A quality improvement intervention on surgical prophylaxis impact in antibiotic consumption and cost in selected surgical procedures

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.03.003
H. Guanche Garcell , F.J. Aragón Palmero , D.A. Marquez Reyna , N. Seoane Perez , R.M. Desdin Rodriguez , O.R. Exposito Reyes , W. Martinez Martinez , A. Villanueva Arias , S.I. Gonzalez Perez , T.M. Fernandez Hernandez , A.M. Felipe Garmendia
{"title":"A quality improvement intervention on surgical prophylaxis impact in antibiotic consumption and cost in selected surgical procedures","authors":"H. Guanche Garcell ,&nbsp;F.J. Aragón Palmero ,&nbsp;D.A. Marquez Reyna ,&nbsp;N. Seoane Perez ,&nbsp;R.M. Desdin Rodriguez ,&nbsp;O.R. Exposito Reyes ,&nbsp;W. Martinez Martinez ,&nbsp;A. Villanueva Arias ,&nbsp;S.I. Gonzalez Perez ,&nbsp;T.M. Fernandez Hernandez ,&nbsp;A.M. Felipe Garmendia","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Improper compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in surgery is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI), and impacts the efficiency of healthcare.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Evaluate the impact of an intervention in compliance with AP in selected surgical procedures and its effect on antibiotic consumption and cost.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective interventional study was performed in a community hospital from January to December 2022. The baseline period was considered January–April 2022 and the intervention period May–December 2022. All patients who underwent cesarean section, appendectomies, hernia surgery, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), abdominoplasty, and cholecystectomy during the study period were selected. The intervention includes staff education, pharmacy interventions, monitoring the quality of prescriptions and feedback, and improved role of anesthesia staff, and department champions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study involved 192 and 617 surgical procedures in the baseline and intervention periods respectively. The compliance with timing, selection, dose, and discontinuation achieved 100%, 99.2%, and 97.6% from baseline figures of 92.7%, 95.8%, and 81.3%, respectively. The antibiotic consumption was reduced by 55.1% during the intervention with a higher contribution of other antibiotics (94.1% reduction) in comparison with antibiotics as per policy (31.2% reduction). The cost was reduced by 47.2% (antibiotic as per policy 31.9%, other antibiotics 94.2%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The implemented strategy was effective in improving the quality of antibiotic prophylaxis with a significant impact in reducing antibiotic consumption and cost.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Improper compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in surgery is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI), and impacts the efficiency of healthcare.

Objective

Evaluate the impact of an intervention in compliance with AP in selected surgical procedures and its effect on antibiotic consumption and cost.

Methods

A prospective interventional study was performed in a community hospital from January to December 2022. The baseline period was considered January–April 2022 and the intervention period May–December 2022. All patients who underwent cesarean section, appendectomies, hernia surgery, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), abdominoplasty, and cholecystectomy during the study period were selected. The intervention includes staff education, pharmacy interventions, monitoring the quality of prescriptions and feedback, and improved role of anesthesia staff, and department champions.

Results

The study involved 192 and 617 surgical procedures in the baseline and intervention periods respectively. The compliance with timing, selection, dose, and discontinuation achieved 100%, 99.2%, and 97.6% from baseline figures of 92.7%, 95.8%, and 81.3%, respectively. The antibiotic consumption was reduced by 55.1% during the intervention with a higher contribution of other antibiotics (94.1% reduction) in comparison with antibiotics as per policy (31.2% reduction). The cost was reduced by 47.2% (antibiotic as per policy 31.9%, other antibiotics 94.2%).

Conclusion

The implemented strategy was effective in improving the quality of antibiotic prophylaxis with a significant impact in reducing antibiotic consumption and cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术预防质量改进干预措施对特定外科手术中抗生素消耗量和成本的影响。
背景外科手术中抗生素预防(AP)依从性不佳与手术部位感染(SSI)风险增加有关,并影响医疗效率。方法2022 年 1 月至 12 月在一家社区医院开展了一项前瞻性干预研究。基线期为 2022 年 1 月至 4 月,干预期为 2022 年 5 月至 12 月。所有在研究期间接受剖宫产术、阑尾切除术、疝气手术、开放复位内固定术(ORIF)、腹壁整形术和胆囊切除术的患者均被选中。干预措施包括员工教育、药房干预、处方质量监测和反馈,以及提高麻醉人员和科室标兵的作用。与基线数字 92.7%、95.8% 和 81.3%相比,抗生素使用时间、选择、剂量和停用的依从性分别达到了 100%、99.2% 和 97.6%。在干预期间,抗生素用量减少了 55.1%,与政策规定的抗生素用量(减少 31.2%)相比,其他抗生素的用量减少了 94.1%。结论:所实施的策略有效提高了抗生素预防治疗的质量,对减少抗生素用量和成本产生了显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients]. Determinants of citizens' choice between public and private hospitals. Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1