A STUDY ON COMPARISON OF ACCEPTANCE AND CONTINUATION OF PPIUCD VERSUS CENTCHROMAN IN POSTNATAL WOMEN

Yashashwini Mishra, Deepak Anand
{"title":"A STUDY ON COMPARISON OF ACCEPTANCE AND CONTINUATION OF PPIUCD VERSUS CENTCHROMAN IN POSTNATAL WOMEN","authors":"Yashashwini Mishra, Deepak Anand","doi":"10.36106/ijar/5600633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background- Assisting women in maintaining recommended inter-pregnancy intervals is a critical concern for\nmaternal-child health. Centchroman, a non-steroidal selective oestrogen receptor modulator, and postpartum intrauterine\ncontraceptive device (PPIUCD) is commonly used to provide long-term reversible contraception. To have knowledge regarding acceptance and\ncontinuation of Centchroman versus PPIUCD among women's of Uttar Pradesh, India this study was carried out. To nd out Objective-1-\nsociodemographic factors affecting selection for centchroman and PPIUCD among postnatal women's. 2-Compare the side effects and\ncompliance of PPIUCD versus centchroman pills in postnatal women.3- Compare the satisfaction of PPIUCD versus centchroman pills in\npostnatal women. A Prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Material and Methods: KGMU,\nLucknow. Total of 200 womens were enrolled in the study. They were further divided into two groups, i.e., Group-A consenting for PPIUCD use\nand Group-B consenting for using Centchroman. These women were followed at intervals of 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and one year after\ndelivery and were investigated for their socio demographic variables, side effects, continuation rate and satisfaction from contraceptive used.\nConclusion: Acceptance for PPIUCD was found more in less educated , lower socioeconomic class, unemployed, after caeserian section, and\nresiding in rural areas women's. Acceptance for centrchroman was more in educated , middle socioeconomic class, employed, after normal\ndelivery and women's residing in urban area. Continuation rate for centchroman was higher. There was no statistical signicant difference\nregarding menstrual abnormalities in both groups, menorrhagia was found statistically signicantly higher in centchroman using group,\nsatisfaction and continuation was found higher in PPIUCD using women's .","PeriodicalId":13502,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of applied research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of applied research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/5600633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background- Assisting women in maintaining recommended inter-pregnancy intervals is a critical concern for maternal-child health. Centchroman, a non-steroidal selective oestrogen receptor modulator, and postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is commonly used to provide long-term reversible contraception. To have knowledge regarding acceptance and continuation of Centchroman versus PPIUCD among women's of Uttar Pradesh, India this study was carried out. To nd out Objective-1- sociodemographic factors affecting selection for centchroman and PPIUCD among postnatal women's. 2-Compare the side effects and compliance of PPIUCD versus centchroman pills in postnatal women.3- Compare the satisfaction of PPIUCD versus centchroman pills in postnatal women. A Prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Material and Methods: KGMU, Lucknow. Total of 200 womens were enrolled in the study. They were further divided into two groups, i.e., Group-A consenting for PPIUCD use and Group-B consenting for using Centchroman. These women were followed at intervals of 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and one year after delivery and were investigated for their socio demographic variables, side effects, continuation rate and satisfaction from contraceptive used. Conclusion: Acceptance for PPIUCD was found more in less educated , lower socioeconomic class, unemployed, after caeserian section, and residing in rural areas women's. Acceptance for centrchroman was more in educated , middle socioeconomic class, employed, after normal delivery and women's residing in urban area. Continuation rate for centchroman was higher. There was no statistical signicant difference regarding menstrual abnormalities in both groups, menorrhagia was found statistically signicantly higher in centchroman using group, satisfaction and continuation was found higher in PPIUCD using women's .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于产后妇女接受和继续使用 ppiucd 与 centchroman 的比较研究
背景--帮助妇女维持推荐的孕间隔期是母婴健康的关键问题。非甾体选择性雌激素受体调节剂 Centchroman 和产后宫内避孕器(PPIUCD)通常用于提供长期可逆避孕。为了了解印度北方邦妇女对 Centchroman 和 PPIUCD 的接受程度和停用情况,我们开展了这项研究。 了解目标 1-影响产后妇女选择 Centchroman 和 PPIUCD 的社会人口因素。2-比较 PPIUCD 与 centchroman 避孕药对产后妇女的副作用和依从性。3-比较 PPIUCD 与 centchroman 避孕药对产后妇女的满意度。一项前瞻性研究在勒克瑙 KGMU 妇产科进行:材料和方法:勒克瑙 KGMU。共有 200 名妇女参加了这项研究。她们被分为两组,即同意使用 PPIUCD 的 A 组和同意使用 Centchroman 的 B 组。分别在产后 6 周、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年对这些妇女进行随访,调查她们的社会人口变量、副作用、持续率和对所使用避孕药具的满意度:教育程度较低、社会经济地位较低、失业、剖腹产后和居住在农村地区的妇女对 PPIUCD 的接受度较高。受过教育、属于中等社会经济阶层、有工作、正常分娩后和居住在城市地区的妇女更容易接受 centrchroman。继续使用 centchroman 的比例更高。两组妇女在月经异常方面没有显著的统计学差异,使用 centchroman 组的月经过多率显著高于使用 PPIUCD 组,满意度和持续率也高于使用 PPIUCD 组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BARRON'S BANDING VERSUS SCLEROTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS SLEEP QUALITY, QUALITY OF LIFE AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL: COMPARISON BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS BODY COMPOSITION DISTRIBUTION IN MIDDLE-AGED WORKING WOMEN AND HOMEMAKERS- A COMPARISON PIGMENTATION IN ANIMALS: A STRATEGY TO LIFE TURRITOXIN PAIAA SOURCE OF NOVEL ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES AGAINST A. BAUMANNII
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1