Male-to-female transgenders demonstrated unique perspectives on perceived facial attractiveness and orthognathic surgery need

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.03.001
{"title":"Male-to-female transgenders demonstrated unique perspectives on perceived facial attractiveness and orthognathic surgery need","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The esthetic preference and decision concerning undergoing orthognathic surgery in the transgender population have not been reported. The aims of this study were to examine the influence of the sagittal mandibular position on the esthetic perception and perceived surgery need in male-to-female transgenders (MTFTs) compared with male and female laypeople.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire study was performed by male-to-female transgender, male and female laypeople. Three-dimensional black &amp; white male and female facial images with facial contour angle (FCA) of 3°, 1°, 5°, 9°,13°, 17°, and 21° were shown to the participants. The participants scored the images’ perceived facial attractiveness using visual analog scales (VAS) and indicated whether orthognathic surgery was needed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participants included 85 MTFTs, 85 males, and 85 females. The results revealed that there were significant differences in the VAS scores between the MTFT and male participants. The MTFTs rated the male images with prognathism of 1° and -3°FCA in significantly lower scores compared with the males (<em>P</em> = 0.033, <em>P</em> = 0.010). Female images with prognathism 1°FCA was rated by the MTFTs in significantly lower scores compared with the males (<em>P</em> = 0.041). A significantly higher number of surgery needs was found in the MTFTs compared with the other groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Gender influences esthetic perception and the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. MTFTs have a unique perspective on facial esthetics, being more desirous of surgery than males and females. Clinicians should be aware of the ideal expectation in facial esthetics in MTFTs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443824000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The esthetic preference and decision concerning undergoing orthognathic surgery in the transgender population have not been reported. The aims of this study were to examine the influence of the sagittal mandibular position on the esthetic perception and perceived surgery need in male-to-female transgenders (MTFTs) compared with male and female laypeople.

Materials and Methods

A questionnaire study was performed by male-to-female transgender, male and female laypeople. Three-dimensional black & white male and female facial images with facial contour angle (FCA) of 3°, 1°, 5°, 9°,13°, 17°, and 21° were shown to the participants. The participants scored the images’ perceived facial attractiveness using visual analog scales (VAS) and indicated whether orthognathic surgery was needed.

Results

The participants included 85 MTFTs, 85 males, and 85 females. The results revealed that there were significant differences in the VAS scores between the MTFT and male participants. The MTFTs rated the male images with prognathism of 1° and -3°FCA in significantly lower scores compared with the males (P = 0.033, P = 0.010). Female images with prognathism 1°FCA was rated by the MTFTs in significantly lower scores compared with the males (P = 0.041). A significantly higher number of surgery needs was found in the MTFTs compared with the other groups.

Conclusions

Gender influences esthetic perception and the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. MTFTs have a unique perspective on facial esthetics, being more desirous of surgery than males and females. Clinicians should be aware of the ideal expectation in facial esthetics in MTFTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男变女的变性人在感知面部吸引力和正颌手术需求方面表现出独特的视角。
目的 关于变性人的审美偏好和接受正颌外科手术的决定尚未见报道。本研究旨在探讨与男性和女性普通人相比,下颌矢状位对男变女变性者(MTFTs)的审美感知和手术需求感知的影响。向参与者展示了面部轮廓角(FCA)为 3°、1°、5°、9°、13°、17° 和 21°的黑色和白色男性和女性三维面部图像。参与者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对图片的面部吸引力进行评分,并指出是否需要进行正颌外科手术。结果显示,MTFT 和男性参与者的 VAS 分数存在显著差异。与男性相比,MTFT 对前突 1° 和 -3°FCA 的男性图像的评分明显较低(P = 0.033,P = 0.010)。与男性相比(P = 0.041),MTFTs 对前突 1°FCA 的女性图像评分明显较低。与其他组别相比,MTFTs 的手术需求数量明显更高。MTFTs 对面部美学有独特的见解,他们比男性和女性更渴望手术。临床医生应了解 MTFTs 对面部美学的理想期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Nonsurgical treatment of an adult patient with severe transversal skeletal discrepancy: Tooth bone-borne tandem expander and hybrid aligner approach Comparison of the accuracy of bracket axial positioning with and without radiographic support and according to practitioner experience: A three-dimensional study Evaluation of incipient enamel-carious-like lesion treated with hydroxyapatite-chitosan nanocomposite hydrogel. Evaluation of incipient enamel-carious–like lesion treated with hydroxyapatite-chitosan nanocomposite hydrogel Validity of digital analysis versus manual analysis on orthodontic casts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1