Patient Interest in Quadriceps Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Increasing Over Other Autograft Options: A 12-Year Google Trends Analysis

Joseph C. Brinkman M.D. , M. Lane Moore B.S. , Cara Lai M.D. , Sailesh V. Tummala M.D. , Jordan R. Pollock B.S. , Kade S. McQuivey M.D. , Jeffrey D. Hassebrock M.D. , Adam B. Thompson B.S. , Anikar Chhabra M.D.
{"title":"Patient Interest in Quadriceps Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Increasing Over Other Autograft Options: A 12-Year Google Trends Analysis","authors":"Joseph C. Brinkman M.D. ,&nbsp;M. Lane Moore B.S. ,&nbsp;Cara Lai M.D. ,&nbsp;Sailesh V. Tummala M.D. ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Pollock B.S. ,&nbsp;Kade S. McQuivey M.D. ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Hassebrock M.D. ,&nbsp;Adam B. Thompson B.S. ,&nbsp;Anikar Chhabra M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To use Google trends to explore differences in public interest among types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autografts, specifically quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon, and hamstring tendon autografts, between 2008 and 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained by querying Google Trends for key terms and phrases for online search data ranging from January 2008 to December 2019. Relative search volumes were created based on searches related to ACL reconstruction with comparative analysis generated for search terms related to quadriceps ACL, patellar tendon ACL, and hamstring ACL autografts. Statistical analysis included linear regression analysis, comparison of quarterly search volume trends over time, and comparison of cumulative annual search volumes for 2008 versus 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Linear models for respective search terms were statistically significant for the quadriceps (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and patellar (<em>P</em> = .007) tendon autograft groups but not the hamstring group (<em>P</em> = .129). The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a 12-year search volume trend change of 0.56, which was significantly greater than the hamstring (0.07; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and patellar tendon (0.168; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) groups. There was no significant difference in the trend change between hamstring and patellar tendon groups (<em>P</em> = .20). Percent change in cumulative relative annual search volumes between 2008 and 2019 was 112% for the quadriceps tendon group, 12.9% for the hamstring group, and 18.6% for the patellar tendon group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study indicates a consistently increasing public interest in quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction. The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a significantly greater 12-year online search volume, greater linear correlation, and larger percent change between 2008 and 2019 compared with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft groups.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Awareness of patient perceptions has value in informing shared decision-making, aligning patient expectations, and guiding areas of future research. Each of these has an impact on patient care. Being aware of patient interest and expectations is particularly important in areas with controversial or emerging research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000609/pdfft?md5=8243baa053d0d31e71f1e983c11a4385&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000609-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To use Google trends to explore differences in public interest among types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autografts, specifically quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon, and hamstring tendon autografts, between 2008 and 2019.

Methods

Data were obtained by querying Google Trends for key terms and phrases for online search data ranging from January 2008 to December 2019. Relative search volumes were created based on searches related to ACL reconstruction with comparative analysis generated for search terms related to quadriceps ACL, patellar tendon ACL, and hamstring ACL autografts. Statistical analysis included linear regression analysis, comparison of quarterly search volume trends over time, and comparison of cumulative annual search volumes for 2008 versus 2019.

Results

Linear models for respective search terms were statistically significant for the quadriceps (P < .001) and patellar (P = .007) tendon autograft groups but not the hamstring group (P = .129). The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a 12-year search volume trend change of 0.56, which was significantly greater than the hamstring (0.07; P < .001) and patellar tendon (0.168; P < .001) groups. There was no significant difference in the trend change between hamstring and patellar tendon groups (P = .20). Percent change in cumulative relative annual search volumes between 2008 and 2019 was 112% for the quadriceps tendon group, 12.9% for the hamstring group, and 18.6% for the patellar tendon group.

Conclusions

This study indicates a consistently increasing public interest in quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction. The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a significantly greater 12-year online search volume, greater linear correlation, and larger percent change between 2008 and 2019 compared with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft groups.

Clinical Relevance

Awareness of patient perceptions has value in informing shared decision-making, aligning patient expectations, and guiding areas of future research. Each of these has an impact on patient care. Being aware of patient interest and expectations is particularly important in areas with controversial or emerging research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与其他自体移植方案相比,患者对股四头肌自体移植前交叉韧带重建术的兴趣与日俱增:12 年谷歌趋势分析
目的利用谷歌趋势探索 2008 年至 2019 年间公众对前交叉韧带(ACL)自体移植类型(尤其是股四头肌腱、髌腱和腘绳肌腱自体移植)的兴趣差异。方法通过查询谷歌趋势中 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在线搜索数据的关键术语和短语获得数据。根据与前交叉韧带重建相关的搜索创建相对搜索量,并对与股四头肌前交叉韧带、髌腱前交叉韧带和腘绳肌前交叉韧带自体移植相关的搜索词进行比较分析。统计分析包括线性回归分析、季度搜索量随时间变化趋势的比较,以及 2008 年与 2019 年累积年度搜索量的比较。结果对于股四头肌组(P <.001)和髌腱自体移植组(P = .007),各自搜索词的线性模型具有统计学意义,但对于腘绳肌组(P = .129)则无意义。股四头肌自体移植组 12 年搜索量趋势变化为 0.56,明显高于腘绳肌组(0.07;P <;.001)和髌腱组(0.168;P <;.001)。腘绳肌腱组和髌骨肌腱组的趋势变化无明显差异(P = .20)。2008年至2019年期间,股四头肌腱组的累积相对年搜索量变化百分比为112%,腘绳肌腱组为12.9%,髌骨肌腱组为18.6%。结论本研究表明,公众对股四头肌腱自体移植用于前交叉韧带重建的兴趣持续上升。与髌腱组或腘绳肌自体移植组相比,股四头肌自体移植组的 12 年在线搜索量明显更大,线性相关性更高,2008 年至 2019 年间的百分比变化也更大。这些都会对患者护理产生影响。了解患者的兴趣和期望对于有争议或新兴的研究领域尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Continuous Meniscal Repair Technique Allows for Shorter Operative Time and Learning Curve Compared With Traditional Vertical Mattress Technique in Controlled Arthroscopic Training in Porcine Model Concomitant Popliteomeniscal Fascicles Tears Are Found in 21% of Professional Soccer Players With Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Mini-Open Technique for Gluteus Medius Tendon Repairs Is Associated With Low Complication Rates and Sustained Improvement in Patient Reported Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up The Top-20 Studies About Anterior Shoulder Instability From an Altmetric Analysis Had Higher Levels of Evidence Than Those From a Traditional Bibliometric Analysis Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Augmented With a Reinforced Bioinductive Implant Is Biomechanically Similar to the Native Medial Patellofemoral Ligament at Time Zero in a Cadaveric Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1