial Data for Model Calibration in Geologic CO2 Sequestration","authors":"Bailian Chen, Misael Morales, Zhiwei Ma, Qinjun Kang, Rajesh Pawar","doi":"10.2118/212975-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Uncertainty in geological models usually leads to large uncertainty in the predictions of risk-related system properties and/or risk metrics (e.g., CO2 plumes and CO2/brine leakage rates) at a geologic CO2 storage site. Different types of data (e.g., point measurements from monitoring wells and spatial data from 4D seismic surveys) can be leveraged or assimilated to reduce the risk predictions. In this work, we develop a novel framework for spatial data assimilation and risk forecasting. Under the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP), we have developed a framework using an ensemble-based data assimilation approach for spatial data assimilation and forecasting. In particular, we took CO2 saturation maps interpreted from 4D seismic surveys as inputs for spatial data assimilation. Three seismic surveys at Years 1, 3, and 5 were considered in this study. Accordingly, three saturation maps were generated for data assimilation. The impact from the level of data noise was also investigated in this work. Our results show increased similarity between the updated reservoir models and the “ground-truth” model with the increased number of seismic surveys. Predictive accuracy in CO2 saturation plume increases with the increased number of seismic surveys as well. We also observed that with the increase in the level of data noise from 1% to 10%, the difference between the updated models and the ground truth does not increase significantly. Similar observations were made for the prediction of CO2 plume distribution at the end of the CO2 injection period by increasing the data noise.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212975-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty in geological models usually leads to large uncertainty in the predictions of risk-related system properties and/or risk metrics (e.g., CO2 plumes and CO2/brine leakage rates) at a geologic CO2 storage site. Different types of data (e.g., point measurements from monitoring wells and spatial data from 4D seismic surveys) can be leveraged or assimilated to reduce the risk predictions. In this work, we develop a novel framework for spatial data assimilation and risk forecasting. Under the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP), we have developed a framework using an ensemble-based data assimilation approach for spatial data assimilation and forecasting. In particular, we took CO2 saturation maps interpreted from 4D seismic surveys as inputs for spatial data assimilation. Three seismic surveys at Years 1, 3, and 5 were considered in this study. Accordingly, three saturation maps were generated for data assimilation. The impact from the level of data noise was also investigated in this work. Our results show increased similarity between the updated reservoir models and the “ground-truth” model with the increased number of seismic surveys. Predictive accuracy in CO2 saturation plume increases with the increased number of seismic surveys as well. We also observed that with the increase in the level of data noise from 1% to 10%, the difference between the updated models and the ground truth does not increase significantly. Similar observations were made for the prediction of CO2 plume distribution at the end of the CO2 injection period by increasing the data noise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球物理学衍生空间数据同化用于二氧化碳地质封存模型校准
地质模型的不确定性通常会导致对二氧化碳地质封存场址与风险相关的系统属性和/或风险指标(如二氧化碳羽流和二氧化碳/卤水泄漏率)的预测存在很大的不确定性。可以利用或同化不同类型的数据(如监测井的点测量数据和四维地震勘探的空间数据)来降低风险预测。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个新颖的空间数据同化和风险预测框架。在美国能源部的国家风险评估合作项目(NRAP)下,我们利用基于集合的数据同化方法开发了一个用于空间数据同化和预测的框架。特别是,我们将四维地震勘测解释的二氧化碳饱和度图作为空间数据同化的输入。本研究考虑了第 1 年、第 3 年和第 5 年的三次地震勘探。因此,生成了三张饱和度图用于数据同化。这项工作还研究了数据噪声水平的影响。研究结果表明,随着地震勘探次数的增加,更新的储层模型与 "地面实况 "模型之间的相似性也在增加。二氧化碳饱和羽流的预测精度也随着地震勘探次数的增加而提高。我们还观察到,随着数据噪声水平从 1%增加到 10%,更新模型与 "地面实况 "模型之间的差异并没有显著增加。通过增加数据噪声,在预测二氧化碳注入期结束时的二氧化碳羽流分布时也观察到了类似的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on the Effect of Rock Mechanical Properties and Fracture Morphology Features on Lost Circulation Spatiotemporal X-Ray Imaging of Neat and Viscosified CO2 in Displacement of Brine-Saturated Porous Media Novel Resin-Coated Sand Placement Design Guidelines for Controlling Proppant Flowback Post-Slickwater Hydraulic Fracturing Treatments Study on Plugging the Multiscale Water Channeling in Low-Permeability Heterogeneous Porous Media Based on the Growth of Bacteria Integrated Optimization of Hybrid Steam-Solvent Injection in Post-CHOPS Reservoirs with Consideration of Wormhole Networks and Foamy Oil Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1